La corte, los validos, privados secretarios y consejeros en la historiografía jurídica y política de los siglos XVI y XVII

Q3 Arts and Humanities

Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI:10.4067/s0716-54552019000100527

Marina Rojo Gallego-Burín

{"title":"La corte, los validos, privados secretarios y consejeros en la historiografía jurídica y política de los siglos XVI y XVII","authors":"Marina Rojo Gallego-Burín","doi":"10.4067/s0716-54552019000100527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolResumen Los tratados juridico-politicos de la Edad Moderna constituyen una fuente primaria a la que es imprescindible acudir para estudiar de la burocracia de la epoca, un tiempo que se caracterizo por lo fructifero que fue en la impresion de libros de contenido juridico y politico. Gran parte de ellos fueron elaborados por miembros de la burocracia y los convirtieron en un medio para expresar su opinion y valoracion, en ocasiones critica, de la realidad. En aras de contribuir al estudio de la modernidad, en este trabajo analizamos diversos tratados para descubrir la perspectiva que tenian sus autores sobre la Corte, los validos, privados y otros miembros de la burocracia. EnglishAbstract The legal-political books of the Modern Age are an essential primary source essential to study the bureaucracy of the time, a time that was characterized by the impression of many books devoted to politics and law. Most of the books were written by members of the administration and turned them into a means to express their opinion and valuation, sometimes critical. We have the purpose of contributing to the study of modernity and we will analyze various treaties to discover the perspective they provide on the court, the valid, private and other members of the administration.","PeriodicalId":35307,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-54552019000100527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

espanolResumen Los tratados juridico-politicos de la Edad Moderna constituyen una fuente primaria a la que es imprescindible acudir para estudiar de la burocracia de la epoca, un tiempo que se caracterizo por lo fructifero que fue en la impresion de libros de contenido juridico y politico. Gran parte de ellos fueron elaborados por miembros de la burocracia y los convirtieron en un medio para expresar su opinion y valoracion, en ocasiones critica, de la realidad. En aras de contribuir al estudio de la modernidad, en este trabajo analizamos diversos tratados para descubrir la perspectiva que tenian sus autores sobre la Corte, los validos, privados y otros miembros de la burocracia. EnglishAbstract The legal-political books of the Modern Age are an essential primary source essential to study the bureaucracy of the time, a time that was characterized by the impression of many books devoted to politics and law. Most of the books were written by members of the administration and turned them into a means to express their opinion and valuation, sometimes critical. We have the purpose of contributing to the study of modernity and we will analyze various treaties to discover the perspective they provide on the court, the valid, private and other members of the administration.

查看原文本刊更多论文

法院，16世纪和17世纪法律和政治史学中的有效、私人秘书和顾问

西班牙人总结说，现代的法律和政治条约是研究当时官僚机构的主要来源，而这个时代的特点是在印刷法律和政治内容的书籍方面是多么富有成果。其中许多是由官僚机构成员编写的，使其成为表达他们对现实的看法和评估的手段，有时是批评现实的手段。为了帮助研究现代性，在这篇文章中，我们分析了各种条约，以发现其作者对法院、有效的、私人的和其他官僚机构成员的看法。英语摘要现代的法律-政治书籍是研究当时官僚制度的基本基本原始资料，这个时代的特点是许多致力于政治和法律的书籍给人留下了深刻的印象。大多数书是由政府成员写的，并成为表达意见和评估的手段，有时是批评的。我们的目的是为现代性研究做出贡献，我们将分析各种条约，以发现它们对法院、有效法院、私人法院和其他政府成员的看法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos Arts and Humanities-History

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The aim of Revista de Estudios Histórico-Jurídicos (abbreviation REHJ, for Historical-Legal Studies Journal) is to spread original and unpublished articles regarding dogmatic, legislative and institutional history in the fields of Roman Law and Legal History, especially in the European and Ibero-American Romanistic tradition; and of History of Western legal and political thought; even if these are lectures given at scientific congresses. It also accepts revisions regarding the status of an issue and broad bibliographic revisions, as long as they are of a critical nature. The Journal does not publish works of a purely philosophical, theoretical, political or sociological content; neither publishes works of a mere outreach nature, whether they consist in non-reprocessed lectures or conferences as articles, nor if they offer the assay form ("reflections", "remarks", "considerations", "note-taking", "notes" etc.). General Coverage on the Following Topics: Roman law, History of (public and private) Law, History of canon law, History of European law, Indian Law (History of the legal system applied in the Americas during the Spanish colonisation), History of the Ibero-American national laws, History of Chilean law, History of the legal dogmas, History of the legal thought, History of the political thought, History of institutions.