Gender analysis in measurement materials: Critical thinking ability and science processing skills

D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan*, Endah Febri Setiya Rini
{"title":"Gender analysis in measurement materials: Critical thinking ability and science processing skills","authors":"D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan*, Endah Febri Setiya Rini","doi":"10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v11i1.11509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine whether there is a relationship and difference between science process skills and students' critical thinking skills based on gender. This type of research is descriptive quantitative research. The instruments used observation sheets and essay test questions. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling with samples of 90 students. The data analysis technique used by the researcher was descriptive statistics of Pearson Correlation and ANOVA tests. The results obtained were that the science process skills of students at SMPN 2 Batanghari were classified as good and dominated by female students with a percentage of 80.4%. Critical thinking skills were dominated by female students with a percentage of 32.6% (very critical). Then, there was a significant relationship between science process skills and students' critical thinking skills. Then, in the ANOVA test, male and female students' p-values of science process skills and critical thinking skills were less than 0.05. Therefore, there was a difference between the scientific process and the critical thinking skills of female and male students. This research is expected to contribute to schools and further research to improve learning methods that support critical thinking and science process skills.","PeriodicalId":31460,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika AlBiruni","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika AlBiruni","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v11i1.11509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether there is a relationship and difference between science process skills and students' critical thinking skills based on gender. This type of research is descriptive quantitative research. The instruments used observation sheets and essay test questions. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling with samples of 90 students. The data analysis technique used by the researcher was descriptive statistics of Pearson Correlation and ANOVA tests. The results obtained were that the science process skills of students at SMPN 2 Batanghari were classified as good and dominated by female students with a percentage of 80.4%. Critical thinking skills were dominated by female students with a percentage of 32.6% (very critical). Then, there was a significant relationship between science process skills and students' critical thinking skills. Then, in the ANOVA test, male and female students' p-values of science process skills and critical thinking skills were less than 0.05. Therefore, there was a difference between the scientific process and the critical thinking skills of female and male students. This research is expected to contribute to schools and further research to improve learning methods that support critical thinking and science process skills.
测量材料中的性别分析:批判性思维能力和科学处理技能
本研究旨在确定科学过程技能与学生批判性思维技能之间是否存在基于性别的关系和差异。这种类型的研究是描述性定量研究。测试工具采用了观察纸和论述题。采用的抽样方法是有目的抽样,样本为90名学生。研究人员使用的数据分析技术是Pearson相关和ANOVA检验的描述性统计。结果表明,巴登哈里中学第二阶段学生的科学处理技能为良好,女生占多数,占80.4%。批判性思维技能以女生为主,占32.6%(非常批判性)。科学过程技能与学生批判性思维技能之间存在显著的相关关系。然后,在ANOVA检验中,男女学生的科学过程技能和批判性思维技能的p值均小于0.05。因此,男女学生的科学过程和批判性思维能力存在差异。这项研究有望为学校和进一步的研究做出贡献,以改善支持批判性思维和科学过程技能的学习方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信