Effects of closed versus open groups on attrition and recidivism outcomes for sex offenders in custody-based treatment programmes

IF 1.6 4区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
M. Howard, Zhigang Wei
{"title":"Effects of closed versus open groups on attrition and recidivism outcomes for sex offenders in custody-based treatment programmes","authors":"M. Howard, Zhigang Wei","doi":"10.1080/13552600.2021.1905894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There is growing recognition for the importance of group processes in treatment for sexual and other offenders. However, there is little evidence about the influence of programmming factors that affect the composition of groups, including use of closed or open groups. The current study examined how group format was associated with programme attrition and reoffending outcomes for sex offenders attending custody-based treatment programmes. Cohorts of offenders who attended a programme as it transitioned from a closed group format to an open group format were compared to cohorts of offenders in a second programme that remained in closed group format over the study period (n = 490). We found that post-intervention cohorts in both programmes showed reductions in rates of programme non-completion which were not significantly associated with group format. Group format was not a significant predictor of reoffending outcomes. The results suggest that both open and closed groups may be viable alternatives for achieving treatment outcomes in intensive sex offender programmes.","PeriodicalId":46758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sexual Aggression","volume":"28 1","pages":"76 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13552600.2021.1905894","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sexual Aggression","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2021.1905894","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is growing recognition for the importance of group processes in treatment for sexual and other offenders. However, there is little evidence about the influence of programmming factors that affect the composition of groups, including use of closed or open groups. The current study examined how group format was associated with programme attrition and reoffending outcomes for sex offenders attending custody-based treatment programmes. Cohorts of offenders who attended a programme as it transitioned from a closed group format to an open group format were compared to cohorts of offenders in a second programme that remained in closed group format over the study period (n = 490). We found that post-intervention cohorts in both programmes showed reductions in rates of programme non-completion which were not significantly associated with group format. Group format was not a significant predictor of reoffending outcomes. The results suggest that both open and closed groups may be viable alternatives for achieving treatment outcomes in intensive sex offender programmes.
封闭组与开放组对在押治疗方案中性犯罪者流失和累犯结果的影响
摘要人们越来越认识到群体程序在性犯罪者和其他罪犯治疗中的重要性。然而,很少有证据表明编程因素会影响组的组成,包括封闭或开放组的使用。目前的研究调查了团体形式与参加基于监护的治疗计划的性犯罪者的计划流失和再犯结果之间的关系。当一个项目从封闭小组形式转变为开放小组形式时,参加该项目的罪犯队列与在研究期间保持封闭小组形式的第二个项目中的罪犯队列进行了比较(n = 490)。我们发现,两个项目的干预后队列都显示出项目未完成率的降低,这与小组形式没有显著关联。团体形式不是再次犯罪结果的重要预测因素。研究结果表明,开放式和封闭式小组都可能是实现性犯罪强化方案治疗结果的可行替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sexual Aggression
Journal of Sexual Aggression CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信