Implementation and evaluation of the five-level emergency triage (emergency severity index tool): A hospital-based, prospective, observational study

Q3 Nursing
Harish Kodisiddaiah Shivanna, A. Ramesh, Keshava Murthy M Rangaswamy
{"title":"Implementation and evaluation of the five-level emergency triage (emergency severity index tool): A hospital-based, prospective, observational study","authors":"Harish Kodisiddaiah Shivanna, A. Ramesh, Keshava Murthy M Rangaswamy","doi":"10.34172/jept.2021.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To implement the 5-level Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage tool into nursing practice in the emergency department (ED) and validate it with a population-based cohort using hospitalization and length of stay (LOS) as outcome measures. Methods: The study included 850 patients, irrespective of age and gender, reporting to the ED of a tertiary care hospital. Each patient was assessed by the triage nurse as per the 5-level ESI triage tool and categorized. The number and type of resources used by the patient, LOS in the ED and the outcome were noted. Data were statistically analyzed by using RStudio Team software, 2015. A P value of<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: The majority of patients belonged to ESI-4 (46.82%), followed by ESI-1 (19.41%), ESI-2 (17.06%), ESI-3 (10.35%), and ESI-5 (6.35%). In most patients, the LOS in the ED was<120 minutes (55.65%). ESI showed a statistically significant association with all the clinical characteristics, as well as resources used, interventions needed, maximum time allowed before initiating physician assessment, duration of stay in ED, and patient outcomes (P=0.000). ESI was found to have a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 78%. Conclusion: ESI is a useful and valid tool for the emergency triage and has the potential to become the standard triage acuity assessment in EDs in India.","PeriodicalId":36499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jept.2021.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To implement the 5-level Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage tool into nursing practice in the emergency department (ED) and validate it with a population-based cohort using hospitalization and length of stay (LOS) as outcome measures. Methods: The study included 850 patients, irrespective of age and gender, reporting to the ED of a tertiary care hospital. Each patient was assessed by the triage nurse as per the 5-level ESI triage tool and categorized. The number and type of resources used by the patient, LOS in the ED and the outcome were noted. Data were statistically analyzed by using RStudio Team software, 2015. A P value of<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: The majority of patients belonged to ESI-4 (46.82%), followed by ESI-1 (19.41%), ESI-2 (17.06%), ESI-3 (10.35%), and ESI-5 (6.35%). In most patients, the LOS in the ED was<120 minutes (55.65%). ESI showed a statistically significant association with all the clinical characteristics, as well as resources used, interventions needed, maximum time allowed before initiating physician assessment, duration of stay in ED, and patient outcomes (P=0.000). ESI was found to have a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 78%. Conclusion: ESI is a useful and valid tool for the emergency triage and has the potential to become the standard triage acuity assessment in EDs in India.
五级急诊分诊(急诊严重程度指数工具)的实施和评估:一项基于医院的前瞻性观察性研究
目的:将5级急诊严重程度指数(ESI)分诊工具应用于急诊科(ED)的护理实践,并以住院和住院时间(LOS)为结果指标,在基于人群的队列中进行验证。方法:该研究包括850名向三级护理医院急诊科报告的患者,不分年龄和性别。分诊护士根据5级ESI分诊工具对每位患者进行评估并进行分类。记录患者使用的资源的数量和类型、ED中的LOS和结果。使用RStudio团队软件对数据进行统计分析,2015年。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:大多数患者属于ESI-4(46.82%),其次是ESI-1(19.41%)、ESI-2(17.06%)、ESI-3(10.35%)和ESI-5(6.35%)。在大多数患者中,ED的LOS<120分钟(55.65%),开始医师评估前允许的最长时间、ED住院时间和患者结果(P=0.000)。ESI的敏感性为100%,特异性为78%。结论:ESI是一种有用而有效的急诊分诊工具,有可能成为印度ED的标准分诊视力评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma
Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信