Reimaging Public-Private Partnership Model as Hybrid: South Africa Viewpoint

IF 1 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Alinaswe Sinkala, E. Ochieng, Diana Ominde, Tarila Zuofa, S. Badi
{"title":"Reimaging Public-Private Partnership Model as Hybrid: South Africa Viewpoint","authors":"Alinaswe Sinkala, E. Ochieng, Diana Ominde, Tarila Zuofa, S. Badi","doi":"10.1177/1087724X211046626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As significant increases in the financing of infrastructure and other resources will still be required to bridge the current infrastructure gap experienced globally, alternatives to the standard PPP infrastructure project delivery models are constantly appraised in several nations. This research examined the viability of reframing Public Private Partnership (PPP) frameworks as hybrid PPP alliances (HPPPA), which would enhance current PPP practices and enable practitioners in South Africa to deliver PPP infrastructure projects more efficiently. The research adopted a two-pronged qualitative data collection approach, utilizing semi-structured interviews as well as case studies to obtain empirical evidence that was compared to secondary data on how PPP practices in South Africa can be enhanced. The research established that while the South African PPP legislations was adjudged as being suitable, the delivery framework was found to be highly costly and comprised of long approval processes.","PeriodicalId":45483,"journal":{"name":"Public Works Management & Policy","volume":"27 1","pages":"152 - 183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Works Management & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X211046626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As significant increases in the financing of infrastructure and other resources will still be required to bridge the current infrastructure gap experienced globally, alternatives to the standard PPP infrastructure project delivery models are constantly appraised in several nations. This research examined the viability of reframing Public Private Partnership (PPP) frameworks as hybrid PPP alliances (HPPPA), which would enhance current PPP practices and enable practitioners in South Africa to deliver PPP infrastructure projects more efficiently. The research adopted a two-pronged qualitative data collection approach, utilizing semi-structured interviews as well as case studies to obtain empirical evidence that was compared to secondary data on how PPP practices in South Africa can be enhanced. The research established that while the South African PPP legislations was adjudged as being suitable, the delivery framework was found to be highly costly and comprised of long approval processes.
将公私合作模式重塑为混合模式:南非观点
由于基础设施融资和其他资源的大幅增加仍将需要弥合目前全球基础设施的差距,一些国家正在不断评估标准PPP基础设施项目交付模式的替代方案。本研究考察了将公私伙伴关系(PPP)框架重新构建为混合PPP联盟(HPPPA)的可行性,这将加强当前的PPP实践,并使南非的从业者能够更有效地交付PPP基础设施项目。该研究采用了双管齐下的定性数据收集方法,利用半结构化访谈和案例研究来获得经验证据,并将其与关于如何加强南非PPP实践的二手数据进行比较。研究表明,虽然南非公私合作伙伴关系立法被认为是合适的,但交付框架被认为成本很高,并且包括漫长的审批过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Works Management & Policy
Public Works Management & Policy PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT & POLICY: RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN TRANSPORTATION, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND THE ENVIRONMENT is a peer-reviewed journal for academics and practitioners in public works and the public and private infrastructure industries. This journal addresses the planning, financing, development, and operations of civil infrastructure systems at all levels of society— from federal policy to the demand for, and delivery of, state and local public works services. PWMP solicits manuscripts that convey research results, evaluate management innovations, suggest methods of analysis and evaluation, and examine policy issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信