Doxycycline Plus Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole versus Doxycycline plus Rifampicin in Treatment of Brucellosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

W. Hassan, M. Abdel-Gawad, A. Abdelmohsen
{"title":"Doxycycline Plus Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole versus Doxycycline plus Rifampicin in Treatment of Brucellosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"W. Hassan, M. Abdel-Gawad, A. Abdelmohsen","doi":"10.4103/azmj.azmj_61_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aim Brucellosis is one of the most common endemic zoonotic diseases that have large animal and human burden. Many regimens of drug combinations are used for a variable period (at least 6 weeks). Rifampicin with doxycycline is one of the most used combinations. In this respect, we aimed to compare between the efficacy of two different combinations: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combined with doxycycline (TMX-Doxy) versus rifampicin combined with doxycycline (Rif-Doxy). Patient and methods Between June 2020 and January 2022, 100 patients with brucellosis were included. Half of them (50 patients) received TMX-Doxy, whereas the other half (50 patients) received Rif-Doxy for 6 weeks. Follow-up was done during the treatment course and 6 months after the end of treatment to detect successfully treated cases, failed-to-treat cases, and relapsed cases. Results The success rates of both used drug regimens were comparable, with the rate of success of TMX-Doxy combination being 90%, whereas it was 94% in the RIF-Doxy group (P=0.23). The failure rate was 4% in the TMX-Doxy group and 2% in the RIF-Doxy group (P=0.31). Relapse of brucellosis was recorded in 6% of patients in the TMX-Doxy group, whereas it was 4% of patients in the RIF-Doxy group (P=0.32). The adverse effects of both drug combinations were mild and self-limited, and none of the enrolled patients needed to stop treatment. Conclusion Combination of TMX-Doxy is effective, safe, and not inferior to the more used RIF-Doxy combination.","PeriodicalId":7711,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"333 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/azmj.azmj_61_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim Brucellosis is one of the most common endemic zoonotic diseases that have large animal and human burden. Many regimens of drug combinations are used for a variable period (at least 6 weeks). Rifampicin with doxycycline is one of the most used combinations. In this respect, we aimed to compare between the efficacy of two different combinations: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combined with doxycycline (TMX-Doxy) versus rifampicin combined with doxycycline (Rif-Doxy). Patient and methods Between June 2020 and January 2022, 100 patients with brucellosis were included. Half of them (50 patients) received TMX-Doxy, whereas the other half (50 patients) received Rif-Doxy for 6 weeks. Follow-up was done during the treatment course and 6 months after the end of treatment to detect successfully treated cases, failed-to-treat cases, and relapsed cases. Results The success rates of both used drug regimens were comparable, with the rate of success of TMX-Doxy combination being 90%, whereas it was 94% in the RIF-Doxy group (P=0.23). The failure rate was 4% in the TMX-Doxy group and 2% in the RIF-Doxy group (P=0.31). Relapse of brucellosis was recorded in 6% of patients in the TMX-Doxy group, whereas it was 4% of patients in the RIF-Doxy group (P=0.32). The adverse effects of both drug combinations were mild and self-limited, and none of the enrolled patients needed to stop treatment. Conclusion Combination of TMX-Doxy is effective, safe, and not inferior to the more used RIF-Doxy combination.
多西环素加甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑与多西环肽加利福平治疗布鲁氏菌病的随机对照试验
背景与目的布鲁氏菌病是最常见的地方性人畜共患疾病之一,对动物和人类造成巨大负担。许多药物组合方案的使用时间不等(至少6周)。利福平与强力霉素是最常用的组合之一。在这方面,我们旨在比较两种不同组合的疗效:甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑联合强力霉素(TMX-Doxy)与利福平联合强力霉素(Rif-Doxy)。患者和方法2020年6月至2022年1月,纳入100例布鲁氏菌病患者。其中一半(50例)接受TMX-Doxy治疗,另一半(50例)接受Rif-Doxy治疗,疗程6周。在治疗期间和治疗结束后6个月进行随访,以发现治疗成功病例、治疗失败病例和复发病例。结果两种用药方案的成功率具有可比性,TMX-Doxy联合用药的成功率为90%,而RIF-Doxy联合用药的成功率为94% (P=0.23)。TMX-Doxy组失败率为4%,RIF-Doxy组为2% (P=0.31)。在TMX-Doxy组中,6%的患者复发布鲁氏菌病,而在RIF-Doxy组中,这一比例为4% (P=0.32)。两种药物组合的不良反应都是轻微且自限性的,并且没有入组的患者需要停止治疗。结论TMX-Doxy联合用药有效、安全,不逊于常用的RIF-Doxy联合用药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信