FSS-ICU Scores at ICU Discharge Differ Across Postacute Care Dispositions

IF 0.5 Q4 REHABILITATION
J. Skrzat, Michael Pechulis, Marcel DiFiore, Amanda Fink, George Fischer, Marian Jordan, Erika M Lebron, Alyssa Rieger
{"title":"FSS-ICU Scores at ICU Discharge Differ Across Postacute Care Dispositions","authors":"J. Skrzat, Michael Pechulis, Marcel DiFiore, Amanda Fink, George Fischer, Marian Jordan, Erika M Lebron, Alyssa Rieger","doi":"10.1097/JAT.0000000000000177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To determine whether Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit (FSS-ICU) scores acquired within 24 hours of medical-surgical intensive care unit (MSICU) discharge differ among postacute care discharge dispositions in a nonsurgical patient population. Methods: A retrospective medical record review for data collection was conducted over 12 months for patients in an MSICU. FSS-ICU scores were collected within 24 hours of MSICU discharge. Subjects were categorized into 4 postacute care discharge dispositions: home, subacute rehabilitation (SAR), inpatient rehabilitation (IP), or other. A 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc analyses were performed. Results: One hundred fifteen subjects were included. FSS-ICU scores acquired within 24 hours of MSICU discharge were significantly different (P < .001) between postacute care discharge dispositions. Post hoc analysis showed a statistically significant difference between home and SAR (P < .001), home and IP (P < .001), and home and other (P = .005). Conclusions: A difference was found in FSS-ICU scores acquired within 24 hours of MSICU discharge between home and all other postacute care discharge dispositions in a nonsurgical patient population. An FSS-ICU score less than 27 at MSICU discharge indicates that discharge planning to a postacute care discharge disposition other than home may be warranted.","PeriodicalId":42472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit (FSS-ICU) scores acquired within 24 hours of medical-surgical intensive care unit (MSICU) discharge differ among postacute care discharge dispositions in a nonsurgical patient population. Methods: A retrospective medical record review for data collection was conducted over 12 months for patients in an MSICU. FSS-ICU scores were collected within 24 hours of MSICU discharge. Subjects were categorized into 4 postacute care discharge dispositions: home, subacute rehabilitation (SAR), inpatient rehabilitation (IP), or other. A 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc analyses were performed. Results: One hundred fifteen subjects were included. FSS-ICU scores acquired within 24 hours of MSICU discharge were significantly different (P < .001) between postacute care discharge dispositions. Post hoc analysis showed a statistically significant difference between home and SAR (P < .001), home and IP (P < .001), and home and other (P = .005). Conclusions: A difference was found in FSS-ICU scores acquired within 24 hours of MSICU discharge between home and all other postacute care discharge dispositions in a nonsurgical patient population. An FSS-ICU score less than 27 at MSICU discharge indicates that discharge planning to a postacute care discharge disposition other than home may be warranted.
ICU出院时的FSS-ICU评分因急症后护理处置而异
目的:确定在非手术患者群体中,在医疗外科重症监护室(MSICU)出院后24小时内获得的重症监护室功能状态评分(FSS-ICU)评分在急性护理出院后的处理方式之间是否存在差异。方法:对MSICU中的患者进行为期12个月的数据收集回顾性医疗记录审查。在MSICU出院后24小时内收集FSS-ICU评分。受试者被分为4种急性后护理出院处置:家庭、亚急性康复(SAR)、住院康复(IP)或其他。进行了单向方差分析和事后分析。结果:115名受试者被纳入研究。MSICU出院后24小时内获得的FSS-ICU评分在急性护理出院后处理之间存在显著差异(P<.001)。事后分析显示,家庭和SAR(P<.001)、家庭和IP(P<.001)以及家庭和其他(P=.005)之间存在统计学显著差异。结论:在非手术患者群体中,家庭和所有其他急性护理出院后处置之间,MSICU出院后24小时内获得的FSS-ICU评分存在差异。MSICU出院时FSS-ICU评分低于27表明,可能有必要对非家庭的急性后护理出院处置进行出院计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信