When theory meets praxis – enhancing heritage management through practice-led research at Great Zimbabwe World Heritage property

IF 1.1 Q4 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
T. Thondhlana, Tawanda Mukwende, L. Machiridza, T. Musindo, G. Tevera, Nyaradzayi Maduro
{"title":"When theory meets praxis – enhancing heritage management through practice-led research at Great Zimbabwe World Heritage property","authors":"T. Thondhlana, Tawanda Mukwende, L. Machiridza, T. Musindo, G. Tevera, Nyaradzayi Maduro","doi":"10.1108/jchmsd-08-2022-0149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to outline and reflect on the new research agenda for the Great Zimbabwe World Heritage property. This research agenda was jointly developed by academics and practitioners from Great Zimbabwe University (GZU) and the National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe (NMMZ) respectively. This Research-Practice Team was put together for the Heritage Place Lab (HPL), a pilot project of the ICCROM-IUCN World Heritage Leadership programme.Design/methodology/approachA series of steps were undertaken to come up with research priorities and a new research agenda that are presented in this paper. The HPL project involved online workshops, due to the COVID-19 travel restrictions, that were held between September 2021 and April 2022. The HPL methodology involved six assignments that were based on the Enhancing Our Heritage Toolkit 2.0 (EOH) which was being designed by UNESCO and its Advisory Bodies. This toolkit encouraged the team to establish site-specific management issues and research needs. The toolkit helped the team to have a detailed appreciation of the site's Outstanding Universal Value as well as other heritage values of national and local importance. The toolkit also involved the mapping of site attributes and multiple actors as well as the analysis of governance and legal frameworks. The toolkit also required the team to identify factors affecting the heritage property.FindingsThe Research-Practice Team highlighted challenges that resulted from the legacy of ill-informed research activities and conservation efforts at the World Heritage property. It became more apparent that the site managers were prioritizing the physical fabric of the site at the expense of the spiritual aspects. Lack of coordination among the actors was also undermining the governance structure. Four thematic strands which included local values and intangible cultural heritage elements; heritage governance; climate change and environmental sustainability and incorporation of local knowledge systems were identified for further research.Originality/valueThe paper is an outcome of collaborative efforts that were done by academics and practitioners. Researchers and site managers at Great Zimbabwe had hitherto worked in silos. The majority of previous and ongoing research on the World Heritage property falls short of addressing the dire management challenges. The paper is an attempt to broaden the scope in terms of the management of the site. In the past focus has been on the monumental aspects of the site with specific reference to the dry-stone walled structures. However, in this instance, the Research-Practice Team has integrated new interests such as the intangible aspects of Great Zimbabwe, spirituality and community beneficiation.","PeriodicalId":45408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jchmsd-08-2022-0149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to outline and reflect on the new research agenda for the Great Zimbabwe World Heritage property. This research agenda was jointly developed by academics and practitioners from Great Zimbabwe University (GZU) and the National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe (NMMZ) respectively. This Research-Practice Team was put together for the Heritage Place Lab (HPL), a pilot project of the ICCROM-IUCN World Heritage Leadership programme.Design/methodology/approachA series of steps were undertaken to come up with research priorities and a new research agenda that are presented in this paper. The HPL project involved online workshops, due to the COVID-19 travel restrictions, that were held between September 2021 and April 2022. The HPL methodology involved six assignments that were based on the Enhancing Our Heritage Toolkit 2.0 (EOH) which was being designed by UNESCO and its Advisory Bodies. This toolkit encouraged the team to establish site-specific management issues and research needs. The toolkit helped the team to have a detailed appreciation of the site's Outstanding Universal Value as well as other heritage values of national and local importance. The toolkit also involved the mapping of site attributes and multiple actors as well as the analysis of governance and legal frameworks. The toolkit also required the team to identify factors affecting the heritage property.FindingsThe Research-Practice Team highlighted challenges that resulted from the legacy of ill-informed research activities and conservation efforts at the World Heritage property. It became more apparent that the site managers were prioritizing the physical fabric of the site at the expense of the spiritual aspects. Lack of coordination among the actors was also undermining the governance structure. Four thematic strands which included local values and intangible cultural heritage elements; heritage governance; climate change and environmental sustainability and incorporation of local knowledge systems were identified for further research.Originality/valueThe paper is an outcome of collaborative efforts that were done by academics and practitioners. Researchers and site managers at Great Zimbabwe had hitherto worked in silos. The majority of previous and ongoing research on the World Heritage property falls short of addressing the dire management challenges. The paper is an attempt to broaden the scope in terms of the management of the site. In the past focus has been on the monumental aspects of the site with specific reference to the dry-stone walled structures. However, in this instance, the Research-Practice Team has integrated new interests such as the intangible aspects of Great Zimbabwe, spirituality and community beneficiation.
理论与实践相结合——通过对大津巴布韦世界遗产进行以实践为主导的研究,加强遗产管理
本文的目的是概述和反思大津巴布韦世界遗产的新研究议程。本研究议程分别由大津巴布韦大学(GZU)和津巴布韦国家博物馆和纪念碑(NMMZ)的学者和实践者共同制定。这个研究实践小组是为遗产实验室(HPL)组建的,这是ICCROM-IUCN世界遗产领导计划的一个试点项目。设计/方法/方法采取了一系列步骤,以提出研究重点和新的研究议程,并在本文中提出。由于COVID-19的旅行限制,HPL项目涉及在2021年9月至2022年4月期间举行的在线研讨会。HPL方法涉及六项基于教科文组织及其咨询机构正在设计的“增强我们的遗产工具包2.0”(EOH)的作业。该工具包鼓励团队建立特定于场地的管理问题和研究需求。该工具包帮助团队详细了解该遗址的突出普遍价值以及其他具有国家和地方重要性的遗产价值。该工具包还包括站点属性和多个参与者的映射,以及治理和法律框架的分析。该工具包还要求团队确定影响遗产的因素。研究实践小组强调了由于对世界遗产缺乏了解的研究活动和保护工作所带来的挑战。越来越明显的是,站点管理人员优先考虑站点的物理结构,而牺牲了精神方面。行动者之间缺乏协调也破坏了治理结构。四个主题,包括本地价值和非物质文化遗产元素;遗产治理;确定了气候变化和环境可持续性以及结合当地知识系统的进一步研究。原创性/价值这篇论文是学者和实践者共同努力的结果。迄今为止,大津巴布韦的研究人员和现场管理人员一直在各自为政。以往和正在进行的关于世界遗产的大多数研究都未能解决严峻的管理挑战。本文试图从场地管理的角度拓宽场地管理的范围。在过去,重点一直放在遗址的纪念性方面,具体参考了干石墙结构。然而,在这种情况下,研究实践小组整合了新的兴趣,如大津巴布韦的无形方面,灵性和社区福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信