Diagnosis of fibromyalgia: diagnostic feasibility and accuracy of thermography

Claudia Kumpel, Anselmo Cordeiro de Souza, J. Ribeiro, Hildemar Minoru Shirata, Júlia de Oliveira, Cesário Bianchi Filho
{"title":"Diagnosis of fibromyalgia: diagnostic feasibility and accuracy of thermography","authors":"Claudia Kumpel, Anselmo Cordeiro de Souza, J. Ribeiro, Hildemar Minoru Shirata, Júlia de Oliveira, Cesário Bianchi Filho","doi":"10.7322/abcshs.2021113.2146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Studies have suggested using thermography as a resource to diagnose fibromyalgia, although there has been no evidence confirming this hypothesis so far. Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of computerized infrared thermography as an auxiliary method for diagnosing fibromyalgia. Methods: It is a diagnostic accuracy studywith cross-sectional design. One hundred and three individuals were evaluated for global pain using the Visual Analogue Scale. The measurement of pain at tender points was assessed by algometry, and skin temperature was assessed by thermography. To evaluate sensitivity and specificity, the analysis was performed using the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, measured by the area under the curve with their respective confidence intervals. Results: Thermography has not been very sensitive or specific for pain (tender points) and diagnosis of fibromyalgia, according to the evaluation of the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, with an area under the curve equal to or lower than 0.75. Conclusion: In this study the thermography was not sensitive and specific as a tool for diagnosing the fibromyalgia syndrome. This study highlights important clinical implications concerning the current methods for diagnosing it, which, despite all efforts, are still subjective and poorly reproducible.","PeriodicalId":30632,"journal":{"name":"ABCS Health Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABCS Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7322/abcshs.2021113.2146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Studies have suggested using thermography as a resource to diagnose fibromyalgia, although there has been no evidence confirming this hypothesis so far. Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of computerized infrared thermography as an auxiliary method for diagnosing fibromyalgia. Methods: It is a diagnostic accuracy studywith cross-sectional design. One hundred and three individuals were evaluated for global pain using the Visual Analogue Scale. The measurement of pain at tender points was assessed by algometry, and skin temperature was assessed by thermography. To evaluate sensitivity and specificity, the analysis was performed using the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, measured by the area under the curve with their respective confidence intervals. Results: Thermography has not been very sensitive or specific for pain (tender points) and diagnosis of fibromyalgia, according to the evaluation of the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, with an area under the curve equal to or lower than 0.75. Conclusion: In this study the thermography was not sensitive and specific as a tool for diagnosing the fibromyalgia syndrome. This study highlights important clinical implications concerning the current methods for diagnosing it, which, despite all efforts, are still subjective and poorly reproducible.
纤维肌痛的诊断:热成像诊断的可行性和准确性
研究建议使用热成像作为诊断纤维肌痛的一种资源,尽管到目前为止还没有证据证实这一假设。目的:评价计算机红外热像仪辅助诊断纤维肌痛的敏感性和特异性。方法:采用横断面设计进行诊断准确性研究。使用视觉模拟量表对103人的全身疼痛进行了评估。痛点疼痛测量采用测痛法,皮肤温度测量采用热像仪。为了评估敏感性和特异性,使用受试者工作特征曲线进行分析,通过曲线下的面积和各自的置信区间来测量。结果:热成像对疼痛(压痛点)和纤维肌痛的诊断没有很好的敏感性和特异性,根据接受者工作特征曲线的评价,曲线下面积等于或小于0.75。结论:在本研究中,热成像作为诊断纤维肌痛综合征的工具缺乏敏感性和特异性。这项研究强调了当前诊断方法的重要临床意义,尽管所有的努力,仍然是主观的,可重复性差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信