Secrets.

T. Stephany
{"title":"Secrets.","authors":"T. Stephany","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvh9vv49.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abigail Tarttelin’s heartbreaking coming-ofage novel, Golden Boy, addresses the complexities of identity development and its intersection with sexual violence. In her crusade to fill in the blanks of a fragmented life, Tartellin uses a multipleperspective narrative style to help the reader make sense of Max Walker, the beautiful boy whose entire life has been shaped by secrets. Told from the perspective of Max himself, his parents, his little brother, his new doctor, and the girl he ultimately ends up falling in love with, Golden Boy is a twofold tale about the often unspoken realities of intersexuality and rape. Tarttelin is an assertive storyteller who ensnares the reader in a web of emotions without much warning. In fact, the reader is suddenly plunged into a whirlwind of vivid imagery that perfectly captures the pain of a fracturing adolescence. Rape is a heinous crime against the body, and Tarttelin makes sure to evoke that by depicting Max’s rape as particularly savage: he was assaulted by Hunter, his best friend from childhood, after Hunter caught him masturbating. This in itself was particularly destabilizing for Max because, as a boy, he had been caught stimulating the part of his genitalia that more closely resembled a vagina—something he seldom did—and would now be potentially off-limits. In a horrific, yet not surprising manner, Hunter then utilizes Max’s previous actions to justify his own by telling Max that he is “more girl than boy,” and hence, “you are supposed to like me.” By framing the rape in this way, Tarttelin explores several tropes of heteronormative power. Firstly, she feminizes Max by exposing his most fragile vulnerability—his sex—and turns Hunter into the predatory male who uses Max’s biggest secret as a weapon to control and silence him, thereby reinforcing the ideology that violence against women is not only accepted, but ultimately their fault. Secondly, by intruding on Max’s intimate autoerotic act, Tarttelin turns a tender moment into a toxic one, echoing this way the sex-negative views of a society that does not understand nor accept sexual difference. Tarttelin also explores the panics of internalized homophobia and its dangers. When Max initially rejects Hunter’s advances by claiming that he is not gay, Hunter contends that he is not gay either—that he does not like boys or girls, he just likes Max. For a brief moment, Tarttelin achieves something that is incredibly difficult: she gets the reader to sympathize with the perpetrator by depicting him as a scared teenager who is running away from a social identity he does not want. For Hunter, Max’s non-binary embodiment means that he does not have to be gay because Max is not entirely male, and this means that he can like, and even love him, without having to suffer the negative consequences of homosexual attraction. It is by implicitly criticizing social stigma that Tarttelin brilliantly launches a forceful attack against the impenetrable fortress of normativity. Even though Tarttelin addresses a vast array of important social issues, Golden Boy is ultimately a novel about secrets and their consequences. The entire narrative centers around the domino effect caused by ignorance and silence. Tarttelin portrays Max’s parents as loving and caring, but their refusal to engage the subject of intersex ultimately leads Max to grow up knowing very little about the capabilities of his body. His parents’ negations, particularly his mother’s, lead Max to grow up thinking that intersexuality was shameful—which in the end gave Hunter, who knew of Max’s intersex “condition,” enough power to subjugate him. This, in turn, estranged Max from what had once been his support system, forcing him to deal with his trauma alone. Because Max’s parents were so adamant about not speaking about Max’s intersexuality, the medical talk is limited to what Max is allowed to hear. Tarttelin does eventually explain Max’s intersex variation—46,XX/46,XY, or what is known today as chimeric or ovotesticular intersexuality— through the character of Archie, a kind-hearted doctor who seems to be the only one who has Max’s best interest in mind. In essence, it is this particular intersex embodiment that allows for the","PeriodicalId":75665,"journal":{"name":"California nurse","volume":"90 5 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"76","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"California nurse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvh9vv49.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 76

