Effect of DCRP and DCSP Polarity on SMAW Welding on the Depth of Penetration with E7018 Electrodes using Low Carbon Steel ASTM A36

M. Hidayat, Helleni Febnesia, S. Ramdani
{"title":"Effect of DCRP and DCSP Polarity on SMAW Welding on the Depth of Penetration with E7018 Electrodes using Low Carbon Steel ASTM A36","authors":"M. Hidayat, Helleni Febnesia, S. Ramdani","doi":"10.17977/um016v5i12021p037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to determine the level of penetration depth using SMAW (Shielded Metal Arc Welding) Process based on the polarity type of DCRP (Direct Current Reverse Polarity) and DCSP (Direct Current Straight Polarity). This research used ASTM A36 low carbon steel plate with thickness of 6 mm and length of 200 mm, Electrode E7018 LB-52-18 ∅ 3.2 mm, and with current parameters of 90 A, 100 A, 110 A, 120 A and 130 A and 70° welding arc angle. The method used the experimental research. Data collection techniques applied direct observation techniques and descriptive statistical data analysis techniques. Testing the penetration depth of the welds with a macrographic test was conducted by an optical microscope. The test results show that DCRP has more depth than DCSP when the current is 90 A with a difference of 0.38 mm. When the current is 100 A, DCRP is deeper with a difference of 0.312 mm compared to DCSP. The third experiment, with a current of 110 A DCRP, was deeper with a difference of 0.05 mm compared to DCSP. During the fourth and fifth experiments, DCRP was deeper with a difference of 0.21 mm compared to DCSP at 120 A and DCRP was 0.324 mm deeper than DCSP at 130 A. It can be concluded that the effect of DCRP and DCSP polarity on the depth of penetration using E7018 electrodes and ASTM low carbon steel A36, DCRP polarity has a deeper penetration depth compared to DCSP.","PeriodicalId":16315,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science and Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17977/um016v5i12021p037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aims to determine the level of penetration depth using SMAW (Shielded Metal Arc Welding) Process based on the polarity type of DCRP (Direct Current Reverse Polarity) and DCSP (Direct Current Straight Polarity). This research used ASTM A36 low carbon steel plate with thickness of 6 mm and length of 200 mm, Electrode E7018 LB-52-18 ∅ 3.2 mm, and with current parameters of 90 A, 100 A, 110 A, 120 A and 130 A and 70° welding arc angle. The method used the experimental research. Data collection techniques applied direct observation techniques and descriptive statistical data analysis techniques. Testing the penetration depth of the welds with a macrographic test was conducted by an optical microscope. The test results show that DCRP has more depth than DCSP when the current is 90 A with a difference of 0.38 mm. When the current is 100 A, DCRP is deeper with a difference of 0.312 mm compared to DCSP. The third experiment, with a current of 110 A DCRP, was deeper with a difference of 0.05 mm compared to DCSP. During the fourth and fifth experiments, DCRP was deeper with a difference of 0.21 mm compared to DCSP at 120 A and DCRP was 0.324 mm deeper than DCSP at 130 A. It can be concluded that the effect of DCRP and DCSP polarity on the depth of penetration using E7018 electrodes and ASTM low carbon steel A36, DCRP polarity has a deeper penetration depth compared to DCSP.
DCRP和DCSP极性对低碳钢ASTM A36 E7018焊条SMAW焊透深度的影响
本研究旨在根据DCRP(直流反极性)和DCSP(直流直极性)的极性类型,确定SMAW(屏蔽金属电弧焊)工艺的熔深水平。本研究采用ASTM A36低碳钢板,厚度6mm,长度200mm,焊条E7018 LB-52-18∅3.2mm,电流参数为90A、100A、110A、120A和130A,焊接弧角为70°。该方法采用了实验研究的方法。数据收集技术采用了直接观察技术和描述性统计数据分析技术。通过光学显微镜进行宏观测试,测试焊缝的穿透深度。测试结果表明,当电流为90A时,DCRP比DCSP具有更大的深度,差异为0.38mm。当电流为100A时,与DCSP相比,DCRP更深,差异为0.312mm。第三个实验的电流为110A DCRP,与DCSP相比,深度更深,差异为0.05mm。在第四次和第五次实验中,在120A时,DCRP比DCSP更深,差异为0.21mm,在130A时,DCPP比DCSP深0.324mm。可以得出结论,使用E7018电极和ASTM低碳钢A36,DCRP和DCSP极性对穿透深度的影响,DCRP极性比DCSP具有更深的穿透深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信