Albumin-bilirubin score versus Child-Pugh score as predictors of posthepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Yongchao Zeng, C. Dai, X. Bu, Hongda Ding
{"title":"Albumin-bilirubin score versus Child-Pugh score as predictors of posthepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma patients","authors":"Yongchao Zeng, C. Dai, X. Bu, Hongda Ding","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the perioperative risk factors for posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). \n \n \nMethods \nData of 322 cases of liver resection for HCC were retrospectively analyzed from Sep 2013 to Sep 2018. Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for PHLF. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the predictive power of the ALBI score and the Child-Pugh score for PHLF. \n \n \nResults \nChild-Pugh score, ALBI score, intraoperative bleeding amount, ICG R15 and liver fibrosis, peritoneal effusion were independent factors affecting PHLF of HCC patients(P<0.05). ROC analysis of Child-Pugh and ALBI scores predicting PHLF showed that area under the ROC was respectively 0.621 (95% CI: 0.531-0.712) in the Child-Pugh score and 0.729(95% CI: 0.645-0.812)in the ALBI score. The best critical value, sensitivity and specificity of PHLF that were predicted by ALBI score were -2.74, 71.7% and 71.4%, respectively. \n \n \nConclusions \nThe prognostic power of the ALBI score was greater than that of the Child-Pugh score in predicting PHLF. \n \n \nKey words: \nCarcinoma, hepatocellular; Hepatctomy; Liver failure","PeriodicalId":66425,"journal":{"name":"中华普通外科杂志","volume":"34 1","pages":"649-651"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华普通外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.08.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To investigate the perioperative risk factors for posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). Methods Data of 322 cases of liver resection for HCC were retrospectively analyzed from Sep 2013 to Sep 2018. Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for PHLF. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the predictive power of the ALBI score and the Child-Pugh score for PHLF. Results Child-Pugh score, ALBI score, intraoperative bleeding amount, ICG R15 and liver fibrosis, peritoneal effusion were independent factors affecting PHLF of HCC patients(P<0.05). ROC analysis of Child-Pugh and ALBI scores predicting PHLF showed that area under the ROC was respectively 0.621 (95% CI: 0.531-0.712) in the Child-Pugh score and 0.729(95% CI: 0.645-0.812)in the ALBI score. The best critical value, sensitivity and specificity of PHLF that were predicted by ALBI score were -2.74, 71.7% and 71.4%, respectively. Conclusions The prognostic power of the ALBI score was greater than that of the Child-Pugh score in predicting PHLF. Key words: Carcinoma, hepatocellular; Hepatctomy; Liver failure
白蛋白-胆红素评分与Child-Pugh评分对肝癌患者肝切除术后肝功能衰竭的预测作用
目的探讨肝细胞癌(HCC)患者肝切除术后肝功能衰竭(PHLF)的围手术期危险因素。方法回顾性分析2013年9月至2018年9月收治的322例HCC肝切除患者的临床资料。采用Logistic回归分析PHLF的危险因素。受试者工作特性(ROC)曲线用于分析ALBI评分和Child-Pugh评分对PHLF的预测能力。结果Child-Pugh评分、ALBI评分、术中出血量、ICG R15和肝纤维化、腹腔积液是影响HCC患者PHLF的独立因素(P<0.05)。Child-Pugh和ALBI评分预测PHLF的ROC分析显示,Child-Pugh得分ROC下面积分别为0.621(95%CI:0.531-0.712)和0.729(95%CI:0.645-0.812)。ALBI评分预测PHLF的最佳临界值、敏感性和特异性分别为-2.74、71.7%和71.4%。结论ALBI评分对PHLF的预测能力大于Child-Pugh评分。关键词:肝癌;肝切除术;肝功能衰竭
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9825
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信