Modelling the effect of spray breakup, coalescence and evaporation on vehicle surface contamination dynamics

Q2 Engineering
Anton Kabanovs, A. Garmory, M. Passmore, A. Gaylard
{"title":"Modelling the effect of spray breakup, coalescence and evaporation on vehicle surface contamination dynamics","authors":"Anton Kabanovs, A. Garmory, M. Passmore, A. Gaylard","doi":"10.4271/2018-01-0705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vehicle surface contamination is an important design consideration as it affects drivers' vision and the performance of on board camera and sensor systems. Previous work has shown that eddy resolving methods are able to accurately capture the flow field and particle transport, leading to good agreement for vehicle soiling with experiments. What is less clear is whether the secondary break-up, coalescence and evaporation of liquid particles play an important role in spray dynamics. The work reported here attempts to answer this and also give an idea of the computational cost associated with these extra physics models. A quarter scale generic SUV model is used as a test case in which the continuous phase is solved using the Spalart-Allmaras IDDES model. The dispersed phase is computed concurrently with the continuous phase using the Lagrangian approach. The TAB secondary break-up and the stochastic O'Rourke coalescence models are used. The spray's rate of evaporation is calculated based on the relative humidity encountered on a typical October day in Britain. The secondary break-up model is found to be redundant, possibly due to the properties of spray. The coalescence model predicts high coalescence of particles close to the source and improves agreement with experiment, although at a high computational cost. Including evaporation removes small particles from the simulation and reduces overall contamination. When used along the coalescence model, evaporation is found to be negligible as it does not influence large particles to the same extent as it affects small particles. This suggests that droplet physics models need to be considered together as they can have a strong effect on each other as well as vehicle soiling. Here, we show that coalescence can be accounted for by using the time-averaged spray, obtained outside the region of high coalescence. This gives a very good agreement with experiment.","PeriodicalId":44634,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Electronic and Electrical Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4271/2018-01-0705","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Electronic and Electrical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Vehicle surface contamination is an important design consideration as it affects drivers' vision and the performance of on board camera and sensor systems. Previous work has shown that eddy resolving methods are able to accurately capture the flow field and particle transport, leading to good agreement for vehicle soiling with experiments. What is less clear is whether the secondary break-up, coalescence and evaporation of liquid particles play an important role in spray dynamics. The work reported here attempts to answer this and also give an idea of the computational cost associated with these extra physics models. A quarter scale generic SUV model is used as a test case in which the continuous phase is solved using the Spalart-Allmaras IDDES model. The dispersed phase is computed concurrently with the continuous phase using the Lagrangian approach. The TAB secondary break-up and the stochastic O'Rourke coalescence models are used. The spray's rate of evaporation is calculated based on the relative humidity encountered on a typical October day in Britain. The secondary break-up model is found to be redundant, possibly due to the properties of spray. The coalescence model predicts high coalescence of particles close to the source and improves agreement with experiment, although at a high computational cost. Including evaporation removes small particles from the simulation and reduces overall contamination. When used along the coalescence model, evaporation is found to be negligible as it does not influence large particles to the same extent as it affects small particles. This suggests that droplet physics models need to be considered together as they can have a strong effect on each other as well as vehicle soiling. Here, we show that coalescence can be accounted for by using the time-averaged spray, obtained outside the region of high coalescence. This gives a very good agreement with experiment.
模拟了喷雾破碎、聚结和蒸发对车辆表面污染动力学的影响
车辆表面污染是一个重要的设计考虑因素,因为它会影响驾驶员的视力以及车载摄像头和传感器系统的性能。以前的工作表明,涡流解析方法能够准确地捕获流场和颗粒输运,从而使车辆污染与实验结果很好地吻合。但不太清楚的是,液体颗粒的二次破裂、聚并和蒸发是否在喷雾动力学中起重要作用。这里报告的工作试图回答这个问题,并给出与这些额外物理模型相关的计算成本的想法。以1 / 4比例的通用SUV车型为例,采用Spalart-Allmaras IDDES模型求解连续相位。用拉格朗日方法计算离散相和连续相。采用TAB二次破碎模型和随机O'Rourke聚结模型。喷雾的蒸发速度是根据英国典型的10月一天的相对湿度计算的。发现二次破碎模型是多余的,可能是由于喷雾的性质。该聚结模型预测了靠近源的粒子高度聚结,提高了与实验的一致性,尽管计算成本较高。包括蒸发从模拟中去除小颗粒,减少整体污染。当沿着聚结模型使用时,发现蒸发可以忽略不计,因为它对大颗粒的影响程度不如对小颗粒的影响程度。这表明液滴物理模型需要一起考虑,因为它们可以对彼此以及车辆污染产生强烈影响。在这里,我们证明了聚结可以通过使用时间平均喷雾来解释,在高聚结区域之外获得。这与实验结果非常吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信