A novel experimental-theoretical method to improve MMP estimation using VIT technique

2区 工程技术 Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Ali Safaei , Masoud Riazi , Saman Shariat
{"title":"A novel experimental-theoretical method to improve MMP estimation using VIT technique","authors":"Ali Safaei ,&nbsp;Masoud Riazi ,&nbsp;Saman Shariat","doi":"10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>In the gas injection process<span> for enhanced oil recovery (EOR), the interfacial tension (IFT) and the </span></span>minimum miscibility pressure<span> (MMP) are two key parameters for evaluating the miscibility condition. The vanishing interfacial tension (VIT) method is an efficient method for measuring the interfacial tension of oil and gas versus pressure and can estimate the minimum miscibility pressure. A problem in the VIT test of a hydrocarbon system is that during this test, oil and gas densities vary due to the composition variation of both phases. But in the conventional interfacial measurement, this issue is ignored, and the initial and non-equilibrium densities are utilized for estimating the interfacial tension. In this study, it is tried to nominate a novel method for estimating the most accurate value of IFT. Hence, for this purpose, first a VIT test has been performed for a hydrocarbon gas and a live oil system and using the axisymmetric drop shape analysis (ADSA), the </span></span>oil droplet has been analyzed, and the </span>geometry factor<span>, which has been defined in this paper, was calculated. After that, the volume of oil droplet and the gas have been measured and were used for vapor-liquid-equilibrium (VLE) or flash calculation using Peng-Robinson equation of state (PR-EOS). By VLE calculation fulfillment, the final composition of two phases is determined. Eventually, the densities of two phases have been calculated for VIT modification. Finally, the IFT results were plotted versus the pressure steps, and the MMP were estimated. Furthermore, to evaluate the results of VIT test and its modification, slim tube displacement (STD) test, which is known as the most reliable laboratory method for measuring the MMP in the oil industry, has been performed. The results show that the values obtained for MMP values for the VIT test with the corrected densities which are lower than the values obtained for the VIT test for not-corrected densities and the suggested experimental-theoretical method has been estimated the MMP more accurately. The MMP obtained by VIT test and modified VIT method was equal to 3858.72 and 3722.0 psi, respectively. Meanwhile, the slim tube test has measured the MMP equal to 3667.13 psi.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":16717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 111182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920410522010348","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the gas injection process for enhanced oil recovery (EOR), the interfacial tension (IFT) and the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) are two key parameters for evaluating the miscibility condition. The vanishing interfacial tension (VIT) method is an efficient method for measuring the interfacial tension of oil and gas versus pressure and can estimate the minimum miscibility pressure. A problem in the VIT test of a hydrocarbon system is that during this test, oil and gas densities vary due to the composition variation of both phases. But in the conventional interfacial measurement, this issue is ignored, and the initial and non-equilibrium densities are utilized for estimating the interfacial tension. In this study, it is tried to nominate a novel method for estimating the most accurate value of IFT. Hence, for this purpose, first a VIT test has been performed for a hydrocarbon gas and a live oil system and using the axisymmetric drop shape analysis (ADSA), the oil droplet has been analyzed, and the geometry factor, which has been defined in this paper, was calculated. After that, the volume of oil droplet and the gas have been measured and were used for vapor-liquid-equilibrium (VLE) or flash calculation using Peng-Robinson equation of state (PR-EOS). By VLE calculation fulfillment, the final composition of two phases is determined. Eventually, the densities of two phases have been calculated for VIT modification. Finally, the IFT results were plotted versus the pressure steps, and the MMP were estimated. Furthermore, to evaluate the results of VIT test and its modification, slim tube displacement (STD) test, which is known as the most reliable laboratory method for measuring the MMP in the oil industry, has been performed. The results show that the values obtained for MMP values for the VIT test with the corrected densities which are lower than the values obtained for the VIT test for not-corrected densities and the suggested experimental-theoretical method has been estimated the MMP more accurately. The MMP obtained by VIT test and modified VIT method was equal to 3858.72 and 3722.0 psi, respectively. Meanwhile, the slim tube test has measured the MMP equal to 3667.13 psi.

Abstract Image

利用VIT技术改进MMP估算的一种新的实验理论方法
在提高采收率的注气过程中,界面张力(IFT)和最小混相压力(MMP)是评价混相条件的两个关键参数。消失界面张力(VIT)法是一种测量油气界面张力与压力关系的有效方法,可以估计最小混溶压力。碳氢化合物系统的VIT测试中的一个问题是,在该测试过程中,由于两相的组成变化,油气密度发生变化。但在传统的界面测量中,这一问题被忽略了,而是利用初始密度和非平衡密度来估计界面张力。在本研究中,试图提出一种新的方法来估计IFT的最准确值。因此,为此,首先对烃类气体和活油系统进行了VIT测试,并使用轴对称液滴形状分析(ADSA)对油滴进行了分析,并计算了本文中定义的几何因子。然后,测量油滴和气体的体积,并使用Peng-Robinson状态方程(PR-EOS)进行汽液平衡(VLE)或闪蒸计算。通过VLE计算的实现,确定了两相的最终组成。最后,计算了VIT改性的两相密度。最后,绘制了IFT结果与压力阶跃的关系图,并估计了MMP。此外,为了评估VIT测试及其修改的结果,进行了细管位移(STD)测试,该测试被认为是石油工业中测量MMP最可靠的实验室方法。结果表明,具有校正密度的VIT试验获得的MMP值低于未校正密度的VIT试验获得的值,并且建议的实验理论方法已经更准确地估计了MMP。通过VIT试验和改良的VIT方法获得的MMP分别等于3858.72和3722.0 psi。同时,细管试验测得MMP等于3667.13 psi。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1511
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering, the geology and the science of petroleum and natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of petroleum engineering, natural gas engineering and petroleum (natural gas) geology. An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering covers the fields of petroleum (and natural gas) exploration, production and flow in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of petroleum and natural gas; petroleum geochemistry; reservoir engineering; reservoir simulation; rock mechanics; petrophysics; pore-level phenomena; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced oil and gas recovery; petroleum geology; compaction/diagenesis; petroleum economics; drilling and drilling fluids; thermodynamics and phase behavior; fluid mechanics; multi-phase flow in porous media; production engineering; formation evaluation; exploration methods; CO2 Sequestration in geological formations/sub-surface; management and development of unconventional resources such as heavy oil and bitumen, tight oil and liquid rich shales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信