E le sauaina tatou tagata matutua: Re-examining abuse through cultural lens of the fonofale model

Juliet Boon-Nanai, S. Thaggard, E. Tautolo
{"title":"E le sauaina tatou tagata matutua: Re-examining abuse through cultural lens of the fonofale model","authors":"Juliet Boon-Nanai, S. Thaggard, E. Tautolo","doi":"10.26635/phd.2021.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Cultural paradigms are emerging as the appropriate way to examine Samoans’ life experiences. In this study, it proposes to employ the fonofale model to explore and examine the notion of abuse among Pacific elders main from a Samoan lens. \nMethodology In framing this study, the talanoa approach was deemed culturally appropriate. Twelve Samoan tagata matutua (elderly people) were asked to talanoa (discuss) their experiences of what abuse means to them. \nFindings suggest that, initially, abuse of Samoan elders was at first contested. That it is not the fa’asamoa(Samoan way). However, as the talanoa gathered mafana (warmth) and malie (maintained good social relationships), most agreed that physical abuse was uncommon within an aiga (familial) context, but other forms of abuse were apparent. \nConclusion For these tagata matutua, six different forms of abuse were identified; with particular emphasis on cultural and spiritual abuse. Following the fonofale paradigm, which reflects the Samoan worldview, this article informs the perception of spiritual abuse for Samoan elders and is relevant within the wider Pacific context.","PeriodicalId":82251,"journal":{"name":"Pacific health dialog","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific health dialog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/phd.2021.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction Cultural paradigms are emerging as the appropriate way to examine Samoans’ life experiences. In this study, it proposes to employ the fonofale model to explore and examine the notion of abuse among Pacific elders main from a Samoan lens. Methodology In framing this study, the talanoa approach was deemed culturally appropriate. Twelve Samoan tagata matutua (elderly people) were asked to talanoa (discuss) their experiences of what abuse means to them. Findings suggest that, initially, abuse of Samoan elders was at first contested. That it is not the fa’asamoa(Samoan way). However, as the talanoa gathered mafana (warmth) and malie (maintained good social relationships), most agreed that physical abuse was uncommon within an aiga (familial) context, but other forms of abuse were apparent. Conclusion For these tagata matutua, six different forms of abuse were identified; with particular emphasis on cultural and spiritual abuse. Following the fonofale paradigm, which reflects the Samoan worldview, this article informs the perception of spiritual abuse for Samoan elders and is relevant within the wider Pacific context.
从性别模式的文化视角重新审视虐待行为
引言文化范式正在成为审视萨摩亚人生活经历的合适方式。在这项研究中,它建议采用foofale模型,主要从萨摩亚人的角度来探索和检验太平洋老年人虐待的概念。方法在制定本研究框架时,塔拉纳方法被认为在文化上是合适的。12名萨摩亚人(老年人)被要求到塔拉诺阿(讨论)他们遭受虐待的经历。调查结果表明,起初,对萨摩亚老年人的虐待是有争议的。这不是萨摩亚的方式。然而,随着塔拉诺亚人聚集了mafana(温暖)和malie(保持良好的社会关系),大多数人都认为,在aiga(家庭)背景下,身体虐待并不常见,但其他形式的虐待也很明显。结论对于这些田田,发现了六种不同形式的虐待行为;特别强调文化和精神虐待。根据反映萨摩亚世界观的foofale范式,本文揭示了萨摩亚老年人对精神虐待的看法,并在更广泛的太平洋背景下具有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信