Labour and globalisation: complexity and transformation

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
R. Munck
{"title":"Labour and globalisation: complexity and transformation","authors":"R. Munck","doi":"10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2021.185370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a matter of balance of the contributions joined in the Dossier, this final word draws a comprehensive picture of the issues discussed by the authors and raises some questions pointing to a possible agenda for current labor studies. First, it sparks reflections going in the sense of discussing the actual meaning of what is to be considered either “normal” or “healthy” after Covid-19 crisis. Then it addresses such discussion to the world of work with interesting consequences, asking what is actually “normal” in labor relations. In the same vein, it reminds us the role of the so-called “essential workers” during the sanitary crisis: a lot of invisible realities which are now becoming visible. On the other side, the author call attention to imminent economic crisis, affecting jobs and companies. Similarly, he warns about the worsening of the working conditions under a post-Covid world: no “return to normal” is envisioned without shaking important structures of the already-known world. One of those pillars is the North-South divide: according to the author, that divide is loosing because the neat two-worlds mapping is blurred today – we find informality on both “worlds”, as well as either digital economy and inequalites are present North and South, so clear-cut differences may tend to disappear. The author finally proceeds to make a short comment about every of the contributions to the dossier, pointing out what is crucial and distinctive in each of them.","PeriodicalId":45182,"journal":{"name":"Tempo Social","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tempo Social","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2021.185370","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As a matter of balance of the contributions joined in the Dossier, this final word draws a comprehensive picture of the issues discussed by the authors and raises some questions pointing to a possible agenda for current labor studies. First, it sparks reflections going in the sense of discussing the actual meaning of what is to be considered either “normal” or “healthy” after Covid-19 crisis. Then it addresses such discussion to the world of work with interesting consequences, asking what is actually “normal” in labor relations. In the same vein, it reminds us the role of the so-called “essential workers” during the sanitary crisis: a lot of invisible realities which are now becoming visible. On the other side, the author call attention to imminent economic crisis, affecting jobs and companies. Similarly, he warns about the worsening of the working conditions under a post-Covid world: no “return to normal” is envisioned without shaking important structures of the already-known world. One of those pillars is the North-South divide: according to the author, that divide is loosing because the neat two-worlds mapping is blurred today – we find informality on both “worlds”, as well as either digital economy and inequalites are present North and South, so clear-cut differences may tend to disappear. The author finally proceeds to make a short comment about every of the contributions to the dossier, pointing out what is crucial and distinctive in each of them.
劳工与全球化:复杂性与转型
为了平衡档案中的贡献,最后一句话对作者讨论的问题进行了全面的描述,并提出了一些问题,指出了当前劳工研究的可能议程。首先,它引发了思考,即讨论新冠肺炎危机后“正常”或“健康”的实际含义。然后,它将这种讨论带到了工作世界,并产生了有趣的后果,询问劳动关系中什么才是真正的“正常”。同样,它提醒我们所谓的“必要工人”在卫生危机中的作用:许多看不见的现实现在变得显而易见。另一方面,作者呼吁人们关注迫在眉睫的经济危机,影响到就业和企业。同样,他对新冠疫情后世界的工作条件恶化发出警告:如果不动摇已知世界的重要结构,就无法“恢复正常”。其中一个支柱是南北差距:根据作者的说法,这种差距正在缩小,因为今天两个世界的清晰地图已经模糊了——我们在两个“世界”上都发现了非正规性,而且数字经济和不平等现象都存在于南北之间,因此明显的差异可能会消失。作者最后对档案中的每一项贡献都做了简短的评论,指出了其中的关键和独特之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tempo Social
Tempo Social SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
42 weeks
期刊介绍: Tempo Social to publish original contributions in Sociology; Sociological Theory; Other specific sociologies. Its abbreviated title is Tempo soc., which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and and bibliographical references and strips.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信