Networked “bubbles”: study workgroups’ spatial adjacency preference using social network analysis methods

IF 2.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Yaoyi Zhou, C. Tagliaro, Ying Hua
{"title":"Networked “bubbles”: study workgroups’ spatial adjacency preference using social network analysis methods","authors":"Yaoyi Zhou, C. Tagliaro, Ying Hua","doi":"10.1108/jcre-06-2020-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIn large organizations, space planning relies on workgroup leaders to indicate spatial adjacency preferences. However, many factors affect workgroups’ adjacency preferences, and it is not clear how the choices are made. This paper aims to explore whether the adjacency preferences are influenced by the collaboration relationship or constrained by the organizational structure.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors studied a large company’s spatial adjacency planning with an in-depth analysis of its formal organizational structure and collaboration network. A sample of 183 managers was surveyed regarding groups with whom they want to be spatially adjacent and groups with whom they mostly interact. The data enabled us to test three structural factors related to adjacency preference: department affiliation, workgroup’s prestige and collaboration relation. The authors used the quadratic assignment procedure analysis to examine the correlations between network matrices.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results suggest that department affiliation and collaboration relations are significantly correlated to adjacency preferences. The authors did not find evidence supporting the notion that a workgroup’s prestige affects the preference. Among the three factors, collaboration relation best predicts the preference, which echoes Pena et al.’s (1977) argument that space planners should look into how groups function, rather than merely following the organizational chart.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this research was the first to explore the choice of spatially adjacent workgroup through a detailed network analysis of the formal structure, work collaboration relations and other group-level characteristics. The findings have noteworthy cross-disciplinary implications, given that spatial proximity can be taken as a human resource management strategy to facilitate the overall interactions between workgroups.\n","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":"23 1","pages":"87-105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-06-2020-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose In large organizations, space planning relies on workgroup leaders to indicate spatial adjacency preferences. However, many factors affect workgroups’ adjacency preferences, and it is not clear how the choices are made. This paper aims to explore whether the adjacency preferences are influenced by the collaboration relationship or constrained by the organizational structure. Design/methodology/approach The authors studied a large company’s spatial adjacency planning with an in-depth analysis of its formal organizational structure and collaboration network. A sample of 183 managers was surveyed regarding groups with whom they want to be spatially adjacent and groups with whom they mostly interact. The data enabled us to test three structural factors related to adjacency preference: department affiliation, workgroup’s prestige and collaboration relation. The authors used the quadratic assignment procedure analysis to examine the correlations between network matrices. Findings The results suggest that department affiliation and collaboration relations are significantly correlated to adjacency preferences. The authors did not find evidence supporting the notion that a workgroup’s prestige affects the preference. Among the three factors, collaboration relation best predicts the preference, which echoes Pena et al.’s (1977) argument that space planners should look into how groups function, rather than merely following the organizational chart. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this research was the first to explore the choice of spatially adjacent workgroup through a detailed network analysis of the formal structure, work collaboration relations and other group-level characteristics. The findings have noteworthy cross-disciplinary implications, given that spatial proximity can be taken as a human resource management strategy to facilitate the overall interactions between workgroups.
网络“气泡”:运用社会网络分析方法研究工作群体的空间邻接偏好
目的在大型组织中,空间规划依赖于工作组领导来指示空间邻接性偏好。然而,许多因素会影响工作组的邻接偏好,而且目前尚不清楚这些选择是如何做出的。本文旨在探讨邻接偏好是受合作关系的影响还是受组织结构的约束。设计/方法/途径作者研究了一家大型公司的空间邻接规划,并对其正式组织结构和协作网络进行了深入分析。对183名经理进行了抽样调查,内容涉及他们希望在空间上与哪些群体相邻,以及他们最常与哪些群体互动。这些数据使我们能够测试与邻接偏好相关的三个结构性因素:部门隶属关系、工作组声望和协作关系。作者使用二次分配程序分析来检验网络矩阵之间的相关性。结果表明,部门隶属关系和协作关系与邻接偏好显著相关。作者没有发现证据支持工作组的声望影响偏好的观点。在这三个因素中,合作关系最能预测偏好,这与Pena等人(1977)的观点相呼应,即空间规划者应该研究群体的功能,而不仅仅是遵循组织结构图。据作者所知,本研究首次通过对正式结构、工作协作关系和其他群体层面特征的详细网络分析,探讨了空间相邻工作组的选择。考虑到空间接近性可以作为促进工作组之间整体互动的人力资源管理策略,该研究结果具有值得注意的跨学科意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信