Influence of calculation criteria on the values of low-flow recession constants in a non-homogenous catchment in Slovenia

Q3 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Klaudija Sapač, S. Rusjan, M. Šraj
{"title":"Influence of calculation criteria on the values of low-flow recession constants in a non-homogenous catchment in Slovenia","authors":"Klaudija Sapač, S. Rusjan, M. Šraj","doi":"10.15292/ACTA.HYDRO.2019.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we analyse the influence of three different calculation criteria on the values of low-flow recession constants, namely the influence of the calculation method, recession curve segment length (4, 5, 6, or 7 days) and of the selected period (whole period, monthly, seasonally) for the calculation of the initial discharge, which determines the threshold on the falling limb of the hydrograph for the recession analysis. The analysis is based on daily discharge data of 11 gauging stations in the hydrogeologically non-homogenous Ljubljanica River catchment. For each of the stations, we calculated 24 values of recession constants using a different combination of criteria. Based on these values we determined the influence of each criterion on the final result using statistical tests and graphical approaches. Analysis showed that the recession constants calculated using various methods are statistically significantly different for all gauging stations. The recession constants obtained using the individual recession segment method (IRS) are on average 3.1 days higher than those calculated using the master recession curve method (MRC). The influence of the other two criteria, namely the length of the segment and the period for calculating the initial discharge, is not so obvious, since it is most likely conditioned by catchments’ characteristics influencing the time dynamics of the runoff.","PeriodicalId":36671,"journal":{"name":"Acta Hydrotechnica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Hydrotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15292/ACTA.HYDRO.2019.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In this paper we analyse the influence of three different calculation criteria on the values of low-flow recession constants, namely the influence of the calculation method, recession curve segment length (4, 5, 6, or 7 days) and of the selected period (whole period, monthly, seasonally) for the calculation of the initial discharge, which determines the threshold on the falling limb of the hydrograph for the recession analysis. The analysis is based on daily discharge data of 11 gauging stations in the hydrogeologically non-homogenous Ljubljanica River catchment. For each of the stations, we calculated 24 values of recession constants using a different combination of criteria. Based on these values we determined the influence of each criterion on the final result using statistical tests and graphical approaches. Analysis showed that the recession constants calculated using various methods are statistically significantly different for all gauging stations. The recession constants obtained using the individual recession segment method (IRS) are on average 3.1 days higher than those calculated using the master recession curve method (MRC). The influence of the other two criteria, namely the length of the segment and the period for calculating the initial discharge, is not so obvious, since it is most likely conditioned by catchments’ characteristics influencing the time dynamics of the runoff.
计算标准对斯洛文尼亚非均匀集水区低流量衰退常数值的影响
本文分析了三种不同的计算准则对低流量衰退常数值的影响,即计算方法、衰退曲线段长度(4、5、6、7天)和计算初始流量所选择的周期(全周期、月度、季节性)的影响,而初始流量的计算决定了衰退分析的水线下降边缘的阈值。该分析基于水文地质不均匀的卢布尔雅尼察河流域11个测量站的日流量数据。对于每个站点,我们使用不同的标准组合计算了24个衰退常数值。基于这些值,我们使用统计检验和图形方法确定了每个标准对最终结果的影响。分析表明,各测量站用不同方法计算的退行常数有显著的统计学差异。用个别衰退段法(IRS)计算的衰退常数比用主衰退曲线法(MRC)计算的衰退常数平均高3.1天。另外两个标准的影响,即河段长度和计算初始流量的周期,并不那么明显,因为它很可能是由影响径流时间动态的集水区特征决定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Hydrotechnica
Acta Hydrotechnica Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信