Remaining Useful Life Estimation Based on Detection of Explosive Changes: Analysis of Bearing Vibration

IF 1.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Diana Barraza, V´ıctor G. Tercero-G´omez, A. Cordero-Franco, M. Beruvides
{"title":"Remaining Useful Life Estimation Based on Detection of Explosive Changes: Analysis of Bearing Vibration","authors":"Diana Barraza, V´ıctor G. Tercero-G´omez, A. Cordero-Franco, M. Beruvides","doi":"10.36001/IJPHM.2020.V11I1.2609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The monitoring of condition variables for maintenance purposes is a growing trend amongst researchers and practitioners where decisions are based on degradation levels. The two approaches in Condition-Based Maintenance (CBM) are diagnosing the level of degradation (diagnostics) or predicting when a certain level of degradation will be reached (prognostics). Using diagnostics determines when it is necessary to perform maintenance, but it rarely allows for estimation of future degradation. In the second case, prognostics does allow for degradation and failure prediction, however, its major drawback lies in when to perform the analysis, and exactly what information should be used for predictions. This encumbrance is due to previous studies that have shown that degradation variable could undergo a change that misleads these calculations. This paper addresses the issue of identifying explosive changes in condition variables, using Control Charts, to determine when to perform a new model fitting in order to obtain more accurate Remaining Useful Life (RUL) estimations. The diagnostic-prognostic methodology allows for discarding pre-change observations to avoid contamination in condition prediction. In addition the performance of the integration methodology is compared against adaptive autoregressive (AR) models. Results show that using only the observations acquired after the out-of-control signal produces more accurate RUL estimations.","PeriodicalId":42100,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36001/IJPHM.2020.V11I1.2609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The monitoring of condition variables for maintenance purposes is a growing trend amongst researchers and practitioners where decisions are based on degradation levels. The two approaches in Condition-Based Maintenance (CBM) are diagnosing the level of degradation (diagnostics) or predicting when a certain level of degradation will be reached (prognostics). Using diagnostics determines when it is necessary to perform maintenance, but it rarely allows for estimation of future degradation. In the second case, prognostics does allow for degradation and failure prediction, however, its major drawback lies in when to perform the analysis, and exactly what information should be used for predictions. This encumbrance is due to previous studies that have shown that degradation variable could undergo a change that misleads these calculations. This paper addresses the issue of identifying explosive changes in condition variables, using Control Charts, to determine when to perform a new model fitting in order to obtain more accurate Remaining Useful Life (RUL) estimations. The diagnostic-prognostic methodology allows for discarding pre-change observations to avoid contamination in condition prediction. In addition the performance of the integration methodology is compared against adaptive autoregressive (AR) models. Results show that using only the observations acquired after the out-of-control signal produces more accurate RUL estimations.
基于爆炸变化检测的剩余使用寿命估算——轴承振动分析
监测状态变量的维护目的是一个日益增长的趋势,在研究人员和从业人员的决策是基于退化水平。基于状态的维护(CBM)中的两种方法是诊断退化水平(诊断)或预测何时达到一定程度的退化(预后)。使用诊断可以确定何时需要执行维护,但很少允许估计未来的降级。在第二种情况下,预测确实允许降级和故障预测,然而,它的主要缺点在于何时执行分析,以及应该使用哪些信息进行预测。这种阻碍是由于以前的研究表明,退化变量可能会发生变化,从而误导了这些计算。本文解决了识别条件变量的爆炸性变化的问题,使用控制图来确定何时执行新的模型拟合,以获得更准确的剩余使用寿命(RUL)估计。诊断-预后方法允许丢弃变化前的观察,以避免在状态预测中受到污染。此外,还将集成方法的性能与自适应自回归(AR)模型进行了比较。结果表明,仅使用失控信号后的观测值可以获得更准确的RUL估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.50%
发文量
18
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信