Constitucionalización del Código General Disciplinario en Colombia

IF 1.2 Q1 LAW
Maria Stephania Aponte, Jairo Vladimir Llano Franco, Giovanni Sánchez Espinosa
{"title":"Constitucionalización del Código General Disciplinario en Colombia","authors":"Maria Stephania Aponte, Jairo Vladimir Llano Franco, Giovanni Sánchez Espinosa","doi":"10.17981/JURIDCUC.17.1.2021.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on the constitutionalization that brings with it the entry into force of Law 1952 of 2019, through which the General Disciplinary Code is introduced into legal life, becoming a state tool that in its first part recognizes the importance of the implementation of the purposes, principles and values, for the correct performance of functions by public officials and the procedures for when the conduct is outside the legal system, even in the same law the possibility of linking principles and rights from international treaties and conventions through the constitutionality block, allowing more complex cases to be intervened from international law. The general objective of the research: to analyze the relevant changes that occurred with the new disciplinary regime. The implemented methodology is supported by the hermeneutical method and the interpretation technique, to expose the reasons why disciplinary law frames its principles from the Constitution; these types of methods and techniques are recognized as qualitative. The results are the demonstration of the constitutionalization and the slight incidence of international law in Colombian disciplinary law. The constitutional and socio-legal transformations of the disciplinary code enable the efficiency of public servants before their institutional responsibilities. This perspective of constitutionalization and principles in the Disciplinary Code makes this article innovative","PeriodicalId":40796,"journal":{"name":"Juridicas CUC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridicas CUC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17981/JURIDCUC.17.1.2021.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article focuses on the constitutionalization that brings with it the entry into force of Law 1952 of 2019, through which the General Disciplinary Code is introduced into legal life, becoming a state tool that in its first part recognizes the importance of the implementation of the purposes, principles and values, for the correct performance of functions by public officials and the procedures for when the conduct is outside the legal system, even in the same law the possibility of linking principles and rights from international treaties and conventions through the constitutionality block, allowing more complex cases to be intervened from international law. The general objective of the research: to analyze the relevant changes that occurred with the new disciplinary regime. The implemented methodology is supported by the hermeneutical method and the interpretation technique, to expose the reasons why disciplinary law frames its principles from the Constitution; these types of methods and techniques are recognized as qualitative. The results are the demonstration of the constitutionalization and the slight incidence of international law in Colombian disciplinary law. The constitutional and socio-legal transformations of the disciplinary code enable the efficiency of public servants before their institutional responsibilities. This perspective of constitutionalization and principles in the Disciplinary Code makes this article innovative
哥伦比亚《一般纪律守则》的宪法化
这篇文章的重点是使2019年第1952号法律生效的宪法化,通过该法律,《一般纪律守则》被引入法律生活,成为一种国家工具,在其第一部分中承认实施宗旨、原则和价值观的重要性,对于公职人员正确履行职能以及行为超出法律体系时的程序,即使在同一法律中,也有可能通过合宪性块将国际条约和公约中的原则和权利联系起来,允许国际法介入更复杂的案件。研究的总体目标是:分析新的学科制度所发生的相关变化。实施方法论以解释学方法和解释技术为支撑,从宪法的角度揭示了纪律法确立原则的原因;这些类型的方法和技术被认为是定性的。其结果表明,哥伦比亚的纪律法具有宪法化和轻微的国际法倾向。《纪律守则》的宪法和社会法律改革使公务员的效率高于其机构责任。《纪律守则》中的宪法化和原则使本文具有创新性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信