Criminal Law Policy of Justice Collaborator in Corruption Crime Case

Khrisna Lintang Satrio Nugroho
{"title":"Criminal Law Policy of Justice Collaborator in Corruption Crime Case","authors":"Khrisna Lintang Satrio Nugroho","doi":"10.14710/LR.V17I1.37550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trial of criminal law cases is highly important to prove misconduct in a case. In respect to the evidence of corruption criminal act, an insider is needed as a perpetrator of the offence who works with the investigators, or usually called justice collaborator. The main focus of this study is to examine criminal law policy on the concept of justice collaborator in corruption criminal act and how the legal punishment is for justice collaborators in corruption criminal act. This study is a descriptive research using juridical normative approach. Data used in this study were secondary data. Case study approach was applied in this study. This means that the researcher makes a comparison of cases on the implementation of justice collaborator which is based on a study of a verdict.  According to the result of the research, it is indicated that up to now there has not been conformity in terms of legal regulations or interpretation of the concept of Whistle blower and Justice Collaborator. There has not been mutual understanding in terms of the conviction of the perpetrator who is willing to work with the investigators to uncover a corruption criminal act. This leads to disparity in the making of verdict for the offender.","PeriodicalId":33353,"journal":{"name":"Law Reform Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Reform Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/LR.V17I1.37550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trial of criminal law cases is highly important to prove misconduct in a case. In respect to the evidence of corruption criminal act, an insider is needed as a perpetrator of the offence who works with the investigators, or usually called justice collaborator. The main focus of this study is to examine criminal law policy on the concept of justice collaborator in corruption criminal act and how the legal punishment is for justice collaborators in corruption criminal act. This study is a descriptive research using juridical normative approach. Data used in this study were secondary data. Case study approach was applied in this study. This means that the researcher makes a comparison of cases on the implementation of justice collaborator which is based on a study of a verdict.  According to the result of the research, it is indicated that up to now there has not been conformity in terms of legal regulations or interpretation of the concept of Whistle blower and Justice Collaborator. There has not been mutual understanding in terms of the conviction of the perpetrator who is willing to work with the investigators to uncover a corruption criminal act. This leads to disparity in the making of verdict for the offender.
贪污犯罪案件中司法合作者的刑法政策
刑事案件的审判对于证明案件中的不当行为非常重要。关于腐败犯罪行为的证据,需要一名与调查人员合作的犯罪行为人,或者通常被称为司法合作者。本研究的主要焦点是考察刑法政策对腐败犯罪行为中司法合作者的概念以及法律如何惩罚腐败犯罪行为的司法合作者。本研究采用司法规范的方法进行描述性研究。本研究中使用的数据为次要数据。本研究采用案例研究法。这意味着研究人员在对判决的研究基础上,对司法合作者的执行情况进行了比较。研究结果表明,到目前为止,举报人和司法合作者的概念在法律规定或解释方面还不一致。对于愿意与调查人员合作揭露腐败犯罪行为的犯罪者的定罪问题,双方尚未达成共识。这导致在对罪犯作出判决方面存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信