Abstract

Abigail Tarttelin’s heartbreaking coming-ofage novel, Golden Boy, addresses the complexities of identity development and its intersection with sexual violence. In her crusade to fill in the blanks of a fragmented life, Tartellin uses a multipleperspective narrative style to help the reader make sense of Max Walker, the beautiful boy whose entire life has been shaped by secrets. Told from the perspective of Max himself, his parents, his little brother, his new doctor, and the girl he ultimately ends up falling in love with, Golden Boy is a twofold tale about the often unspoken realities of intersexuality and rape. Tarttelin is an assertive storyteller who ensnares the reader in a web of emotions without much warning. In fact, the reader is suddenly plunged into a whirlwind of vivid imagery that perfectly captures the pain of a fracturing adolescence. Rape is a heinous crime against the body, and Tarttelin makes sure to evoke that by depicting Max’s rape as particularly savage: he was assaulted by Hunter, his best friend from childhood, after Hunter caught him masturbating. This in itself was particularly destabilizing for Max because, as a boy, he had been caught stimulating the part of his genitalia that more closely resembled a vagina—something he seldom did—and would now be potentially off-limits. In a horrific, yet not surprising manner, Hunter then utilizes Max’s previous actions to justify his own by telling Max that he is “more girl than boy,” and hence, “you are supposed to like me.” By framing the rape in this way, Tarttelin explores several tropes of heteronormative power. Firstly, she feminizes Max by exposing his most fragile vulnerability—his sex—and turns Hunter into the predatory male who uses Max’s biggest secret as a weapon to control and silence him, thereby reinforcing the ideology that violence against women is not only accepted, but ultimately their fault. Secondly, by intruding on Max’s intimate autoerotic act, Tarttelin turns a tender moment into a toxic one, echoing this way the sex-negative views of a society that does not understand nor accept sexual difference. Tarttelin also explores the panics of internalized homophobia and its dangers. When Max initially rejects Hunter’s advances by claiming that he is not gay, Hunter contends that he is not gay either—that he does not like boys or girls, he just likes Max. For a brief moment, Tarttelin achieves something that is incredibly difficult: she gets the reader to sympathize with the perpetrator by depicting him as a scared teenager who is running away from a social identity he does not want. For Hunter, Max’s non-binary embodiment means that he does not have to be gay because Max is not entirely male, and this means that he can like, and even love him, without having to suffer the negative consequences of homosexual attraction. It is by implicitly criticizing social stigma that Tarttelin brilliantly launches a forceful attack against the impenetrable fortress of normativity. Even though Tarttelin addresses a vast array of important social issues, Golden Boy is ultimately a novel about secrets and their consequences. The entire narrative centers around the domino effect caused by ignorance and silence. Tarttelin portrays Max’s parents as loving and caring, but their refusal to engage the subject of intersex ultimately leads Max to grow up knowing very little about the capabilities of his body. His parents’ negations, particularly his mother’s, lead Max to grow up thinking that intersexuality was shameful—which in the end gave Hunter, who knew of Max’s intersex “condition,” enough power to subjugate him. This, in turn, estranged Max from what had once been his support system, forcing him to deal with his trauma alone. Because Max’s parents were so adamant about not speaking about Max’s intersexuality, the medical talk is limited to what Max is allowed to hear. Tarttelin does eventually explain Max’s intersex variation—46,XX/46,XY, or what is known today as chimeric or ovotesticular intersexuality— through the character of Archie, a kind-hearted doctor who seems to be the only one who has Max’s best interest in mind. In essence, it is this particular intersex embodiment that allows for the
秘密。
阿比盖尔·塔特林令人心碎的成人小说《金童》讲述了身份发展的复杂性及其与性暴力的交叉。在她为填补支离破碎的生活空白而进行的斗争中,Tartellin使用了多视角的叙事风格来帮助读者理解Max Walker,这个美丽的男孩的整个生活都被秘密所塑造。《金童》从马克斯本人、父母、弟弟、新医生以及他最终爱上的女孩的角度讲述,讲述了一个关于双性恋和强奸的双重现实。塔特林是一个自信的故事讲述者,他在没有太多警告的情况下将读者困在情感的网络中。事实上,读者突然陷入了一股生动形象的旋风中,完美地捕捉到了青春期破裂的痛苦。强奸是一种对身体的令人发指的罪行,塔特林将马克斯的强奸描述为特别野蛮,以此来唤起这一点:在亨特发现他手淫后,他遭到了他儿时最好的朋友亨特的袭击。这本身对Max来说尤其不稳定,因为小时候,他曾被发现刺激生殖器中更像阴道的部分——这是他很少做的事情——现在可能是禁止的。亨特以一种可怕但并不令人惊讶的方式,利用马克斯之前的行为来为自己辩护,告诉马克斯他“更像女孩而不是男孩”,因此,“你应该喜欢我。”通过这种方式描述强奸,塔特林探索了几种非规范权力的比喻。首先,她通过揭露马克斯最脆弱的脆弱性——他的性别——使他女性化,并将亨特变成一个掠夺性的男性,他利用马克斯最大的秘密作为武器来控制和压制他,从而强化了这样一种意识形态,即对女性的暴力不仅被接受,而且最终是她们的错。其次,通过侵入马克斯的亲密自我性爱行为,塔特林将一个温柔的时刻变成了一个有毒的时刻,以这种方式呼应了一个不理解也不接受性别差异的社会的性别负面观点。塔特林还探讨了内在的恐同心理的恐慌及其危险。当Max最初拒绝亨特的示好,声称自己不是同性恋时,亨特辩称自己也不是同性恋——他不喜欢男孩或女孩,他只是喜欢Max,塔特林完成了一件非常困难的事情:她把施暴者描绘成一个害怕的青少年,逃离他不想要的社会身份,从而让读者同情他。对亨特来说,马克斯的非二元化身意味着他不必是同性恋,因为马克斯并不完全是男性,这意味着他可以喜欢甚至爱他,而不必承受同性恋吸引力的负面后果。正是通过含蓄地批评社会污名,塔特林出色地对这座坚不可摧的规范堡垒发起了强有力的攻击。尽管塔特林涉及一系列重要的社会问题,但《金童》最终还是一部关于秘密及其后果的小说。整个故事围绕着无知和沉默造成的多米诺骨牌效应展开。塔特林将马克斯的父母描绘成充满爱和关怀的人,但他们拒绝参与双性人的话题,最终导致马克斯在成长过程中对自己身体的能力知之甚少。父母的否定,尤其是母亲的否定,让马克斯在成长过程中认为双性恋是可耻的——这最终给了亨特足够的权力来征服他,亨特知道马克斯的双性恋“状况”。这反过来又使马克斯与曾经的支持系统疏远,迫使他独自处理自己的创伤。因为Max的父母非常坚决地不谈论Max的双性恋,所以医学上的谈话仅限于Max可以听到的内容。塔特林最终通过阿奇这个善良的医生的角色解释了马克斯的双性变异——46,XX/46,XY,或者今天所说的嵌合或卵睾丸双性性——他似乎是唯一一个对马克斯最感兴趣的人。本质上,正是这种特定的双性人实施例允许
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信