Pojęcie wolności w optyce dychotomii swoi–obcy w tekstach sowieckiego ideologicznego subdyskursu o kulturze lat 1953–1957

Piotr Zemszał
{"title":"Pojęcie wolności w optyce dychotomii swoi–obcy w tekstach sowieckiego ideologicznego subdyskursu o kulturze lat 1953–1957","authors":"Piotr Zemszał","doi":"10.17651/socjoling.33.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The term of freedom belongs to crucial social, ethical and moral issues in the Russian languaculture. Its dichotomous structure is reflected in two basic embodiments: воля and свобода. An issue crucial for understanding its functioning in conditions of totalitarianism is taking into account the actual perception of freedom by senders, and an analysis of the rhetorical use of this concept in propaganda and documentary texts. On a basis of the analysed material it can be said that the dichotomy of свобода — воля, traditional for the Russian languaculture, underwent significant reinterpretation under the analysed discourse, first by elimination of its second components as implying a lack of restrictions, while having a positive meaning, and thus being potentially harmful from the system propaganda point of view, and then by updating the three categories corresponding to three basic groups mentioned in the discourse. US (FRIENDS ) is the first of these categories, to which настоящая свобода corresponds, THEM (STRAN GERS , an external enemy мнимая свобода) form the second of these categories, while the third one describes THEM (STRAN GERS , an internal enemy, произвол).","PeriodicalId":34847,"journal":{"name":"Socjolingwistyka","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socjolingwistyka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17651/socjoling.33.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The term of freedom belongs to crucial social, ethical and moral issues in the Russian languaculture. Its dichotomous structure is reflected in two basic embodiments: воля and свобода. An issue crucial for understanding its functioning in conditions of totalitarianism is taking into account the actual perception of freedom by senders, and an analysis of the rhetorical use of this concept in propaganda and documentary texts. On a basis of the analysed material it can be said that the dichotomy of свобода — воля, traditional for the Russian languaculture, underwent significant reinterpretation under the analysed discourse, first by elimination of its second components as implying a lack of restrictions, while having a positive meaning, and thus being potentially harmful from the system propaganda point of view, and then by updating the three categories corresponding to three basic groups mentioned in the discourse. US (FRIENDS ) is the first of these categories, to which настоящая свобода corresponds, THEM (STRAN GERS , an external enemy мнимая свобода) form the second of these categories, while the third one describes THEM (STRAN GERS , an internal enemy, произвол).
1953-1957年苏联文化意识形态次话语文本中陌生人二分法视角下的自由概念
自由一词在俄语文化中属于重要的社会、伦理和道德问题。其二分结构反映在两个基本实施例中:воля和свобода。要了解其在极权主义条件下的作用,一个至关重要的问题是考虑到寄件人对自由的实际看法,并分析在宣传和纪录片文本中对这一概念的修辞使用。在分析材料的基础上,可以说,作为俄罗斯语言文化传统的свобода - воля的二分法,在分析的话语下经历了重大的重新诠释,首先是通过消除其第二成分,因为它意味着缺乏限制,虽然具有积极的意义,因此从系统宣传的角度来看是有害的,然后通过更新三个类别对应于话语中提到的三个基本群体。US (FRIENDS)是这些类别中的第一个,与настоящая свобода对应,THEM (STRAN GERS,外部敌人мнимая свобода)构成这些类别中的第二个,而第三个描述他们(STRAN GERS,内部敌人произвол)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书