From the Ground Up: Building a Culture of Research in an Academic Library

Jenessa M. McElfresh, M. Albro, K. M. Sheffield
{"title":"From the Ground Up: Building a Culture of Research in an Academic Library","authors":"Jenessa M. McElfresh, M. Albro, K. M. Sheffield","doi":"10.18060/25629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ARTICLE FOCUS: This article discusses the motivations, benefits, and actions taken to create and support a culture of research among library employees at a R1 University Library system. \nBACKGROUND: Despite substantial pressures to publish and engage in library science research, many academic librarians lack the training or support to build their own research agendas. This is particularly worrisome as tenure requirements and professional trends require librarians to be knowledgeable and productive in their research dissemination. At [REDACTED] University Libraries, librarians responded to this problem by adapting evidence-based solutions from scientific and medical disciplines to fit the research empowerment needs of a burgeoning R1 library system.  \nREFLECTION: The process of building a productive culture of research at [REDACTED] Libraries was a multi-year endeavor that took considerable initiative, planning, and flexibility.  Each of the initiatives required adaptation to the knowledge levels and existing culture in the Libraries. Organizers had to be willing to make changes and attempt new approaches as the organization evolved and comfort with the research process grew. Some initiatives, like Writing Circle, were disbanded, while others, like Journal Club and Research Roundtable, continue to develop with high levels of engagement. \nCONCLUSIONS: The success of this progressive approach to fostering a thriving culture of research at [REDACTED] Libraries is evident through the rates of participation, dissemination, and satisfaction of library employees, in addition to the expansion of libraries’ engagement with research in outside departments and disciplines. Librarians who seek to enhance their own institution’s research culture should consider implementing some or all of these initiatives to jumpstart their efforts, including writing circles, journal clubs, and research roundtables.","PeriodicalId":89380,"journal":{"name":"Hypothesis (University of Toronto. Dept. of Medical Biophysics)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypothesis (University of Toronto. Dept. of Medical Biophysics)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/25629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ARTICLE FOCUS: This article discusses the motivations, benefits, and actions taken to create and support a culture of research among library employees at a R1 University Library system. BACKGROUND: Despite substantial pressures to publish and engage in library science research, many academic librarians lack the training or support to build their own research agendas. This is particularly worrisome as tenure requirements and professional trends require librarians to be knowledgeable and productive in their research dissemination. At [REDACTED] University Libraries, librarians responded to this problem by adapting evidence-based solutions from scientific and medical disciplines to fit the research empowerment needs of a burgeoning R1 library system.  REFLECTION: The process of building a productive culture of research at [REDACTED] Libraries was a multi-year endeavor that took considerable initiative, planning, and flexibility.  Each of the initiatives required adaptation to the knowledge levels and existing culture in the Libraries. Organizers had to be willing to make changes and attempt new approaches as the organization evolved and comfort with the research process grew. Some initiatives, like Writing Circle, were disbanded, while others, like Journal Club and Research Roundtable, continue to develop with high levels of engagement. CONCLUSIONS: The success of this progressive approach to fostering a thriving culture of research at [REDACTED] Libraries is evident through the rates of participation, dissemination, and satisfaction of library employees, in addition to the expansion of libraries’ engagement with research in outside departments and disciplines. Librarians who seek to enhance their own institution’s research culture should consider implementing some or all of these initiatives to jumpstart their efforts, including writing circles, journal clubs, and research roundtables.
从头开始:构建高校图书馆的研究文化
文章焦点:本文讨论了在R1大学图书馆系统的图书馆员工中创建和支持研究文化的动机、好处和采取的行动。背景:尽管出版和从事图书馆学研究面临巨大压力,但许多学术图书馆员缺乏建立自己的研究议程的培训或支持。这尤其令人担忧,因为任期要求和专业趋势要求图书馆员在研究传播中知识渊博、富有成效。在[REDACTED]大学图书馆,图书馆员通过调整科学和医学学科的循证解决方案来应对这一问题,以满足新兴R1图书馆系统的研究授权需求。反思:[REDACTED]图书馆建立富有成效的研究文化的过程是一项多年的努力,需要相当大的主动性、计划性和灵活性。每一项举措都需要适应图书馆的知识水平和现有文化。随着组织的发展和对研究过程的适应,组织者必须愿意做出改变并尝试新的方法。一些倡议,如写作圈,已经解散,而其他倡议,如期刊俱乐部和研究圆桌会议,继续以高水平的参与度发展。结论:这种循序渐进的方法在[REDACTED]图书馆培养繁荣的研究文化方面取得了成功,这一点通过图书馆员工的参与率、传播率和满意度以及图书馆对外部部门和学科研究的参与度的扩大而体现出来。寻求加强自己机构研究文化的图书馆员应该考虑实施部分或全部这些举措,以启动他们的工作,包括写作圈、期刊俱乐部和研究圆桌会议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信