The Optimal Mix? Presentation Order Affects Preference Ratings of Vocal Amplitude Levels in Popular Music

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Anna Lena Knoll, Kai Siedenburg
{"title":"The Optimal Mix? Presentation Order Affects Preference Ratings of Vocal Amplitude Levels in Popular Music","authors":"Anna Lena Knoll, Kai Siedenburg","doi":"10.1177/20592043221142712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mixing popular music is a complex task requiring the consideration of artistic goals, as well as preferences of both the mixing engineer and potential listeners. Vocals are of particular importance in the mixing process. Here, we tested whether listeners possess stable preferences for the mixing level of vocals, whether these preferences are subject to order effects, and the extent to which individual differences between listeners play a role. In Experiments 1 and 2 participants rated which of two mixes in a pair of song excerpts (unchanged reference versus comparison mix with adjusted vocal level) they preferred. Each excerpt pair was presented in two orders – reference first and comparison first. Generally, listeners preferred increased vocal levels and showed pronounced primacy effects, yielding higher ratings for the mix that was presented first. To circumvent order effects, Experiment 3 presented and asked for a rating of only one excerpt at a time and showed ratings similar to reference-first excerpt pairs in Experiments 1 and 2. No systematic influences of demographic variables were observed. However, we found two clusters of participants that differed in their overall preferences, with one group showing stronger preferences for higher vocal levels. The present findings underscore the role of listening history of the immediate past in complex auditory tasks such as evaluating the level of a salient sound source in a musical mixture.","PeriodicalId":33047,"journal":{"name":"Music Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Music Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20592043221142712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Mixing popular music is a complex task requiring the consideration of artistic goals, as well as preferences of both the mixing engineer and potential listeners. Vocals are of particular importance in the mixing process. Here, we tested whether listeners possess stable preferences for the mixing level of vocals, whether these preferences are subject to order effects, and the extent to which individual differences between listeners play a role. In Experiments 1 and 2 participants rated which of two mixes in a pair of song excerpts (unchanged reference versus comparison mix with adjusted vocal level) they preferred. Each excerpt pair was presented in two orders – reference first and comparison first. Generally, listeners preferred increased vocal levels and showed pronounced primacy effects, yielding higher ratings for the mix that was presented first. To circumvent order effects, Experiment 3 presented and asked for a rating of only one excerpt at a time and showed ratings similar to reference-first excerpt pairs in Experiments 1 and 2. No systematic influences of demographic variables were observed. However, we found two clusters of participants that differed in their overall preferences, with one group showing stronger preferences for higher vocal levels. The present findings underscore the role of listening history of the immediate past in complex auditory tasks such as evaluating the level of a salient sound source in a musical mixture.
最佳组合?呈现顺序影响流行音乐中声音振幅等级的偏好等级
混合流行音乐是一项复杂的任务,需要考虑艺术目标,以及混合工程师和潜在听众的偏好。声乐在混音过程中尤为重要。在这里,我们测试了听众是否对人声的混合水平有稳定的偏好,这些偏好是否受到顺序效应的影响,以及听众之间的个体差异在多大程度上发挥了作用。在实验1和2中,参与者对一对歌曲节选中的两种混音(不变的参考混音与调整了音量的比较混音)中的哪一种进行了评分。每个摘录对按两个顺序呈现——参考优先,比较优先。一般来说,听众更喜欢提高音量,并表现出明显的首要效应,从而为最先呈现的混音带来更高的收视率。为了避免顺序效应,实验3一次只提出并要求一个摘录的评级,并且显示出与实验1和2中的参考第一摘录对相似的评级。没有观察到人口统计学变量的系统影响。然而,我们发现两组参与者的总体偏好不同,其中一组对更高的嗓音表现出更强的偏好。目前的研究结果强调了过去的听力史在复杂听觉任务中的作用,例如评估音乐混合物中显著声源的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Music  Science
Music Science Arts and Humanities-Music
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信