Kazakhstani History Education Considered via Textbooks’ War Narratives, with a Focus on the “Great Patriotic War”

IF 0.2 Q3 HISTORY
A. Satanov, Burkitbay G. Ayagan, G. Mussabalina
{"title":"Kazakhstani History Education Considered via Textbooks’ War Narratives, with a Focus on the “Great Patriotic War”","authors":"A. Satanov, Burkitbay G. Ayagan, G. Mussabalina","doi":"10.1163/22879811-12340127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe article is devoted to how history is taught in Kazakhstan. We take a concrete example: how the complex history of World War II, a topic that has been highly ideologized in Soviet historiography, is presented in the history textbooks of the post-Soviet period. The study defines how the history of the Great Patriotic War – that is, the Soviet Union’s struggle against the Nazis – has undergone conceptual transformations to varying extents in the textbooks of the countries of the former “socialist camp,” with our focus being Kazakhstan. Additionally, the model of Kazakhstan’s education is essential, as the country has yet to be left out of a definitive history of education narratives. For example, after analyzing history textbooks, it is possible to identify how students’ historical memory about one of the most catastrophic wars has been formed. Our interdisciplinary study used content analysis and “opening up the textbook” to identify types of qualitative models of history textbooks’ content about the war. In addition, the authors analyzed the coverage of the war in textbooks in various historical fields and branches belonging to different stages of Kazakhstan’s educational reforms. One result stood clear, namely that history education has been the subject of frequent debate in Kazakhstan, with the debates indicating how the state apparatus has managed a national approach that teaches a history productive of good patriots. On the other hand, teaching history also has its technocratic justification, as a means for students to acquire necessary skills.","PeriodicalId":41200,"journal":{"name":"Asian Review of World Histories","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Review of World Histories","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22879811-12340127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to how history is taught in Kazakhstan. We take a concrete example: how the complex history of World War II, a topic that has been highly ideologized in Soviet historiography, is presented in the history textbooks of the post-Soviet period. The study defines how the history of the Great Patriotic War – that is, the Soviet Union’s struggle against the Nazis – has undergone conceptual transformations to varying extents in the textbooks of the countries of the former “socialist camp,” with our focus being Kazakhstan. Additionally, the model of Kazakhstan’s education is essential, as the country has yet to be left out of a definitive history of education narratives. For example, after analyzing history textbooks, it is possible to identify how students’ historical memory about one of the most catastrophic wars has been formed. Our interdisciplinary study used content analysis and “opening up the textbook” to identify types of qualitative models of history textbooks’ content about the war. In addition, the authors analyzed the coverage of the war in textbooks in various historical fields and branches belonging to different stages of Kazakhstan’s educational reforms. One result stood clear, namely that history education has been the subject of frequent debate in Kazakhstan, with the debates indicating how the state apparatus has managed a national approach that teaches a history productive of good patriots. On the other hand, teaching history also has its technocratic justification, as a means for students to acquire necessary skills.
从教材战争叙事看哈萨克斯坦历史教育——以“伟大卫国战争”为中心
这篇文章专门介绍了哈萨克斯坦如何教授历史。我们举一个具体的例子:苏联史学高度意识形态化的第二次世界大战的复杂历史是如何在后苏联时期的历史教科书中呈现的。这项研究定义了伟大卫国战争的历史——即苏联与纳粹的斗争——在前“社会主义阵营”国家的教科书中如何发生不同程度的概念转变,我们的重点是哈萨克斯坦。此外,哈萨克斯坦的教育模式至关重要,因为该国尚未被排除在明确的教育叙事史之外。例如,在分析历史教科书后,可以确定学生对最具灾难性的战争之一的历史记忆是如何形成的。我们的跨学科研究使用内容分析和“开放教科书”来确定历史教科书关于战争内容的定性模型类型。此外,作者分析了哈萨克斯坦教育改革不同阶段的各个历史领域和分支的教科书中对战争的报道。一个结果很明显,即历史教育在哈萨克斯坦一直是经常争论的主题,这些争论表明国家机构是如何管理一种国家方法的,这种方法教授一部培养优秀爱国者的历史。另一方面,历史教学也有其技术官僚的理由,作为学生获得必要技能的一种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信