A decision-making framework to prioritize existing buildings for adaptive reuse with a case study of school buildings in Guilan, Iran

IF 1.8 3区艺术学 N/A ARCHITECTURE

Architectural Science Review Pub Date : 2023-02-10 DOI:10.1080/00038628.2023.2174067

M. Pourebrahimi, Amir Reza Karimi Azeri, Mojtaba Pour Ahmadi

{"title":"A decision-making framework to prioritize existing buildings for adaptive reuse with a case study of school buildings in Guilan, Iran","authors":"M. Pourebrahimi, Amir Reza Karimi Azeri, Mojtaba Pour Ahmadi","doi":"10.1080/00038628.2023.2174067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper seeks to outline a framework to prioritize existing buildings for adaptive reuse. Twenty-nine schools were selected and investigated to determine their priority for adaptive reuse. By evaluating obsolescence and calculating the useful life of the buildings, their potential for reuse was identified using Adaptive Reuse Potential (ARP) model. According to the reuse potential and best time for reuse intervention, these projects were prioritized. By determining the most important obsolescence types and setting priorities among them according to their impact on reducing the buildings’ useful life, different strategies to mitigate/avoid each obsolescence have been discussed. The results show that functional, technological and physical obsolescence are the most important types of obsolescence respectively. Also, according to the results the average effective useful life of all case studies is 54%. Therefore, with the persistenceof the current conditions, only about half of the expected life of the cases will be utilized.","PeriodicalId":47295,"journal":{"name":"Architectural Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architectural Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2023.2174067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper seeks to outline a framework to prioritize existing buildings for adaptive reuse. Twenty-nine schools were selected and investigated to determine their priority for adaptive reuse. By evaluating obsolescence and calculating the useful life of the buildings, their potential for reuse was identified using Adaptive Reuse Potential (ARP) model. According to the reuse potential and best time for reuse intervention, these projects were prioritized. By determining the most important obsolescence types and setting priorities among them according to their impact on reducing the buildings’ useful life, different strategies to mitigate/avoid each obsolescence have been discussed. The results show that functional, technological and physical obsolescence are the most important types of obsolescence respectively. Also, according to the results the average effective useful life of all case studies is 54%. Therefore, with the persistenceof the current conditions, only about half of the expected life of the cases will be utilized.

查看原文本刊更多论文

优先考虑现有建筑进行适应性再利用的决策框架——以伊朗吉兰的学校建筑为例

该文件试图概述一个框架，以优先考虑现有建筑的适应性再利用。选择并调查了29所学校，以确定其适应性再利用的优先顺序。通过评估过时情况和计算建筑物的使用寿命，使用自适应再利用潜力（ARP）模型来识别其再利用潜力。根据复用潜力和复用干预的最佳时间，对这些项目进行了优先排序。通过确定最重要的报废类型，并根据其对缩短建筑物使用寿命的影响确定优先级，讨论了缓解/避免每次报废的不同策略。结果表明，功能过时、技术过时和物理过时分别是最重要的过时类型。此外，根据研究结果，所有案例研究的平均有效使用寿命为54%。因此，在目前条件持续的情况下，只有大约一半的案件预期寿命会被利用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Architectural Science Review ARCHITECTURE-

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

8.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Founded at the University of Sydney in 1958 by Professor Henry Cowan to promote continued professional development, Architectural Science Review presents a balanced collection of papers on a wide range of topics. From its first issue over 50 years ago the journal documents the profession’s interest in environmental issues, covering topics such as thermal comfort, lighting, and sustainable architecture, contributing to this extensive field of knowledge by seeking papers from a broad geographical area. The journal is supported by an international editorial advisory board of the leading international academics and its reputation has increased globally with individual and institutional subscribers and contributors from around the world. As a result, Architectural Science Review continues to be recognised as not only one of the first, but the leading journal devoted to architectural science, technology and the built environment. Architectural Science Review publishes original research papers, shorter research notes, and abstracts of PhD dissertations and theses in all areas of architectural science including: -building science and technology -environmental sustainability -structures and materials -audio and acoustics -illumination -thermal systems -building physics -building services -building climatology -building economics -ergonomics -history and theory of architectural science -the social sciences of architecture

文献相关原料

公司名称	产品信息	采购帮参考价格