Evaluation of the surface characteristics of nickel–titanium rotary instruments after clinical use: An atomic force microscope study

Q3 Dentistry
N. Jain, S. Nagaraja, S. Mathew, Bhawna Jethani, Mohini Kumari, Sharanya Nambiar, Soumya Sasank
{"title":"Evaluation of the surface characteristics of nickel–titanium rotary instruments after clinical use: An atomic force microscope study","authors":"N. Jain, S. Nagaraja, S. Mathew, Bhawna Jethani, Mohini Kumari, Sharanya Nambiar, Soumya Sasank","doi":"10.4103/endo.endo_230_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aimed to compare the surface roughness of two rotary nickel–titanium instrument systems before and after clinical use using atomic force microscope (AFM). Methods: Sixteen instruments of two rotary nickel–titanium systems were used in this study. Eight MTwo (VDW, Munich, Germany) instruments and eight Neoendo flex rotary files (Orikam Healthcare, India) were evaluated. New and the used rotary files of the two experimental groups were evaluated. Instruments were analyzed on a point at a 5-mm section from the tip of the instrument. Quantitative measurements according to the topographical deviations were recorded. The data were statistically analyzed with paired t-test and independent samples t-test. Results: The mean root mean square (RMS) values for new and used MTwo 25.06 files were 1.23 ± 0.176 nm and 1.58 ± 0.284 nm, respectively, and the difference between them was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The mean RMS values for new and used NeoEndo Flex Files 25.06 were 0.96 ± 0.34 nm and 1.76 ± 0.414 nm, respectively; the difference between them also was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: According to the AFM analysis, the instruments underwent surface deterioration after clinical use and MTwo had better surface quality than NeoEndo Flex Files.","PeriodicalId":11607,"journal":{"name":"Endodontology","volume":"35 1","pages":"43 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_230_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to compare the surface roughness of two rotary nickel–titanium instrument systems before and after clinical use using atomic force microscope (AFM). Methods: Sixteen instruments of two rotary nickel–titanium systems were used in this study. Eight MTwo (VDW, Munich, Germany) instruments and eight Neoendo flex rotary files (Orikam Healthcare, India) were evaluated. New and the used rotary files of the two experimental groups were evaluated. Instruments were analyzed on a point at a 5-mm section from the tip of the instrument. Quantitative measurements according to the topographical deviations were recorded. The data were statistically analyzed with paired t-test and independent samples t-test. Results: The mean root mean square (RMS) values for new and used MTwo 25.06 files were 1.23 ± 0.176 nm and 1.58 ± 0.284 nm, respectively, and the difference between them was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The mean RMS values for new and used NeoEndo Flex Files 25.06 were 0.96 ± 0.34 nm and 1.76 ± 0.414 nm, respectively; the difference between them also was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: According to the AFM analysis, the instruments underwent surface deterioration after clinical use and MTwo had better surface quality than NeoEndo Flex Files.
镍钛旋转器械临床使用后表面特性的评价:原子力显微镜研究
目的:本研究旨在利用原子力显微镜(AFM)比较两种旋转镍钛仪器系统在临床使用前后的表面粗糙度。方法:采用两种旋转镍钛系统的16台仪器进行研究。对8台MTwo(德国慕尼黑VDW)仪器和8台Neoendo-flex旋转锉(印度Orikam Healthcare)进行了评估。对两个实验组的新的和使用过的旋转锉进行了评估。在距离仪器尖端5毫米处的一个点上分析仪器。记录了根据地形偏差进行的定量测量。采用配对t检验和独立样本t检验对数据进行统计学分析。结果:新使用的MTwo 25.06锉的均方根值分别为1.23±0.176nm和1.58±0.284nm,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);结论:AFM分析表明,临床使用后仪器表面发生了劣化,MTwo的表面质量优于NeoEndo Flex Files。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endodontology
Endodontology Medicine-Anatomy
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信