Doses to Organs at Risk Calculated Using Plato and Oncentra Softwares in Intracavitary Brachytherapy

C. Chiang, N. Abdullah, R. Abdullah, M. Mohamad, A. Zakaria
{"title":"Doses to Organs at Risk Calculated Using Plato and Oncentra Softwares in Intracavitary Brachytherapy","authors":"C. Chiang, N. Abdullah, R. Abdullah, M. Mohamad, A. Zakaria","doi":"10.17576/JSKM-2021-1901-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a retrospective study, the organ doses to the bladder and rectum were compared between Nucletron PLATO V14.2.3 (BV) and newer version software Oncentra MasterPlan V4.3 (OMP) treatment planning systems (TPS). The treatment data of 32 intracavitary brachytherapy patients at Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia from January 2010 to June 2015 were used. These data sets were used for catheter reconstruction for both PLATO and OMP TPS followed by independent verification using Excel. There is no significant difference in mean doses to organs at risk (OARs) that calculated by both TPS (p>0.05). The mean percentage of doses calculated by PLATO TPS for bladder and rectum were 66.58 ± 27.42 %  and 46.27 ± 14.47 % respectively. While the mean percentage of doses for bladder and rectum calculated by OMP TPS were 65.68 ± 24.24 % and 46.46 ± 16.66 respectively. The mean percentage difference in doses comparison between independent verification calculation and PLATO TPS was 1.96 ± 6.00% and then became 6.37 ± 5.17% when it was compared with OMP TPS. Overall, the dose calculation differences for both versions of TPS were within the range recommended by Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The dose calculations of the two treatment planning systems showed good agreement and both could be used in planning intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Whereas Excel based independent verification suitable to be implemented as routine dose verification programme prior to treatment delivery. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JSKM-2021-1901-13","PeriodicalId":17686,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Sains Kesihatan Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Sains Kesihatan Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/JSKM-2021-1901-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is a retrospective study, the organ doses to the bladder and rectum were compared between Nucletron PLATO V14.2.3 (BV) and newer version software Oncentra MasterPlan V4.3 (OMP) treatment planning systems (TPS). The treatment data of 32 intracavitary brachytherapy patients at Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia from January 2010 to June 2015 were used. These data sets were used for catheter reconstruction for both PLATO and OMP TPS followed by independent verification using Excel. There is no significant difference in mean doses to organs at risk (OARs) that calculated by both TPS (p>0.05). The mean percentage of doses calculated by PLATO TPS for bladder and rectum were 66.58 ± 27.42 %  and 46.27 ± 14.47 % respectively. While the mean percentage of doses for bladder and rectum calculated by OMP TPS were 65.68 ± 24.24 % and 46.46 ± 16.66 respectively. The mean percentage difference in doses comparison between independent verification calculation and PLATO TPS was 1.96 ± 6.00% and then became 6.37 ± 5.17% when it was compared with OMP TPS. Overall, the dose calculation differences for both versions of TPS were within the range recommended by Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The dose calculations of the two treatment planning systems showed good agreement and both could be used in planning intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Whereas Excel based independent verification suitable to be implemented as routine dose verification programme prior to treatment delivery. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JSKM-2021-1901-13
使用Plato和Oncentra软件计算腔内近距离放射治疗中危及器官的剂量
回顾性比较了Nucletron PLATO V14.2.3 (BV)和更新版本的Oncentra MasterPlan V4.3 (OMP)治疗计划系统(TPS)对膀胱和直肠的器官剂量。选取2010年1月至2015年6月马来西亚圣士大学医院腔内近距离放疗患者32例的治疗资料。这些数据集用于PLATO和OMP TPS的导管重建,随后使用Excel进行独立验证。两种TPS计算的危及器官平均剂量(OARs)无显著差异(p < 0.05)。PLATO TPS计算膀胱和直肠的平均剂量百分比分别为66.58±27.42%和46.27±14.47%。OMP TPS计算膀胱和直肠的平均剂量百分比分别为65.68±24.24%和46.46±16.66。独立验证计算与PLATO TPS剂量比较的平均百分比差异为1.96±6.00%,与OMP TPS比较的平均百分比差异为6.37±5.17%。总体而言,两种版本的TPS的剂量计算差异在核管理委员会(NRC)推荐的范围内。两种治疗方案的剂量计算结果一致,均可用于宫颈癌腔内近距离放疗方案。而基于Excel的独立验证适合作为常规剂量验证程序在治疗前实施。DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JSKM-2021-1901-13
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信