J. Skrzat, Michael Pechulis, Marcel DiFiore, Amanda Fink, George Fischer, Marian Jordan, Erika M Lebron, Alyssa Rieger
{"title":"FSS-ICU Scores at ICU Discharge Differ Across Postacute Care Dispositions","authors":"J. Skrzat, Michael Pechulis, Marcel DiFiore, Amanda Fink, George Fischer, Marian Jordan, Erika M Lebron, Alyssa Rieger","doi":"10.1097/JAT.0000000000000177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To determine whether Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit (FSS-ICU) scores acquired within 24 hours of medical-surgical intensive care unit (MSICU) discharge differ among postacute care discharge dispositions in a nonsurgical patient population. Methods: A retrospective medical record review for data collection was conducted over 12 months for patients in an MSICU. FSS-ICU scores were collected within 24 hours of MSICU discharge. Subjects were categorized into 4 postacute care discharge dispositions: home, subacute rehabilitation (SAR), inpatient rehabilitation (IP), or other. A 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc analyses were performed. Results: One hundred fifteen subjects were included. FSS-ICU scores acquired within 24 hours of MSICU discharge were significantly different (P < .001) between postacute care discharge dispositions. Post hoc analysis showed a statistically significant difference between home and SAR (P < .001), home and IP (P < .001), and home and other (P = .005). Conclusions: A difference was found in FSS-ICU scores acquired within 24 hours of MSICU discharge between home and all other postacute care discharge dispositions in a nonsurgical patient population. An FSS-ICU score less than 27 at MSICU discharge indicates that discharge planning to a postacute care discharge disposition other than home may be warranted.","PeriodicalId":42472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","volume":"13 1","pages":"77 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To determine whether Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit (FSS-ICU) scores acquired within 24 hours of medical-surgical intensive care unit (MSICU) discharge differ among postacute care discharge dispositions in a nonsurgical patient population. Methods: A retrospective medical record review for data collection was conducted over 12 months for patients in an MSICU. FSS-ICU scores were collected within 24 hours of MSICU discharge. Subjects were categorized into 4 postacute care discharge dispositions: home, subacute rehabilitation (SAR), inpatient rehabilitation (IP), or other. A 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc analyses were performed. Results: One hundred fifteen subjects were included. FSS-ICU scores acquired within 24 hours of MSICU discharge were significantly different (P < .001) between postacute care discharge dispositions. Post hoc analysis showed a statistically significant difference between home and SAR (P < .001), home and IP (P < .001), and home and other (P = .005). Conclusions: A difference was found in FSS-ICU scores acquired within 24 hours of MSICU discharge between home and all other postacute care discharge dispositions in a nonsurgical patient population. An FSS-ICU score less than 27 at MSICU discharge indicates that discharge planning to a postacute care discharge disposition other than home may be warranted.