Impact of Maternity Benefits Act, 1961 [Amendment 2017] on job employment of working mothers in India

IF 1.3 Q1 LAW
Rajshree Karbhari Gethe, Ashish Pandey
{"title":"Impact of Maternity Benefits Act, 1961 [Amendment 2017] on job employment of working mothers in India","authors":"Rajshree Karbhari Gethe, Ashish Pandey","doi":"10.1108/ijlma-06-2022-0129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to clarify an impact of Maternity Benefits Act, 1961 (Amendment 2017) on job employment of working mothers. It proposes the certain facts that has positive impact on employment of women from the point of view of Government of India, but at the same time it highlights some negative implications that are faced by the employers and working mothers. The objective of this act is to provide a woman with a financial assistance and make her free from engaging in any work so as to protect health of “New Mother” and “New Born child”. Also, the act ensures women to take care of her child without having worry about loss of her job and loss of her employment.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper carries efforts of researcher done on the topic of “Impact of Maternity Benefits Act, 1961 (Amendment 2017)” and measures its impact on employers and job employment of working mothers in India through literature review from various sources like SCOPUS, EMERALD, EBSCO, PROQUEST, SAGE, etc. The paper opted for an exploratory study using the questionnaire approach of grounded theory, including 50 in-depth interviews of working mothers.\n\n\nFindings\nOutcome of this describes both positive and negative implications of this amendment on businesses and job employment of working mothers. It throws the limelight on implementation of this act in real life and identification of problems and stress faced by women employee either to get the job or to retain the job during pregnancy period which is very hazardous to the health of women and her inborn child also.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nBecause of the chosen research approach, the research results may lack generalizability. Therefore, researchers are encouraged to test the proposed propositions further.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe paper includes implications of the Maternity Benefits Act, 1961 (Amendment 2017) on employers whether to hire women employee or not and on women though they are having capability to do work but because of ignorance of government on ensuring proper implementation of act, women are not getting opportunity to work after baby birth.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper fulfils an identified need to study and find some measures for effective implantation of Maternity Benefits Act, 1961 (Amendment 2017) so as to protect and regulate employment of women workers before and after child birth so as to increase female labour force participation rate.\n","PeriodicalId":46125,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-06-2022-0129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to clarify an impact of Maternity Benefits Act, 1961 (Amendment 2017) on job employment of working mothers. It proposes the certain facts that has positive impact on employment of women from the point of view of Government of India, but at the same time it highlights some negative implications that are faced by the employers and working mothers. The objective of this act is to provide a woman with a financial assistance and make her free from engaging in any work so as to protect health of “New Mother” and “New Born child”. Also, the act ensures women to take care of her child without having worry about loss of her job and loss of her employment. Design/methodology/approach This paper carries efforts of researcher done on the topic of “Impact of Maternity Benefits Act, 1961 (Amendment 2017)” and measures its impact on employers and job employment of working mothers in India through literature review from various sources like SCOPUS, EMERALD, EBSCO, PROQUEST, SAGE, etc. The paper opted for an exploratory study using the questionnaire approach of grounded theory, including 50 in-depth interviews of working mothers. Findings Outcome of this describes both positive and negative implications of this amendment on businesses and job employment of working mothers. It throws the limelight on implementation of this act in real life and identification of problems and stress faced by women employee either to get the job or to retain the job during pregnancy period which is very hazardous to the health of women and her inborn child also. Research limitations/implications Because of the chosen research approach, the research results may lack generalizability. Therefore, researchers are encouraged to test the proposed propositions further. Practical implications The paper includes implications of the Maternity Benefits Act, 1961 (Amendment 2017) on employers whether to hire women employee or not and on women though they are having capability to do work but because of ignorance of government on ensuring proper implementation of act, women are not getting opportunity to work after baby birth. Originality/value This paper fulfils an identified need to study and find some measures for effective implantation of Maternity Benefits Act, 1961 (Amendment 2017) so as to protect and regulate employment of women workers before and after child birth so as to increase female labour force participation rate.
《1961年产妇福利法》[2017年修正案]对印度职业母亲就业的影响
目的本文旨在阐明《1961年产妇福利法》(2017年修正案)对职业母亲就业的影响。它从印度政府的角度提出了对妇女就业有积极影响的某些事实,但同时也强调了雇主和职业母亲面临的一些负面影响。该法案的目的是向妇女提供经济援助,使其免于从事任何工作,以保护“新妈妈”和“新生儿”的健康。此外,该法案确保妇女在不担心失业和失业的情况下照顾孩子。设计/方法论/方法本文通过对SCOPUS、EMERALD、EBSCO、PROQUEST、SAGE等各种来源的文献综述,对“1961年《生育福利法》(2017年修正案)的影响”这一主题进行了研究,并衡量了其对印度雇主和职业母亲就业的影响。本文采用扎根理论的问卷调查方法进行了探索性研究,包括对50位职场母亲的深入访谈。调查结果描述了这项修正案对职业母亲的商业和就业的积极和消极影响。它突出了这项法案在现实生活中的实施,以及女性员工在怀孕期间获得工作或保留工作所面临的问题和压力的识别,这对女性及其先天子女的健康也非常有害。研究局限性/含义由于所选择的研究方法,研究结果可能缺乏可推广性。因此,鼓励研究人员进一步检验所提出的命题。实际含义该文件包括1961年《产妇福利法》(2017年修正案)对雇主是否雇佣女雇员的影响,以及对妇女的影响,尽管她们有能力工作,但由于政府不了解该法的正确实施,妇女在婴儿出生后没有机会工作。原创性/价值本文满足了一个明确的需求,即研究并找到一些有效实施1961年《产妇福利法》(2017年修正案)的措施,以保护和规范女工在分娩前后的就业,从而提高女性劳动力的参与率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Management is a leading journal addressing all aspects of regulation and law as they impact on organisational development, operations and leadership. Organisations and their leaders operate in an increasingly complex world of emerging regulation across national and international boundaries. The International Journal of Law and Management seeks to acknowledge the dynamics of that environment and provide a platform for articles and contributions to stimulate scholarly debate in the development of law and practice. The International Journal of Law and Management seeks to present the latest research on policy, practice and theoretical perspectives and their impact on the development and leadership of organisations. Contributions of a multi-disciplinary nature are welcome. Coverage includes, but is not limited to: -Employment and industrial law- Corporate governance and social responsibility- Intellectual property- Corporate law and finance- Insolvency- Commercial law and consumer protection- Environmental law- Taxation- Competition law- Regulatory theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信