Institutional Dilemma: Quad and ASEAN in the Indo-Pacific

IF 1.3 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Asian Perspective Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1353/apr.2023.0001

K. Koga

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:How is the future of the Indo-Pacific institutional arrangements envisioned by the Quad and ASEAN? Are they mutually exclusive or compatible? How can the institutional competition between the Quad and ASEAN in the Indo-Pacific be avoided? I argue that the institutional competition between the Quad and ASEAN can be provisionally alleviated through strategic ambiguities about the institutional division of labor in the Indo-Pacific. However, such strategic ambiguities do not resolve normative inconsistencies between the Quad and ASEAN, which would probably trigger institutional competition in the future. To resolve such difficulties, both the Quad and ASEAN need to create a mechanism that clarifies their regional institutional division of labor.

查看原文本刊更多论文

制度困境：印度-太平洋地区的四方与东盟

摘要：四方和东盟对印太体制安排的未来设想如何？它们是相互排斥的还是兼容的？如何避免四方与东盟在印太地区的制度竞争？我认为，四方与东盟之间的制度竞争可以通过印太地区制度分工的战略模糊性暂时缓解。然而，这种战略模糊性并不能解决四方会谈和东盟之间的规范不一致问题，这可能会在未来引发制度竞争。为了解决这些困难，四方会谈和东盟都需要建立一个机制，明确其区域制度分工。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Asian Perspective INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： ASIAN PERSPECTIVE is the peer-reviewed social sciences journal of world/comparative politics of the Institute for Far Eastern Studies, Kyungnam University. Published quarterly, Asian Perspective has devoted its pages to critical analysis of the global, regional, and transnational issues affecting Northeast Asia for over 25 years. Bringing cogent, thought-provoking examination of the significant developments in Asia and the world as they unfold to the scrutiny of its readership, Asian Perspective continues to promote a healthy exchange of ideas among scholars, students, and policymakers.