The use of excel spread sheet and printer in marking medical science objective questions: An alternative to manual marking method

Q4 Medicine
Raymond Okolo, O. Kolawole
{"title":"The use of excel spread sheet and printer in marking medical science objective questions: An alternative to manual marking method","authors":"Raymond Okolo, O. Kolawole","doi":"10.4103/smj.smj_61_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Multiple-choice question (MCQ) is an effective form of written assessments for knowledge acquisition. Optical mark reading scanner is used for grading MCQs. Major setback in the use of scanner is the cost of acquiring it. Consequently, several manual methods such as conference making and stencil overlay are used to mark MCQ. This paper highlights the use of Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet and printer to mark MCQ and compares the method with other manual methods of marking. Materials and Methods: Five sets of 100 stems of objective questions (true or false, one in five, and matching types) were administered to students. Answer script was designed using Excel Spreadsheet. Three groups of marking were done: directly on the question paper, use of stencil for marking on the answer script, use of Microsoft Excel soft copy. At the end of the marking process, mean marking time, mean collation time, mean counting time, and mean marking error were collated and compared. The instant computer statistical software was used to calculate means, standard deviations, and ANOVA.A P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. Results: Results showed a statistically significant low mean marking time of 0.68 h (P < 0.0001) for the spreadsheet/printer marking method. Marking error was significantly low with this method (P < 0.001) as compared with other manual marking methods. The collation time and counting time were not significantly different across the groups. Conclusion: It is concluded that Excel Spreadsheet and printer marking method significantly reduced marking time and marking errors in marking MCQs.","PeriodicalId":52324,"journal":{"name":"Sahel Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sahel Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/smj.smj_61_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple-choice question (MCQ) is an effective form of written assessments for knowledge acquisition. Optical mark reading scanner is used for grading MCQs. Major setback in the use of scanner is the cost of acquiring it. Consequently, several manual methods such as conference making and stencil overlay are used to mark MCQ. This paper highlights the use of Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet and printer to mark MCQ and compares the method with other manual methods of marking. Materials and Methods: Five sets of 100 stems of objective questions (true or false, one in five, and matching types) were administered to students. Answer script was designed using Excel Spreadsheet. Three groups of marking were done: directly on the question paper, use of stencil for marking on the answer script, use of Microsoft Excel soft copy. At the end of the marking process, mean marking time, mean collation time, mean counting time, and mean marking error were collated and compared. The instant computer statistical software was used to calculate means, standard deviations, and ANOVA.A P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. Results: Results showed a statistically significant low mean marking time of 0.68 h (P < 0.0001) for the spreadsheet/printer marking method. Marking error was significantly low with this method (P < 0.001) as compared with other manual marking methods. The collation time and counting time were not significantly different across the groups. Conclusion: It is concluded that Excel Spreadsheet and printer marking method significantly reduced marking time and marking errors in marking MCQs.
使用excel电子表格和打印机标记医学客观问题:人工标记方法的替代方法
背景:选择题(MCQ)是知识获取的一种有效的书面评估形式。光学标记读取扫描仪用于mcq分级。使用扫描仪的主要障碍是获取扫描仪的成本。因此,采用会议制作和模板覆盖等几种手工方法来标记MCQ。本文重点介绍了使用Microsoft Excel电子表格和打印机对MCQ进行标记,并与其他手工标记方法进行了比较。材料与方法:对学生进行五组100题的客观问题(真假、五分之一和匹配类型)。使用Excel电子表格设计答题脚本。分三组批改:直接在试卷上批改,使用模板在答题卡上批改,使用Microsoft Excel软拷贝。在标记过程结束时,对平均标记时间、平均整理时间、平均计数时间和平均标记误差进行整理和比较。使用即时计算机统计软件计算平均值、标准差和方差分析。P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:结果显示,电子表格/打印机打标方法的平均打标时间较低,为0.68 h (P < 0.0001),具有统计学意义。与其他手工标记方法相比,该方法标记误差显著降低(P < 0.001)。各组的整理时间和计数时间差异无统计学意义。结论:Excel电子表格和打印机标记方法在标记mcq时显著减少了标记时间和标记错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sahel Medical Journal
Sahel Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
47 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信