The international dynamics of counter-peace

IF 2.7 1区社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

European Journal of International Relations Pub Date : 2023-04-29 DOI:10.1177/13540661231168772

Oliver P. Richmond, Sandra Pogodda, Gëzim Visoka

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peace processes and international order are interdependent: while the latter provides the normative framework for the former, peacemaking tools and their underlying ideology also maintain international order. They indicate its viability and legitimacy partly by meeting local claims as well as though the maintenance of geopolitical balances. In the emerging multipolar order, the international peace architecture (IPA), dominated by the liberal international order (LIO), is contested through counter-peace processes. These processes contest the nature of the state, state-society relations and increasingly international order itself. This paper investigates the tactics and strategies of regional actors and great powers, where they engage in peace and order related activities or interventions. Given the weakness and inconsistency of the IPA and the LIO, such contestation leads to challenges to international order itself, often at the expense of the claims of social movements and civil society networks.

查看原文本刊更多论文

反和平的国际动态

和平进程和国际秩序是相互依存的：虽然后者为前者提供了规范性框架，但建立和平的工具及其基本意识形态也维护着国际秩序。它们部分通过满足当地要求以及维持地缘政治平衡来表明其可行性和合法性。在新兴的多极秩序中，由自由国际秩序主导的国际和平架构（IPA）通过反和平进程受到质疑。这些过程与国家的性质、国家与社会的关系以及日益增多的国际秩序本身相竞争。本文调查了区域行为者和大国参与和平与秩序相关活动或干预的策略和战略。鉴于IPA和LIO的弱点和不一致性，这种争论往往以牺牲社会运动和民间社会网络的主张为代价，导致对国际秩序本身的挑战。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Journal of International Relations INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-

CiteScore

6.60

自引率

8.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of International Relations publishes peer-reviewed scholarly contributions across the full breadth of the field of International Relations, from cutting edge theoretical debates to topics of contemporary and historical interest to scholars and practitioners in the IR community. The journal eschews adherence to any particular school or approach, nor is it either predisposed or restricted to any particular methodology. Theoretically aware empirical analysis and conceptual innovation forms the core of the journal’s dissemination of International Relations scholarship throughout the global academic community. In keeping with its European roots, this includes a commitment to underlying philosophical and normative issues relevant to the field, as well as interaction with related disciplines in the social sciences and humanities. This theoretical and methodological openness aims to produce a European journal with global impact, fostering broad awareness and innovation in a dynamic discipline. Adherence to this broad mandate has underpinned the journal’s emergence as a major and independent worldwide voice across the sub-fields of International Relations scholarship. The Editors embrace and are committed to further developing this inheritance. Above all the journal aims to achieve a representative balance across the diversity of the field and to promote deeper understanding of the rapidly-changing world around us. This includes an active and on-going commitment to facilitating dialogue with the study of global politics in the social sciences and beyond, among others international history, international law, international and development economics, and political/economic geography. The EJIR warmly embraces genuinely interdisciplinary scholarship that actively engages with the broad debates taking place across the contemporary field of international relations.