Has Mars become the new space Race? And are we able to justify space Exploration?

Q1 Physics and Astronomy
REACH Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.reach.2022.100049
Jay Bains
{"title":"Has Mars become the new space Race? And are we able to justify space Exploration?","authors":"Jay Bains","doi":"10.1016/j.reach.2022.100049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Space exploration is embedded into the foundation of our past, exists at the forefront of the present and is inevitable in our society’s future. We, as a species, first set our sights on the closest celestial body<span>, the Moon<span>. Since then, society’s ambitions have extended far beyond the confines of the Moon, with the Martian surface becoming an extra-terrestrial target location for space exploration, data collection and potential colonization. History is known to repeat itself, whilst this common saying is often overlooked, its application is rather fitting when the details of this instance are examined. We, as an internationally divided species, have entered into a contemporary space race. In direct comparison to ascendant events of the Cold War, this modern contest is more attributed to an expression of technological prowess rather than a show of the superior ideology. Mars colonization would irrefutably be the crowning achievement of the century thus far. But beyond the technical intricacy of the task, the attributes and implications of becoming a multi-planetary species provide compelling rationales that argue in favour for crewed interplanetary exploration. With the prospect of advances in astronautical engineering, medicine and robotics, both the United States and China have become prominent figureheads of this contemporary space race to Mars. However, in pursuit of becoming the pioneering claimant of technological superiority, these two nations have perhaps overlooked the pre-existing issues that perpetually plague society. Many societal imperfections that exist are decipherable; including poverty, overpopulation and climate change. This list is not easily exhaustible, but a concentrated focus of inputs (namely capital, labour, natural resources and time) could lead to a more idealistic society. The overarching implications of the opportunity costs associated with space exploration are visualized by these issues. Thus, by dissecting the components of Mars exploration, this report seeks to evaluate the significance of the space industry and to ultimately evaluate how we, as a collective, should look to develop our civilisation going into the future.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":37501,"journal":{"name":"REACH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REACH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352309322000037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Space exploration is embedded into the foundation of our past, exists at the forefront of the present and is inevitable in our society’s future. We, as a species, first set our sights on the closest celestial body, the Moon. Since then, society’s ambitions have extended far beyond the confines of the Moon, with the Martian surface becoming an extra-terrestrial target location for space exploration, data collection and potential colonization. History is known to repeat itself, whilst this common saying is often overlooked, its application is rather fitting when the details of this instance are examined. We, as an internationally divided species, have entered into a contemporary space race. In direct comparison to ascendant events of the Cold War, this modern contest is more attributed to an expression of technological prowess rather than a show of the superior ideology. Mars colonization would irrefutably be the crowning achievement of the century thus far. But beyond the technical intricacy of the task, the attributes and implications of becoming a multi-planetary species provide compelling rationales that argue in favour for crewed interplanetary exploration. With the prospect of advances in astronautical engineering, medicine and robotics, both the United States and China have become prominent figureheads of this contemporary space race to Mars. However, in pursuit of becoming the pioneering claimant of technological superiority, these two nations have perhaps overlooked the pre-existing issues that perpetually plague society. Many societal imperfections that exist are decipherable; including poverty, overpopulation and climate change. This list is not easily exhaustible, but a concentrated focus of inputs (namely capital, labour, natural resources and time) could lead to a more idealistic society. The overarching implications of the opportunity costs associated with space exploration are visualized by these issues. Thus, by dissecting the components of Mars exploration, this report seeks to evaluate the significance of the space industry and to ultimately evaluate how we, as a collective, should look to develop our civilisation going into the future.

火星已经成为新的太空竞赛吗?我们能证明太空探索的合理性吗?
太空探索根植于我们过去的基础,存在于现在的前沿,是我们社会未来不可避免的一部分。作为一个物种,我们首先把目光投向了离我们最近的天体——月球。从那时起,人类社会的野心已经远远超出了月球的范围,火星表面成为了太空探索、数据收集和潜在殖民的地外目标地点。众所周知,历史是会重复的,虽然这句俗语经常被忽视,但当我们仔细研究这个例子的细节时,它的应用是相当合适的。作为一个在国际上划分的物种,我们已经进入了一场当代太空竞赛。与冷战时期兴起的事件直接相比,这场现代竞赛更多地归因于对技术实力的展示,而不是对优越意识形态的展示。火星殖民无疑将是本世纪迄今为止最伟大的成就。但是,除了这项任务的技术复杂性之外,成为一个多行星物种的属性和含义为支持载人星际探索提供了令人信服的理由。随着航天工程、医学和机器人技术的进步,美国和中国都已成为当代火星太空竞赛的领军人物。然而,在追求成为技术优势的先锋者的过程中,这两个国家可能忽视了长期困扰社会的预先存在的问题。许多存在的社会缺陷是可以解读的;包括贫困、人口过剩和气候变化。这个清单不容易用尽,但集中关注投入(即资本、劳动力、自然资源和时间)可能会导致一个更理想主义的社会。与空间探索相关的机会成本的总体影响通过这些问题可见。因此,通过剖析火星探索的组成部分,本报告试图评估太空工业的重要性,并最终评估我们作为一个集体,应该如何展望未来,发展我们的文明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
REACH
REACH Engineering-Aerospace Engineering
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: The Official Human Space Exploration Review Journal of the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) and the International Astronautical Federation (IAF) REACH – Reviews in Human Space Exploration is an international review journal that covers the entire field of human space exploration, including: -Human Space Exploration Mission Scenarios -Robotic Space Exploration Missions (Preparing or Supporting Human Missions) -Commercial Human Spaceflight -Space Habitation and Environmental Health -Space Physiology, Psychology, Medicine and Environmental Health -Space Radiation and Radiation Biology -Exo- and Astrobiology -Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) -Spin-off Applications from Human Spaceflight -Benefits from Space-Based Research for Health on Earth -Earth Observation for Agriculture, Climate Monitoring, Disaster Mitigation -Terrestrial Applications of Space Life Sciences Developments -Extreme Environments REACH aims to meet the needs of readers from academia, industry, and government by publishing comprehensive overviews of the science of human and robotic space exploration, life sciences research in space, and beneficial terrestrial applications that are derived from spaceflight. Special emphasis will be put on summarizing the most important recent developments and challenges in each of the covered fields, and on making published articles legible for a non-specialist audience. Authors can also submit non-solicited review articles. Please note that original research articles are not published in REACH. The Journal plans to publish four issues per year containing six to eight review articles each.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信