Psychometric Analysis of CCAPS-34 Scores With a Large University Sample

IF 2 4区心理学 Q2 Psychology

Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development Pub Date : 2020-12-04 DOI:10.1080/07481756.2020.1843971

M. Sherman, Julie Sriken, Bradley T. Erford, Heather L. Smith, Erin K. MacInerney, F. Niarhos, Adriana Kipper-Smith

引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Analysis of CCAPS-34 scores on a large (n = 4,852) university counseling center student sample supported internal consistency (α = .803-.896), one-month test-retest reliability (rtt = .706–.829), convergent and divergent validity, and good model fit. Measurement invariance of scores for all categories of race and student status was supported.

查看原文本刊更多论文

大样本高校CCAPS-34分的心理测量分析

摘要CCAPS-34分数在大样本(n = 4,852)大学心理咨询中心学生样本上的分析支持内部一致性(α = .803 ~ .896)、一个月重测信度(rtt = .706 ~ .829)、收敛效度和分歧效度以及良好的模型拟合。所有类别的种族和学生身份分数的测量不变性得到支持。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development Multiple-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development is an official journal of the Association of Assessment and Research in Counseling (AARC), a member association and division of the American Counseling Association. Articles range in appeal from those that deal with theoretical and other problems of the measurement specialist to those directed to the administrator, the counselor, or the personnel worker--in schools and colleges, public and private agencies, business, industry, and government. All articles clearly describe implications for the counseling field and for practitioners, educators, administrators, researchers, or students in assessment, measurement, and evaluation.