Speaker’s verbal behavior and collective audience responses in Korean political oratory

IF 0.8 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Language and Dialogue Pub Date : 2021-03-18 DOI:10.1075/LD.00090.CHO

Hyangmi Choi, Peter Bull

引用次数: 3

Abstract

An analysis was conducted of the discourse of South Korean political speakers in relation to collective audience responses, based on three situational contexts. Results showed marked contextual differences in the formatting of messages used to invite audience responses. In campaign speeches, explicit (dialogic) rhetorical devices (RDs) occurred most frequently, thereby supporting Bull and Miskinis’ (2015) hypothesis that such RDs are characteristic of political speech-making in collectivist far eastern societies. However, this hypothesis was substantively qualified by findings that (1) in the acceptance and inauguration speeches, implicit RDs were utilized more frequently than explicit (dialogic) RDs, and (2) in those two contexts, it was non-formatted messages that occurred more frequently than either explicit or implicit RDs separately.

查看原文本刊更多论文

韩国政治演讲中演讲者的言语行为与听众的集体反应

基于三种情境，分析了韩国政治发言人的话语与听众集体反应的关系。结果显示，用于邀请观众回复的信息格式存在显著的上下文差异。在竞选演讲中，显性（对话）修辞手法（RD）出现得最频繁，从而支持了Bull和Miskinis（2015）的假设，即这种修辞手法是集体主义远东社会政治演讲的特征。然而，这一假设在实质上得到了以下研究结果的证实：（1）在接受演讲和就职典礼演讲中，隐式RD比显式（对话）RD更频繁地使用，（2）在这两种情况下，非格式信息比显式或隐式RD分别更频繁地出现。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Language and Dialogue LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： In our post-Cartesian times human abilities are regarded as integrated and interacting abilities. Speaking, thinking, perceiving, having emotions need to be studied in interaction. Integration and interaction take place in dialogue. Scholars are called upon to go beyond reductive methods of abstraction and division and to take up the challenge of coming to terms with the complex whole. The conclusions drawn from reasoning about human behaviour in the humanities and social sciences have finally been proven by experiments in the natural sciences, especially neurology and sociobiology. What happens in the black box, can now, at least in part, be made visible. The journal intends to be an explicitly interdisciplinary journal reaching out to any discipline dealing with human abilities on the basis of consilience or the unity of knowledge. It is the challenge of post-Cartesian science to tackle the issue of how body, mind and language are interconnected and dialogically put to action. The journal invites papers which deal with ‘language and dialogue’ as an integrated whole in different languages and cultures and in different areas: everyday, institutional and literary, in theory and in practice, in business, in court, in the media, in politics and academia. In particular the humanities and social sciences are addressed: linguistics, literary studies, pragmatics, dialogue analysis, communication and cultural studies, applied linguistics, business studies, media studies, studies of language and the law, philosophy, psychology, cognitive sciences, sociology, anthropology and others. The journal Language and Dialogue is a peer reviewed journal and associated with the book series Dialogue Studies, edited by Edda Weigand.