Privilege as Policy? An Analysis of Student Religious Accommodation Policies in Higher Education

Gordon Maples, Leah Rediger, Jenny L. Small
{"title":"Privilege as Policy? An Analysis of Student Religious Accommodation Policies in Higher Education","authors":"Gordon Maples, Leah Rediger, Jenny L. Small","doi":"10.1080/2194587X.2021.1977151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study examines student religious accommodation policies from 36 universities in the United States. These policies were analyzed for their implications on equity, diversity, and inclusion; manifestations of Christian normativity; inclusiveness of all religious, secular, and spiritual identities; and for any notable patterns. Findings indicated areas of concern within these policies. Many policies required students from marginalized traditions to disclose details of their beliefs and practices to their professors in order to receive accommodation consideration, some policies provided no form of appeals in the case of a denial, and others raised further concerns through their wordings or applications.","PeriodicalId":89967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of college and character","volume":"22 1","pages":"272 - 290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of college and character","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2194587X.2021.1977151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This study examines student religious accommodation policies from 36 universities in the United States. These policies were analyzed for their implications on equity, diversity, and inclusion; manifestations of Christian normativity; inclusiveness of all religious, secular, and spiritual identities; and for any notable patterns. Findings indicated areas of concern within these policies. Many policies required students from marginalized traditions to disclose details of their beliefs and practices to their professors in order to receive accommodation consideration, some policies provided no form of appeals in the case of a denial, and others raised further concerns through their wordings or applications.
特权作为政策?高等教育学生宗教适应政策探析
摘要本研究调查了美国36所大学的学生宗教住宿政策。分析了这些政策对公平、多样性和包容性的影响;基督教规范性的表现;包容所有宗教、世俗和精神身份;以及任何显著的图案。调查结果表明了这些政策中令人关切的领域。许多政策要求来自边缘化传统的学生向教授披露他们的信仰和实践细节,以便获得通融考虑,一些政策在拒绝的情况下没有提供任何形式的上诉,另一些政策则通过他们的措辞或申请提出了进一步的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书