Extending Urban Development on Water: Jakarta Case Study

IF 1.3 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
R. Setiadi, J. Baumeister, P. Burton, J. Nalau
{"title":"Extending Urban Development on Water: Jakarta Case Study","authors":"R. Setiadi, J. Baumeister, P. Burton, J. Nalau","doi":"10.1177/0975425320938539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article introduces the concept of ‘Sea Cities’ to emphasize a range of tactics to acknowledge the relationship between the sea and cities. This concept is critical for the possibility of integrating future aquatic-based urbanism to address climate change, and in particular, the issue of rising sea levels, which is currently faced by the majority of coastal cities. We compare and assess the tactics of four sea cities (i.e., to fortify, accommodate, release, and floating) against the case study of Jakarta. Jakarta is deemed to be among the metropolitan cities most vulnerable to sea level rise, owing to overpopulation alongside the fact that its land is sinking rapidly due to massive urban development. In order to understand the prospects and pitfalls of each tactic for Jakarta, we analyse scholarly literature on the subject, official government reports and documents, as well as policy briefs released by governments at the national level. This study finds that massive hard structural solutions are not only insufficient but also ineffective towards solving the challenges of climate change in Jakarta, especially the rising sea level. At the same time, it also identifies that while the combination of accommodating and floating tactics has never been considered as future a planning option, this could enable more resilient and adaptive solutions for the future development trajectory of Jakarta. In doing so, it could also provide important transferrable lessons for other coastal cities, especially those within developing countries.","PeriodicalId":44690,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Urbanization ASIA","volume":"11 1","pages":"247 - 265"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0975425320938539","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Urbanization ASIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0975425320938539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article introduces the concept of ‘Sea Cities’ to emphasize a range of tactics to acknowledge the relationship between the sea and cities. This concept is critical for the possibility of integrating future aquatic-based urbanism to address climate change, and in particular, the issue of rising sea levels, which is currently faced by the majority of coastal cities. We compare and assess the tactics of four sea cities (i.e., to fortify, accommodate, release, and floating) against the case study of Jakarta. Jakarta is deemed to be among the metropolitan cities most vulnerable to sea level rise, owing to overpopulation alongside the fact that its land is sinking rapidly due to massive urban development. In order to understand the prospects and pitfalls of each tactic for Jakarta, we analyse scholarly literature on the subject, official government reports and documents, as well as policy briefs released by governments at the national level. This study finds that massive hard structural solutions are not only insufficient but also ineffective towards solving the challenges of climate change in Jakarta, especially the rising sea level. At the same time, it also identifies that while the combination of accommodating and floating tactics has never been considered as future a planning option, this could enable more resilient and adaptive solutions for the future development trajectory of Jakarta. In doing so, it could also provide important transferrable lessons for other coastal cities, especially those within developing countries.
以水为基础扩展城市发展:雅加达案例研究
本文介绍了“海洋城市”的概念,强调了一系列认识海洋与城市关系的策略。这一概念对于整合未来以水生为基础的城市主义以应对气候变化,特别是大多数沿海城市目前面临的海平面上升问题的可能性至关重要。我们以雅加达为例,对四个海上城市的策略(即设防、容纳、释放和漂浮)进行了比较和评估。雅加达被认为是最容易受到海平面上升影响的大城市之一,因为人口过剩,而且由于大规模的城市发展,它的土地正在迅速下沉。为了了解雅加达每一种策略的前景和陷阱,我们分析了有关该主题的学术文献、官方政府报告和文件,以及各国政府在国家层面发布的政策简报。本研究发现,大规模的硬结构解决方案不仅不足,而且对解决雅加达气候变化的挑战,特别是海平面上升的挑战无效。与此同时,它也表明,虽然通融和浮动策略的结合从未被视为未来的规划选择,但这可以为雅加达未来的发展轨迹提供更具弹性和适应性的解决方案。在这样做的过程中,它也可以为其他沿海城市,特别是发展中国家的沿海城市提供重要的可转移的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environment and Urbanization ASIA
Environment and Urbanization ASIA ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信