Exploring Patterns of Social Relationships among Food Bloggers on Twitter Using a Social Network Analysis Approach

Q2 Social Sciences
Allison D. Hepworth, Jessica Kropczynski, Justin A. Walden, Rachel A. Smith
{"title":"Exploring Patterns of Social Relationships among Food Bloggers on Twitter Using a Social Network Analysis Approach","authors":"Allison D. Hepworth, Jessica Kropczynski, Justin A. Walden, Rachel A. Smith","doi":"10.21307/joss-2019-038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background and objective. Nutrition information conveyed by popular entities through online social networking sites (i.e., social media influencers) has the potential to impact consumer eating behavior through mechanisms of social influence. Little is known about how online communities of food-related social media influencers are structured, which could reveal influencers’ opportunities to observe and spread nutrition-related content and information design practices. This study explored patterns of social relationships (social capital, conservation of resources, and homophily) within a network of prominent food bloggers on Twitter (N = 44). Methods. Data on Twitter following/follower relationships and Twitter use (number of tweets, favorited tweets) were collected from bloggers’ Twitter profiles. Bloggers represented eight topical subcategories of food blogs (e.g., family cooking, cocktails) and comprised a one-mode social network with directed ties indicating Twitter following/follower relationships. Structural evidence of patterns of social relationships was investigated through social network visualization, centrality measures (in-degree/out-degree centrality, density, reciprocity), and inferential tests. Results. The overall network density of directed ties was 21%, with wide variability in individual blogger centrality across multiple measures. Cocktails, cooking, special diets, and culinary travel bloggers had more dense ties to bloggers in their own subcategories. Within the network, favorited tweets and outreach (Twitter following relationships) were positively associated with popularity (Twitter follower relationships). Conclusions. Food bloggers in this study formed a partially connected network, supporting the conservation of resources framework. Homophily was evident in some, but not all, topical subcategories. Associations among Twitter use, outreach, and popularity generally supported the social capital framework. Future studies should explore influencers’ motivations for connecting on social networking sites, and how content and information design practices spread among influencers.","PeriodicalId":35236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Structure","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Structure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/joss-2019-038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Background and objective. Nutrition information conveyed by popular entities through online social networking sites (i.e., social media influencers) has the potential to impact consumer eating behavior through mechanisms of social influence. Little is known about how online communities of food-related social media influencers are structured, which could reveal influencers’ opportunities to observe and spread nutrition-related content and information design practices. This study explored patterns of social relationships (social capital, conservation of resources, and homophily) within a network of prominent food bloggers on Twitter (N = 44). Methods. Data on Twitter following/follower relationships and Twitter use (number of tweets, favorited tweets) were collected from bloggers’ Twitter profiles. Bloggers represented eight topical subcategories of food blogs (e.g., family cooking, cocktails) and comprised a one-mode social network with directed ties indicating Twitter following/follower relationships. Structural evidence of patterns of social relationships was investigated through social network visualization, centrality measures (in-degree/out-degree centrality, density, reciprocity), and inferential tests. Results. The overall network density of directed ties was 21%, with wide variability in individual blogger centrality across multiple measures. Cocktails, cooking, special diets, and culinary travel bloggers had more dense ties to bloggers in their own subcategories. Within the network, favorited tweets and outreach (Twitter following relationships) were positively associated with popularity (Twitter follower relationships). Conclusions. Food bloggers in this study formed a partially connected network, supporting the conservation of resources framework. Homophily was evident in some, but not all, topical subcategories. Associations among Twitter use, outreach, and popularity generally supported the social capital framework. Future studies should explore influencers’ motivations for connecting on social networking sites, and how content and information design practices spread among influencers.
用社交网络分析方法探讨推特上美食博客的社交关系模式
摘要背景和目的。流行实体通过在线社交网站(即社交媒体影响者)传达的营养信息有可能通过社会影响机制影响消费者的饮食行为。人们对食品相关社交媒体影响者的在线社区是如何构建的知之甚少,这可能会揭示影响者观察和传播营养相关内容和信息设计实践的机会。这项研究探讨了推特上著名美食博主网络中的社会关系模式(社会资本、资源保护和同性恋)(N=44)。方法。从博主的推特个人资料中收集了推特关注/追随者关系和推特使用情况(推特数量、受欢迎推特)的数据。博客代表了美食博客的八个主题子类别(例如,家庭烹饪、鸡尾酒),并构成了一个单一模式的社交网络,具有指示推特粉丝/追随者关系的定向关系。通过社交网络可视化、中心性测量(度内/度外中心性、密度、互易性)和推理测试,研究了社会关系模式的结构证据。后果定向联系的总体网络密度为21%,在多个衡量标准中,个人博客中心性的差异很大。鸡尾酒、烹饪、特殊饮食和烹饪旅行博主与自己子类别的博主有着更紧密的联系。在网络中,受欢迎的推文和外联(推特粉丝关系)与受欢迎程度(推特追随者关系)呈正相关。结论。在这项研究中,美食博主形成了一个部分连接的网络,支持资源保护框架。在某些(但不是所有)主题子类别中,同质性是明显的。推特的使用、推广和受欢迎程度之间的关联通常支持社会资本框架。未来的研究应该探索影响者在社交网站上建立联系的动机,以及内容和信息设计实践如何在影响者中传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Social Structure
Journal of Social Structure Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信