Status of Respectful Maternal Care in Ndola and Kitwe Districts of Zambia

H. T. Nyirenda, David Mulenga, Tambulani Nyirenda, Nancy Choka, P. Agina, Brenda Mubita, Rehema Chengo, Shiphrah Kuria, H. Nyirenda
{"title":"Status of Respectful Maternal Care in Ndola and Kitwe Districts of Zambia","authors":"H. T. Nyirenda, David Mulenga, Tambulani Nyirenda, Nancy Choka, P. Agina, Brenda Mubita, Rehema Chengo, Shiphrah Kuria, H. Nyirenda","doi":"10.4172/2090-7214.1000297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The purpose of the assessment was to conduct an evaluation on the status of respectful maternal care Ndola and Kitwe districts in the Copperbelt Province. \n \nMethods: The assessment used a cross-sectional study design and captured quantitative data on self-reporting of experiences of respectful maternal care during child birth among women in the reproductive age group with a child below the age of 2 years. The study was conducted in two urban districts of the Copperbelt Province of Zambia specifically in Ndola and Kitwe districts. The sample size was 471 resident women of the selected 18 high volume health facilities. Cluster sampling was used to select the sampling units referred to as catchment areas of the health facilities. A structured interview questionnaire was used to conduct household interviews. Univariate and bivariate analysis were conducted on quantitative data to provide descriptive statistics. Chi-square analysis was performed to ascertain associations. \n \nResults: The study successfully visited and interviewed 470 women in household giving a 99% response rate. Findings show that 31% were aged between 20 to 24 years, three quarters (75%) were married/living with a partner, 4 in 10 (40%) had a basic education and two-thirds (66%) were not engaged in any form of employment or economic activity. The findings show that on average, 18% of the women had experienced physical abuse by a service provider during child birth. Prominent issues that led to ill-treatment included 43% of the women not provided comfort/pain-relief. On average 41% of the women received non-consented care from the service provider. Women (74%) indicated that the service provider did not allow women to assume position of choice during birth. The findings also show that about 22% of women’s right to confidentiality and privacy were not adhered to. Women (42%) also reported that there were no drapes or covering to protect their privacy and 19% indicated that there were no curtains or other visual barrier to protect woman during exams. Findings also show that on average 31% of women’s right to dignified care was not adhered to. Overall in the study, 13% of the women were discriminated based on specific attributes. The findings indicate that on average 39% of the women were abandoned or denied care. Key issues include, 65% of the women reported being left without care or unattended to and 28% service provider did not respond in a timely way. Further, only 6% of the women were detained in the health facility. \n \nConclusion: The maternal outcomes observed such as home deliveries and deliveries by skilled and unskilled birth attendants mirror the quality of care in health facilities. Indications of non-adherence to the rights of child bearing women are a barrier to achieving quality of care for child bearing women. There is need to comprehensively train service providers in respectful maternal care and devise mechanisms for implementation and supportive supervision.","PeriodicalId":92765,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in mother and child health","volume":"15 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in mother and child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2090-7214.1000297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the assessment was to conduct an evaluation on the status of respectful maternal care Ndola and Kitwe districts in the Copperbelt Province. Methods: The assessment used a cross-sectional study design and captured quantitative data on self-reporting of experiences of respectful maternal care during child birth among women in the reproductive age group with a child below the age of 2 years. The study was conducted in two urban districts of the Copperbelt Province of Zambia specifically in Ndola and Kitwe districts. The sample size was 471 resident women of the selected 18 high volume health facilities. Cluster sampling was used to select the sampling units referred to as catchment areas of the health facilities. A structured interview questionnaire was used to conduct household interviews. Univariate and bivariate analysis were conducted on quantitative data to provide descriptive statistics. Chi-square analysis was performed to ascertain associations. Results: The study successfully visited and interviewed 470 women in household giving a 99% response rate. Findings show that 31% were aged between 20 to 24 years, three quarters (75%) were married/living with a partner, 4 in 10 (40%) had a basic education and two-thirds (66%) were not engaged in any form of employment or economic activity. The findings show that on average, 18% of the women had experienced physical abuse by a service provider during child birth. Prominent issues that led to ill-treatment included 43% of the women not provided comfort/pain-relief. On average 41% of the women received non-consented care from the service provider. Women (74%) indicated that the service provider did not allow women to assume position of choice during birth. The findings also show that about 22% of women’s right to confidentiality and privacy were not adhered to. Women (42%) also reported that there were no drapes or covering to protect their privacy and 19% indicated that there were no curtains or other visual barrier to protect woman during exams. Findings also show that on average 31% of women’s right to dignified care was not adhered to. Overall in the study, 13% of the women were discriminated based on specific attributes. The findings indicate that on average 39% of the women were abandoned or denied care. Key issues include, 65% of the women reported being left without care or unattended to and 28% service provider did not respond in a timely way. Further, only 6% of the women were detained in the health facility. Conclusion: The maternal outcomes observed such as home deliveries and deliveries by skilled and unskilled birth attendants mirror the quality of care in health facilities. Indications of non-adherence to the rights of child bearing women are a barrier to achieving quality of care for child bearing women. There is need to comprehensively train service providers in respectful maternal care and devise mechanisms for implementation and supportive supervision.
赞比亚恩多拉和基特韦地区尊重产妇护理的状况
背景:评估的目的是对铜带省Ndola和Kitwe地区尊重产妇护理的状况进行评估。方法:评估采用了横断面研究设计,并收集了育龄组中有2岁以下儿童的妇女在分娩过程中尊重产妇护理经验的自我报告的定量数据。这项研究是在赞比亚铜带省的两个市区,特别是恩多拉和基特韦区进行的。样本量为选定的18个高容量保健设施的471名常驻妇女。采用整群抽样来选择被称为卫生设施集水区的抽样单位。采用结构化访谈问卷进行入户访谈。对定量数据进行单因素和双因素分析,提供描述性统计。进行卡方分析以确定相关性。结果:本研究成功访问了470名家庭妇女,回复率达99%。调查结果显示,31%的人年龄在20至24岁之间,四分之三(75%)的人已婚或与伴侣同居,十分之四(40%)的人受过基础教育,三分之二(66%)的人没有从事任何形式的就业或经济活动。调查结果显示,平均而言,18%的妇女在分娩期间遭受过服务提供者的身体虐待。导致虐待的突出问题包括43%的妇女没有得到安慰/缓解疼痛。平均41%的妇女接受了服务提供者未经同意的护理。妇女(74%)表示,服务提供者不允许妇女在分娩时选择姿势。调查结果还显示,约22%的女性保密和隐私权没有得到遵守。妇女(42%)还报告说,没有窗帘或遮盖物来保护她们的隐私,19%的妇女表示,在考试期间没有窗帘或其他视觉障碍来保护妇女。调查结果还显示,平均有31%的妇女享有有尊严护理的权利没有得到遵守。总体而言,在这项研究中,13%的女性受到了基于特定属性的歧视。调查结果表明,平均39%的妇女被遗弃或得不到护理。关键问题包括,65%的妇女报告没有得到照顾或无人照顾,28%的服务提供者没有及时回应。此外,只有6%的妇女被拘留在卫生设施中。结论:观察到的产妇结果,如在家分娩和由熟练和不熟练的助产士分娩,反映了卫生机构的护理质量。不遵守育龄妇女权利的迹象是实现育龄妇女护理质量的障碍。有必要全面培训服务提供者尊重产妇护理,并制定实施和支持性监督机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信