Remediation of a Beneficial Use Impairment at Bluffer’s Park Beach in the Toronto Area of Concern

IF 0.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
T. Edge, S. Hill, A. Crowe, J. Marsalek, P. Seto, B. Snodgrass, R. Toninger, M. Patel
{"title":"Remediation of a Beneficial Use Impairment at Bluffer’s Park Beach in the Toronto Area of Concern","authors":"T. Edge, S. Hill, A. Crowe, J. Marsalek, P. Seto, B. Snodgrass, R. Toninger, M. Patel","doi":"10.1080/14634988.2018.1497401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bluffer’s Park Beach in the Toronto and Region Area of Concern had a history of beach postings often exceeding 80% of the beach season since the 1980s. A study applied expanded E. coli surveillance and microbial source tracking techniques in 2005–2007 to identify fecal pollution sources contributing to beach postings. Expanded surveillance in the beach vicinity identified significant E. coli hotspots in the foreshore beach sand (pore water max E. coli = 255,000 CFU 100 ml−1) and associated with a marsh inland of the beach. During rain events, streams from the marsh (max E. coli = 173,000 CFU 100 ml−1) and runoff from the parking lot (max E. coli = 4100 CFU 100 ml−1) were observed to overflow across the beach to contaminate beach waters. Microbial source tracking using library-dependent (antibiotic resistance and rep-PCR DNA fingerprinting of E. coli isolates) and library-independent (human HF183 bacterial DNA marker) methods indicated the prevalence of animal fecal pollution sources at the beach rather than human sewage. These results were consistent with sanitary survey information, observations of wildlife in the marsh area, and Gulls and Canada Geese on the beach. In 2006, a bird management program was initiated, and remedial actions continued in advance of the 2008 bathing season to engineer a berm to prevent marsh runoff into beach water and re-direct parking lot drainage into the marsh. Since these remediation actions, Bluffer’s Park Beach has been posted less than 20% of each beach season, and it was awarded a Blue Flag accreditation in 2011.","PeriodicalId":8125,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management","volume":"21 1","pages":"285 - 292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14634988.2018.1497401","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14634988.2018.1497401","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Bluffer’s Park Beach in the Toronto and Region Area of Concern had a history of beach postings often exceeding 80% of the beach season since the 1980s. A study applied expanded E. coli surveillance and microbial source tracking techniques in 2005–2007 to identify fecal pollution sources contributing to beach postings. Expanded surveillance in the beach vicinity identified significant E. coli hotspots in the foreshore beach sand (pore water max E. coli = 255,000 CFU 100 ml−1) and associated with a marsh inland of the beach. During rain events, streams from the marsh (max E. coli = 173,000 CFU 100 ml−1) and runoff from the parking lot (max E. coli = 4100 CFU 100 ml−1) were observed to overflow across the beach to contaminate beach waters. Microbial source tracking using library-dependent (antibiotic resistance and rep-PCR DNA fingerprinting of E. coli isolates) and library-independent (human HF183 bacterial DNA marker) methods indicated the prevalence of animal fecal pollution sources at the beach rather than human sewage. These results were consistent with sanitary survey information, observations of wildlife in the marsh area, and Gulls and Canada Geese on the beach. In 2006, a bird management program was initiated, and remedial actions continued in advance of the 2008 bathing season to engineer a berm to prevent marsh runoff into beach water and re-direct parking lot drainage into the marsh. Since these remediation actions, Bluffer’s Park Beach has been posted less than 20% of each beach season, and it was awarded a Blue Flag accreditation in 2011.
对多伦多关注地区布拉夫公园海滩有益使用损害的补救
自20世纪80年代以来,多伦多和地区关注区的布拉夫公园海滩的海滩张贴率经常超过海滩季节的80%。2005-2007年的一项研究应用了扩展的大肠杆菌监测和微生物来源跟踪技术,以确定导致海滩张贴的粪便污染源。在海滩附近扩大的监测发现,在前海岸海滩沙子中存在显著的大肠杆菌热点(孔隙水最大大肠杆菌= 255,000 CFU 100 ml - 1),并与海滩内陆沼泽有关。在降雨期间,来自沼泽的溪流(最大大肠杆菌= 173,000 CFU 100 ml - 1)和来自停车场的径流(最大大肠杆菌= 4100 CFU 100 ml - 1)被观察到溢出海滩,污染海滩水域。利用文库依赖法(大肠杆菌菌株的抗生素耐药性和rep-PCR DNA指纹图谱)和文库独立法(人HF183细菌DNA标记物)对微生物源进行追踪,发现海滩主要是动物粪便污染源,而非人类污水。这些结果与卫生调查资料、沼泽地区野生动物的观察以及海滩上海鸥和加拿大鹅的观察结果一致。2006年,政府启动了一项鸟类管理计划,并在2008年的沐浴季节之前继续采取补救措施,设计一条护堤,防止沼泽径流流入海滩水,并将停车场的排水重新引导到沼泽中。自采取这些整治措施以来,布拉夫公园海滩每个海滩季节的污染率不到20%,并于2011年获得了蓝旗认证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management
Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles on the following themes and topics: • Original articles focusing on ecosystem-based sciences, ecosystem health and management of marine and aquatic ecosystems • Reviews, invited perspectives and keynote contributions from conferences • Special issues on important emerging topics, themes, and ecosystems (climate change, invasive species, HABs, risk assessment, models)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信