Positional factors affecting the bond failure rates in orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Orthodontic Waves Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.odw.2019.06.001

Ömer Hatipoğlu , Abdurahman Küçükönder , Ekrem Oral

{"title":"Positional factors affecting the bond failure rates in orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Ömer Hatipoğlu , Abdurahman Küçükönder , Ekrem Oral","doi":"10.1016/j.odw.2019.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to make a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigated the effects of positional factors on the bonding failure of brackets.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Electronic databases (PubMed, Web of science, Scopus) were searched by 3 independent researchers. Randomized studies comparing maxilla-mandibular region, anterior–posterior segments, and right-left arch were included in the meta-analysis. The odds ratio was used as the effect size. A two-tailed test was performed to compare the factors. Heterogeneity was calculated with the Cochran Q test and I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Association was found between bonding failure and dental regions (OR=1.24, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.46) (p=0.009) and between bonding failure and anterior–posterior segments, too (OR=1.96, 95% CI: 1.58, 2.45) (p<0.001). But, no association was found bonding failure and arch sides (OR=1.11, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.29) (p=0.26).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Clinicians should more care, especially when operating in the mandibular region and posterior segment. However, there is no difference between the left and right arch in terms of the loss of the bracket.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43169,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontic Waves","volume":"78 3","pages":"Pages 93-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.odw.2019.06.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontic Waves","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344024119300044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to make a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigated the effects of positional factors on the bonding failure of brackets.

Methods

Electronic databases (PubMed, Web of science, Scopus) were searched by 3 independent researchers. Randomized studies comparing maxilla-mandibular region, anterior–posterior segments, and right-left arch were included in the meta-analysis. The odds ratio was used as the effect size. A two-tailed test was performed to compare the factors. Heterogeneity was calculated with the Cochran Q test and I² statistics.

Results

Association was found between bonding failure and dental regions (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.46) (p = 0.009) and between bonding failure and anterior–posterior segments, too (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.58, 2.45) (p < 0.001). But, no association was found bonding failure and arch sides (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.29) (p = 0.26).

Conclusion

Clinicians should more care, especially when operating in the mandibular region and posterior segment. However, there is no difference between the left and right arch in terms of the loss of the bracket.

查看原文本刊更多论文

正畸治疗中影响牙合失败率的位置因素:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

目的本研究的目的是系统回顾和荟萃分析研究的位置因素对托槽粘接失效的影响。方法3名独立研究者对PubMed、Web of science、Scopus等电子数据库进行检索。meta分析包括比较上颌区、前后节段和左右弓的随机研究。采用优势比作为效应量。采用双侧检验对各因素进行比较。采用Cochran Q检验和I2统计量计算异质性。结果粘接失败与牙区相关(OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.46) (p = 0.009)，粘接失败与前后牙段相关(OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.58, 2.45) (p <0.001)。但是，未发现粘接失败与弓侧相关(OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.29) (p = 0.26)。结论临床医生尤其在下颌骨及后段手术时应多加小心。然而，就支架的丢失而言，左右弓之间没有区别。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Orthodontic Waves DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Orthodontic Waves is the official publication of the Japanese Orthodontic Society. The aim of this journal is to foster the advancement of orthodontic research and practice. The journal seeks to publish original articles (i) definitive reports of wide interest to the orthodontic community, (ii) Case Reports and (iii) Short Communications. Research papers stand on the scientific basis of orthodontics. Clinical topics covered include all techniques and approaches to treatment planning. All submissions are subject to peer review.