The politics and the music mainstream in Central and Eastern Europe: introduction

Karel Šima, Zdeněk Nebřenský
{"title":"The politics and the music mainstream in Central and Eastern Europe: introduction","authors":"Karel Šima, Zdeněk Nebřenský","doi":"10.1080/25739638.2022.2092259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While in Western Europe and the USA the intersection between politics and music mainstream has been studied from theoretical and empirical perspectives for decades, in Central and Eastern Europe this kind of research has been very limited. So far much has been written about how protest, resistance, and the counterculture generated by popular music undermined communist dictatorships (Rybak 1990; Klaniczay and Trencsényi 2011). No less attention has been paid to the spread and adoption of Western popular music in the Soviet Bloc through which East Europeans culturally and politically colonized themselves before and after the fall of communism (Yurchak 2006; Mazierska and Gregory 2015). Popular music also found an important place in the political transformation and transition to democracy (Ramet 1994; Buchanan 2006). The nuanced approach was offered by the concept of aesthetic cosmopolitanism that understands popular music in Eastern Europe as an autonomous product that was developing according to its own logic in the global context (Mazierska 2016). In these works, scholars reflected just partially on the intersection of the political and music mainstream. Following in the steps of Ewa Mazierska, this thematic issue attempts to challenge the Iron Curtain paradigm in popular music studies and more importantly to look at how popular music was produced, distributed, and consumed in the entangled web of political powers that goes well beyond the East-West divide and the capitalism-communism dichotomy. The issue seeks to analyse the role of popular music in a broader scope concerning genres and scenes. Apart from rock labelled as the soundtrack to communism’s demise, the issue tries to cover disco and electro-dance (“disco polo”). Moreover, the issue traces long-term legacies across the political changes in the region. It strives to cover the period from the 1960s when popular music became a key factor in building a mass consumerist youth culture (Shuker 2001) and it seeks to look at dis/continuities up to the present wave of populism and re-nationalization in Central and Eastern Europe. The approach combining politics and music mainstream has been already acknowledged. With a strong starting reference in Theodor W. Adorno and the Frankfurt school, music has been analysed as an artistic expression that both represents and undermines social, political and economic order. Along this line Jacques Attali, a political advisor who congenially coupled political and economic expertise with aesthetic theory, saw the role of the political economy in","PeriodicalId":37199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe","volume":"30 1","pages":"141 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25739638.2022.2092259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While in Western Europe and the USA the intersection between politics and music mainstream has been studied from theoretical and empirical perspectives for decades, in Central and Eastern Europe this kind of research has been very limited. So far much has been written about how protest, resistance, and the counterculture generated by popular music undermined communist dictatorships (Rybak 1990; Klaniczay and Trencsényi 2011). No less attention has been paid to the spread and adoption of Western popular music in the Soviet Bloc through which East Europeans culturally and politically colonized themselves before and after the fall of communism (Yurchak 2006; Mazierska and Gregory 2015). Popular music also found an important place in the political transformation and transition to democracy (Ramet 1994; Buchanan 2006). The nuanced approach was offered by the concept of aesthetic cosmopolitanism that understands popular music in Eastern Europe as an autonomous product that was developing according to its own logic in the global context (Mazierska 2016). In these works, scholars reflected just partially on the intersection of the political and music mainstream. Following in the steps of Ewa Mazierska, this thematic issue attempts to challenge the Iron Curtain paradigm in popular music studies and more importantly to look at how popular music was produced, distributed, and consumed in the entangled web of political powers that goes well beyond the East-West divide and the capitalism-communism dichotomy. The issue seeks to analyse the role of popular music in a broader scope concerning genres and scenes. Apart from rock labelled as the soundtrack to communism’s demise, the issue tries to cover disco and electro-dance (“disco polo”). Moreover, the issue traces long-term legacies across the political changes in the region. It strives to cover the period from the 1960s when popular music became a key factor in building a mass consumerist youth culture (Shuker 2001) and it seeks to look at dis/continuities up to the present wave of populism and re-nationalization in Central and Eastern Europe. The approach combining politics and music mainstream has been already acknowledged. With a strong starting reference in Theodor W. Adorno and the Frankfurt school, music has been analysed as an artistic expression that both represents and undermines social, political and economic order. Along this line Jacques Attali, a political advisor who congenially coupled political and economic expertise with aesthetic theory, saw the role of the political economy in
中欧和东欧的政治与音乐主流:导论
尽管在西欧和美国,几十年来一直从理论和实证的角度研究政治与音乐主流之间的交叉点,但在中欧和东欧,这种研究非常有限。到目前为止,人们已经写了很多关于抗议、抵抗和流行音乐产生的反主流文化如何破坏共产主义独裁统治的文章(Rybak 1990;Klaniczay和Trencényi,2011年)。人们同样关注西方流行音乐在苏联集团的传播和采用,在共产主义垮台前后,东欧人通过苏联集团在文化和政治上进行殖民(Yurchak 2006;马泽尔斯卡和格雷戈里,2015年)。流行音乐在政治转型和向民主过渡中也占有重要地位(Ramet 1994;布坎南,2006年)。这种微妙的方法是由美学世界主义的概念提供的,它将东欧的流行音乐理解为一种自主产品,在全球背景下根据自己的逻辑发展(Mazierska,2016)。在这些作品中,学者们只是部分地反思了政治与音乐主流的交叉。跟随埃瓦·马齐尔斯卡的脚步,本专题试图挑战流行音乐研究中的铁幕范式,更重要的是,探讨流行音乐是如何在政治权力的纠缠网络中产生、传播和消费的,这远远超出了东西方分歧和资本主义-共产主义的二分法。本期旨在从更广泛的流派和场景角度分析流行音乐的作用。除了被称为共产主义灭亡的原声音乐的摇滚乐外,这期杂志还试图涵盖迪斯科和电子舞(“迪斯科马球”)。此外,这个问题追溯了该地区政治变革的长期遗留问题。它试图涵盖20世纪60年代流行音乐成为建立大众消费主义青年文化的关键因素的时期(Shuker 2001),并试图审视当前中欧和东欧民粹主义和重新民族化浪潮的不连续性。将政治和音乐主流相结合的方法已经得到了认可。在西奥多·W·阿多诺和法兰克福学派的有力开端中,音乐被分析为一种艺术表达,既代表又破坏社会、政治和经济秩序。沿着这条线,政治顾问雅克·阿塔利将政治和经济专业知识与美学理论巧妙地结合在一起,他看到了政治经济学在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信