The Claims of Politics on the Arts? Oakeshott and Scrutiny in the 1930s

IF 0.4 4区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION Pub Date : 2021-11-11 DOI:10.5406/jaesteduc.55.4.0060

Michael Rushton

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:In 1939, under pressure to take a more definitive political position, the editors of the literary journal Scrutiny, under the leadership of F. R. Leavis, convened a symposium titled "The Claims of Politics," on the question of whether political advocacy had a place in a journal dedicated to literature and the arts. This remains a salient question to the present day. This paper considers the circumstances that led to the symposium and specifically considers the contribution of conservative political philosopher Michael Oakeshott and his position that the introduction of politics into the arts would serve neither well.

查看原文本刊更多论文

政治对艺术的主张？20世纪30年代的奥克肖特和斯克鲁蒂尼

摘要：1939年，在采取更明确的政治立场的压力下，文学杂志《Scrutine》的编辑们在F.R.Leavis的领导下，召开了一次题为“政治主张”的研讨会，讨论政治倡导在一本致力于文学和艺术的杂志中是否有一席之地的问题。时至今日，这仍然是一个突出的问题。本文考虑了导致此次研讨会的环境，并特别考虑了保守派政治哲学家迈克尔·奥克肖特的贡献，以及他认为将政治引入艺术既没有好处的立场。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Aesthetic Education (JAE) is a highly respected interdisciplinary journal that focuses on clarifying the issues of aesthetic education understood in its most extensive meaning. The journal thus welcomes articles on philosophical aesthetics and education, to problem areas in education critical to arts and humanities at all institutional levels; to an understanding of the aesthetic import of the new communications media and environmental aesthetics; and to an understanding of the aesthetic character of humanistic disciplines. The journal is a valuable resource not only to educators, but also to philosophers, art critics and art historians.