"Caine's Stake": Aimé Césaire, Emmett Till, and the Work of Acknowledgment

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
C. McCall
{"title":"\"Caine's Stake\": Aimé Césaire, Emmett Till, and the Work of Acknowledgment","authors":"C. McCall","doi":"10.5195/jffp.2020.941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our reasons for avoiding death are manifold, encompassing among others, motives that are personal, political, and historical. Still, are there ways that we might use words to overcome these common everyday aversions to death and the dead through another modality of language, that of poetry for example? Can the poetic word get us to acknowledge the particulars of death despite the various reasons we have to disavow it? Might we use language not simply grasp death abstractly (or more accurately, fail to grasp it) but instead to realize what death means in its awful particularity? These questions are prompted by Aime Cesaire’s poerty and his prose, and by his elegy for Emmett Till in particular. Through his writings and his political work, one of Cesaire’s key aims was to get people to acknowledge what they would prefer to avoid.  Cesaire’s work, both his poetry and prose, urges readers to see the things they would prefer not to see and to show us how language stakes us to the world in all its terrifying awfulness and wondrous splendor, despite our desperate attempts to avoid this realization. This essay is divided into two parts. The first part looks at how this problem of alienation and the need to acknowle this alienation motivates Cesaire’s writing more generally, focusing on the ten years between 1945 (when his essay “Poetry and Knowledge” is published) and 1955 (when the second edition of his Discourse on Colonialism is published) . In order to consider how alienation and acknowledgement work in this celebrated text, I consider related works and their contexts from the period from 1950-1956, including his famous letter of resignation from the French Communist Party. This sets the stage for the reading of Cesaire’s Ferraments provided in the second section. The second part examines how and why Cesaire sought acknowledgement for Emmett Till’s brutal murder through his poetry, focusing specifically on his poem “…On the State of the Union” from his 1960 collection Ferraments.","PeriodicalId":41846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/jffp.2020.941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our reasons for avoiding death are manifold, encompassing among others, motives that are personal, political, and historical. Still, are there ways that we might use words to overcome these common everyday aversions to death and the dead through another modality of language, that of poetry for example? Can the poetic word get us to acknowledge the particulars of death despite the various reasons we have to disavow it? Might we use language not simply grasp death abstractly (or more accurately, fail to grasp it) but instead to realize what death means in its awful particularity? These questions are prompted by Aime Cesaire’s poerty and his prose, and by his elegy for Emmett Till in particular. Through his writings and his political work, one of Cesaire’s key aims was to get people to acknowledge what they would prefer to avoid.  Cesaire’s work, both his poetry and prose, urges readers to see the things they would prefer not to see and to show us how language stakes us to the world in all its terrifying awfulness and wondrous splendor, despite our desperate attempts to avoid this realization. This essay is divided into two parts. The first part looks at how this problem of alienation and the need to acknowle this alienation motivates Cesaire’s writing more generally, focusing on the ten years between 1945 (when his essay “Poetry and Knowledge” is published) and 1955 (when the second edition of his Discourse on Colonialism is published) . In order to consider how alienation and acknowledgement work in this celebrated text, I consider related works and their contexts from the period from 1950-1956, including his famous letter of resignation from the French Communist Party. This sets the stage for the reading of Cesaire’s Ferraments provided in the second section. The second part examines how and why Cesaire sought acknowledgement for Emmett Till’s brutal murder through his poetry, focusing specifically on his poem “…On the State of the Union” from his 1960 collection Ferraments.
《凯恩的赌注》:艾梅·塞泽尔、埃米特·蒂尔和致谢作品
我们避免死亡的原因是多方面的,其中包括个人动机、政治动机和历史动机。然而,我们是否有办法通过语言的另一种形式,比如诗歌,来克服日常生活中对死亡和死者的厌恶?尽管我们有各种理由否认死亡,但诗歌能让我们承认死亡的细节吗?我们是否可以使用语言,而不是简单地抽象地理解死亡(或者更准确地说,无法理解死亡),而是认识到死亡在其可怕的特殊性中意味着什么?这些问题是由艾梅·塞塞尔的贫穷和他的散文,尤其是他为埃米特·蒂尔写的挽歌所引发的。通过他的著作和政治工作,塞塞尔的主要目标之一是让人们承认他们宁愿避免的事情。塞塞尔的作品,无论是诗歌还是散文,都敦促读者看到他们不愿看到的东西,并向我们展示语言是如何将我们与世界联系在一起的,尽管我们不顾一切地试图避免这一点。本文分为两部分。第一部分探讨了异化的问题以及承认这种异化的必要性是如何促使塞塞尔更广泛地写作的,重点关注1945年(他的论文《诗歌与知识》出版)到1955年(他的《论殖民主义》第二版出版)之间的十年。为了考虑异化和承认是如何在这个著名的文本中起作用的,我考虑了1950-1956年期间的相关作品及其背景,包括他著名的法国共产党的辞职信。这为第二部分提供的阅读塞塞尔的《发酵》奠定了基础。第二部分考察了塞塞尔如何以及为什么通过他的诗歌为埃米特·蒂尔的残忍谋杀寻求承认,特别关注他在1960年的诗集《Ferraments》中的诗“……国情咨文”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信