An Imagined Past: Initiation, Liturgical Secrecy, and "Mass of the Catechumens"

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
L. Boughton
{"title":"An Imagined Past: Initiation, Liturgical Secrecy, and \"Mass of the Catechumens\"","authors":"L. Boughton","doi":"10.1353/atp.2021.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Scholarly consensus holds that the Church of the second through fifth centuries treated baptism, confirmation, and the Eucharist as \"rites of Christian initiation\" and required that catechumens preparing for these sacraments be dismissed from Eucharistic celebrations according to a \"discipline of the secret\" (disciplina arcani). The consensus accepts the earliness and authenticity of documents designated as \"Church orders\" whose titles suggest that they transcribe traditions of \"apostolic\" origin that shaped patristic-era practice. Analysis of these documents, however, reveals anachronisms and differences among manuscript transmissions. Homilies and treatises attributed to Church Fathers that seem to confirm liturgical secrecy have appeared in modern translations, anthologies, and secondary studies that overlook cases of pseudepigraphy or, where a writing is authentic, are inattentive to the original language and/or early translations of its text. The concept of liturgical secrecy may be the product of modern hypothesis rather than objective evidence of patristic-era liturgical practice.","PeriodicalId":40281,"journal":{"name":"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal","volume":"25 1","pages":"161 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/atp.2021.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Scholarly consensus holds that the Church of the second through fifth centuries treated baptism, confirmation, and the Eucharist as "rites of Christian initiation" and required that catechumens preparing for these sacraments be dismissed from Eucharistic celebrations according to a "discipline of the secret" (disciplina arcani). The consensus accepts the earliness and authenticity of documents designated as "Church orders" whose titles suggest that they transcribe traditions of "apostolic" origin that shaped patristic-era practice. Analysis of these documents, however, reveals anachronisms and differences among manuscript transmissions. Homilies and treatises attributed to Church Fathers that seem to confirm liturgical secrecy have appeared in modern translations, anthologies, and secondary studies that overlook cases of pseudepigraphy or, where a writing is authentic, are inattentive to the original language and/or early translations of its text. The concept of liturgical secrecy may be the product of modern hypothesis rather than objective evidence of patristic-era liturgical practice.
想象中的过去:启蒙、礼仪秘密和“慕道者弥撒”
摘要:学界一致认为,公元二世纪至五世纪的教会将洗礼、坚信礼和圣餐礼视为“基督教启蒙仪式”,并要求根据“秘密纪律”(disciplina arcani)将准备这些圣事的慕道者从圣餐仪式中驱逐出去。共识接受被指定为“教会命令”的文件的早期和真实性,其标题表明它们转录了“使徒”起源的传统,这些传统塑造了教父时代的实践。然而,对这些文件的分析揭示了手稿传输中的时代错误和差异。被认为是教父的讲道和论文似乎证实了礼仪的秘密,这些都出现在现代翻译、选集和次要研究中,这些研究忽视了伪典的情况,或者,在一个写作是真实的情况下,不注意原始语言和/或早期翻译的文本。礼仪保密的概念可能是现代假设的产物,而不是教父时代礼仪实践的客观证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信