The effects of various tillage systems on soil structure and root system development in wheat (Triticum durum Desf.).

Smain Echcherki, Mohamed Amine Feddal, R. Labad
{"title":"The effects of various tillage systems on soil structure and root system development in wheat (Triticum durum Desf.).","authors":"Smain Echcherki, Mohamed Amine Feddal, R. Labad","doi":"10.22453/lsj-022.2.165-184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of our study is to compare the effect of agricultural soil preparation on the physicomechanical properties of the soil and the consequences on the root system of wheat. To achieve these goals, three technical tillage chains (chain 1: deep tillage, chain 2: agronomic tillage, chain 3: no-tillage), were compared in the same pedoclimatic and historical situations. The experiment was carried out on silty clay soil in the experimental station of the National Higher School of Agronomy (Algiers). The results show that the techniques affect soil’s proprieties and the root system differently. The agronomic tillage has the best favorable effect on soil humidity, Bulk density, and soil Penetration resistance (11,1%; 50%; 0.6 MPa) (p-value :0,0001). Concerning the roots, the density, the diameter, and length were better when the soil is deeply tilled, non-tilled, or agronomical tilled, respectively (CH1:3.37 g/dm³; CH3:1.38 mm; CH2:12.23 cm). Examining all the results of this study has shown how tillage is reflected in and contributes to the farmer's orientation towards the right choice to optimize and conserve soil and water at the same time. Thus, under this study's experimental conditions, the technical itinerary of tillage with agronomic ploughing seems to be an alternative to conventional ploughing. This method of tillage is easily feasible from a technical point of view. Besides, it can generate economic gains compared to ploughing. However, its impacts on the soil and crop yields need to be studied in the longer term.","PeriodicalId":31081,"journal":{"name":"Lebanese Science Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lebanese Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22453/lsj-022.2.165-184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of our study is to compare the effect of agricultural soil preparation on the physicomechanical properties of the soil and the consequences on the root system of wheat. To achieve these goals, three technical tillage chains (chain 1: deep tillage, chain 2: agronomic tillage, chain 3: no-tillage), were compared in the same pedoclimatic and historical situations. The experiment was carried out on silty clay soil in the experimental station of the National Higher School of Agronomy (Algiers). The results show that the techniques affect soil’s proprieties and the root system differently. The agronomic tillage has the best favorable effect on soil humidity, Bulk density, and soil Penetration resistance (11,1%; 50%; 0.6 MPa) (p-value :0,0001). Concerning the roots, the density, the diameter, and length were better when the soil is deeply tilled, non-tilled, or agronomical tilled, respectively (CH1:3.37 g/dm³; CH3:1.38 mm; CH2:12.23 cm). Examining all the results of this study has shown how tillage is reflected in and contributes to the farmer's orientation towards the right choice to optimize and conserve soil and water at the same time. Thus, under this study's experimental conditions, the technical itinerary of tillage with agronomic ploughing seems to be an alternative to conventional ploughing. This method of tillage is easily feasible from a technical point of view. Besides, it can generate economic gains compared to ploughing. However, its impacts on the soil and crop yields need to be studied in the longer term.
不同耕作制度对小麦土壤结构和根系发育的影响。
我们研究的目的是比较农业整地对土壤物理力学性质的影响以及对小麦根系的影响。为了实现这些目标,在相同的土壤气候和历史条件下,对三种技术耕作链(链1:深耕,链2:农艺耕作,链3:免耕)进行了比较。该试验在阿尔及尔国立高等农业学院的试验站的粉质粘土上进行。结果表明,不同的处理方法对土壤性质和根系的影响不同。农艺耕作对土壤湿度、容重和土壤渗透阻力的影响最好(11,1%;50%;0.6MPa)(p值:00001)。关于根,当土壤深度耕作、未耕作或农业耕作时,密度、直径和长度分别更好(CH1:3.37 g/dm³;CH3:1.38 mm;CH2:12.23 cm)。检查这项研究的所有结果表明,耕作是如何反映并有助于农民在优化和保护水土的同时做出正确选择的。因此,在本研究的实验条件下,农艺翻耕的技术路线似乎是传统翻耕的替代方案。从技术角度来看,这种耕作方法很容易可行。此外,与耕地相比,它可以带来经济收益。然而,它对土壤和作物产量的影响需要长期研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信