“None of it is important or all of it is”: Steinbeck, Ricketts, Ecology, and Identity

IF 0.9 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
C. McGonigle
{"title":"“None of it is important or all of it is”: Steinbeck, Ricketts, Ecology, and Identity","authors":"C. McGonigle","doi":"10.5325/steinbeckreview.19.2.0191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Interdisciplinarity emerges as a strong theme from the Log from the Sea of Cortez, based on the shared experience of Steinbeck and Ricketts and their influence on one another’s thinking and writing. This article reflects inquiry based on personal experiences as a contemporary marine scientist. It discusses the role and importance of scientific outreach, in particular the role of popularizers in connecting with audiences from diverse backgrounds and education levels. These concepts are explored in relation to an interdisciplinary reading group held as part of the Steinbeck Festival in Northern Ireland that was designed to build common language, to create discourse between the arts and science, and to understand the marine environment and our place within it. It explores issues of identity, systems of classification, and ways of understanding complex systems such as the environment and ecology as related to the personal and the sense of self. All these themes are explored in the Log to varying degrees and work in a complementary way. Technology and development are important and inextricably linked, from communications to methods of interrogation for the environment. As the technology improves, our ability to understand the environment changes, but “common” resources are then subject to market demands. We contrast the speed and efficacy of contemporary marine science with the contemplative Darwinian pace of the Western Flyer in the Log, and suggest that there is value in both approaches. The industrial scale and pace of modern scientific expeditions can present obstacles to the intimacy of experience within the environment, and there is much value to the bucket and spade approaches to build this rapport and affinity with the subject. This has an inherent value of its own and is worth conserving. The article concludes that for interdisciplinarity to succeed, it is essential to recognize that it is relationships between individuals that really gets things done--developing common language, a mutual appreciation, a spirit of cooperation, and the value of a shared endeavor.","PeriodicalId":40417,"journal":{"name":"Steinbeck Review","volume":"19 1","pages":"191 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Steinbeck Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/steinbeckreview.19.2.0191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Interdisciplinarity emerges as a strong theme from the Log from the Sea of Cortez, based on the shared experience of Steinbeck and Ricketts and their influence on one another’s thinking and writing. This article reflects inquiry based on personal experiences as a contemporary marine scientist. It discusses the role and importance of scientific outreach, in particular the role of popularizers in connecting with audiences from diverse backgrounds and education levels. These concepts are explored in relation to an interdisciplinary reading group held as part of the Steinbeck Festival in Northern Ireland that was designed to build common language, to create discourse between the arts and science, and to understand the marine environment and our place within it. It explores issues of identity, systems of classification, and ways of understanding complex systems such as the environment and ecology as related to the personal and the sense of self. All these themes are explored in the Log to varying degrees and work in a complementary way. Technology and development are important and inextricably linked, from communications to methods of interrogation for the environment. As the technology improves, our ability to understand the environment changes, but “common” resources are then subject to market demands. We contrast the speed and efficacy of contemporary marine science with the contemplative Darwinian pace of the Western Flyer in the Log, and suggest that there is value in both approaches. The industrial scale and pace of modern scientific expeditions can present obstacles to the intimacy of experience within the environment, and there is much value to the bucket and spade approaches to build this rapport and affinity with the subject. This has an inherent value of its own and is worth conserving. The article concludes that for interdisciplinarity to succeed, it is essential to recognize that it is relationships between individuals that really gets things done--developing common language, a mutual appreciation, a spirit of cooperation, and the value of a shared endeavor.
“这些都不重要,或者都不重要”:斯坦贝克、里基茨、生态学和身份
摘要:基于斯坦贝克和里基茨的共同经历以及他们对彼此思想和写作的影响,《来自科尔特斯海的日志》成为了一个强烈的主题。这篇文章反映了作为一个当代海洋科学家基于个人经验的探究。它讨论了科学推广的作用和重要性,特别是普及人员在与不同背景和教育水平的受众联系方面的作用。作为北爱尔兰斯坦贝克节的一部分,这些概念与一个跨学科阅读小组有关,该小组旨在建立共同的语言,在艺术和科学之间创造话语,并了解海洋环境和我们在其中的位置。它探讨了身份问题,分类系统,以及理解复杂系统的方式,如与个人和自我意识相关的环境和生态。所有这些主题都在不同程度上进行了探索,并以互补的方式发挥作用。从通信到环境审讯方法,技术和发展是重要的,而且密不可分。随着技术的进步,我们对环境的理解能力也发生了变化,但“公共”资源却受制于市场需求。我们将当代海洋科学的速度和效率与航海日志中西方飞行者沉思的达尔文式步伐进行了对比,并提出两种方法都有价值。现代科学考察的工业规模和速度可能会给环境中的亲密体验带来障碍,而用桶和铲子的方法来建立这种与主题的关系和亲和力是很有价值的。这有其自身的内在价值,值得保护。这篇文章的结论是,跨学科要想成功,必须认识到个体之间的关系才能真正把事情做好——发展共同的语言、相互欣赏、合作精神和共同努力的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Steinbeck Review
Steinbeck Review LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Steinbeck Review is an authorized publication on the life and works of American novelist John Steinbeck (1902–1968). It publishes scholarly articles; notes; book and performance reviews; creative writing; original artwork; and short intercalary pieces offering fresh perspectives, including notes on contemporary references to Steinbeck, discussions of the contexts of his work, and an occasional poem. Steinbeck Review has a threefold mission of broadening the scope of Steinbeck criticism, promoting the work of new and established scholars, and serving as a resource for Steinbeck teachers at all levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信