Compatibility of the Capital of Nusantara’s Form of Government Against Article 18B Section (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

SASI Pub Date : 2022-10-13 DOI:10.47268/sasi.v28i3.1029
Bimo Fajar Hantoro
{"title":"Compatibility of the Capital of Nusantara’s Form of Government Against Article 18B Section (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia","authors":"Bimo Fajar Hantoro","doi":"10.47268/sasi.v28i3.1029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: With the promulgation of Law Number 3 of 2022 on State Capital, the government realized its plan to relocate the nation’s capital from the Specific Capital Region of Jakarta to the Capital of Nusantara on the Kalimantan Island. However, the law's passage has sparked a debate directed at the Indonesian new capital's form of government which is deemed to violate the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, specifically Articles 18, 18A, and 18B.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the compatibility of the Capital of Nusantara’s form of government against Article 18B section (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.Methods of the Research: This is a normative juridical study using primary and secondary legal materials that are relevant to the topic of this study.Results of the Research: The results showed that the specific arrangements of the Capital of Nusantara’s form of government are normatively compatible with Article 18B section (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia for two reasons, namely: the position between Article 18B section (1) and Article 18 as equals and that both of them apply independently; and the specificity that can be regulated for the Capital of Nusantara is flexible which means that the extent of the specificities can be so broad, including in terms of the form of government.","PeriodicalId":53158,"journal":{"name":"SASI","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SASI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i3.1029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: With the promulgation of Law Number 3 of 2022 on State Capital, the government realized its plan to relocate the nation’s capital from the Specific Capital Region of Jakarta to the Capital of Nusantara on the Kalimantan Island. However, the law's passage has sparked a debate directed at the Indonesian new capital's form of government which is deemed to violate the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, specifically Articles 18, 18A, and 18B.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the compatibility of the Capital of Nusantara’s form of government against Article 18B section (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.Methods of the Research: This is a normative juridical study using primary and secondary legal materials that are relevant to the topic of this study.Results of the Research: The results showed that the specific arrangements of the Capital of Nusantara’s form of government are normatively compatible with Article 18B section (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia for two reasons, namely: the position between Article 18B section (1) and Article 18 as equals and that both of them apply independently; and the specificity that can be regulated for the Capital of Nusantara is flexible which means that the extent of the specificities can be so broad, including in terms of the form of government.
努沙马拉首都的政府形式与1945年印度尼西亚共和国宪法第18B条第(1)款的兼容性
简介:随着2022年关于国家首都的第3号法律的颁布,政府实现了将国家首都从雅加达特定首都地区迁至加里曼丹岛首府努桑塔拉的计划。然而,该法律的通过引发了一场针对印尼新首都政府形式的辩论,这被认为违反了1945年《印度尼西亚共和国宪法》,特别是第18、18A、,和18B.研究目的:本研究的目的是检查和分析努桑塔拉首都的政府形式与1945年《印度尼西亚共和国宪法》第18B条第(1)款的兼容性。研究方法:这是一项规范性司法研究,使用了与本研究主题相关的主要和次要法律材料。研究结果:研究结果表明,努桑塔拉首都政府形式的具体安排在规范上符合1945年《印度尼西亚共和国宪法》第18B条第(1)款的规定,原因有两个:第18B款(1)项和第18条之间的地位平等,两者独立适用;努桑塔拉首都可以监管的特殊性是灵活的,这意味着特殊性的范围可以如此广泛,包括在政府形式方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信