Formative and Shared Assessment and Final Degree Projects in Physical Education Pre-service Teacher Education
IF 1.1
Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Carla Fernández-Garcimartín, Víctor M. López-Pastor, Teresa Fuentes-Nieto, David Hortigüela-Alcalá
求助PDF
{"title":"Formative and Shared Assessment and Final Degree Projects in Physical Education Pre-service Teacher Education","authors":"Carla Fernández-Garcimartín, Víctor M. López-Pastor, Teresa Fuentes-Nieto, David Hortigüela-Alcalá","doi":"10.12800/ccd.v18i55.1922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research is to analyse the processes of formative and shared-assessment (F&SA) in the development-tutoring and defence-evaluation of the Final Year Projects (FYP) in Physical Education Teacher Education. A case study was carried out with 20 participants (12 lecturers and 8 students), applying four data collection techniques (in-depth interviews, focus group, group interview and seminar proceedings). The results show that it is possible to carry out F&SA processes during the development and final evaluation of the FYP. The main results are: (a) rubrics are not usually used as an instrument for feedback, self-regulation and self-assessment;(b) during the COVID-19 confinement, rubrics were used to provide formative feedback and to justify the online grading of the FYP;(c) teachers and students prefer the defence of the FYP to be face to face, due to the advantages in terms of the feedback they obtain. Lessons learned are provided on how to carry out F&SA processes during the tutoring-development and evaluation-defence of the FYP using the rubrics as a formative, feedback and feedforward element. These results represent an advance in the learning processes using F&SA and feedback in a very understudied subject, the FYP. © 2023, Universidad Catolica San Antonio Murcia.","PeriodicalId":44657,"journal":{"name":"Cultura Ciencia y Deporte","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultura Ciencia y Deporte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12800/ccd.v18i55.1922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
引用
批量引用
Abstract
The aim of this research is to analyse the processes of formative and shared-assessment (F&SA) in the development-tutoring and defence-evaluation of the Final Year Projects (FYP) in Physical Education Teacher Education. A case study was carried out with 20 participants (12 lecturers and 8 students), applying four data collection techniques (in-depth interviews, focus group, group interview and seminar proceedings). The results show that it is possible to carry out F&SA processes during the development and final evaluation of the FYP. The main results are: (a) rubrics are not usually used as an instrument for feedback, self-regulation and self-assessment;(b) during the COVID-19 confinement, rubrics were used to provide formative feedback and to justify the online grading of the FYP;(c) teachers and students prefer the defence of the FYP to be face to face, due to the advantages in terms of the feedback they obtain. Lessons learned are provided on how to carry out F&SA processes during the tutoring-development and evaluation-defence of the FYP using the rubrics as a formative, feedback and feedforward element. These results represent an advance in the learning processes using F&SA and feedback in a very understudied subject, the FYP. © 2023, Universidad Catolica San Antonio Murcia.
体育职前教师教育中的形成性共享评估与最终学位设计
摘要本研究的目的是分析体育教师教育最后一年项目(FYP)的开发-辅导和辩护-评估过程中的形成性和共享性评估(F&SA)过程。对20名参与者(12名讲师和8名学生)进行了案例研究,采用了四种数据收集技术(深度访谈、焦点小组、小组访谈和研讨会记录)。结果表明,在“五年计划”的制定和最终评价过程中,可以实施食品安全过程。主要结果是:(a)标准通常不被用作反馈、自我调节和自我评估的工具;(b)在COVID-19隔离期间,标准被用于提供形成性反馈,并证明在线评分的合理性;(c)教师和学生更喜欢面对面的五年规划辩护,因为他们获得的反馈更有优势。提供了关于如何在指导-发展和评估-捍卫五年期规划期间使用准则作为形成性、反馈性和前馈性元素来执行F&SA过程的经验教训。这些结果代表了在学习过程中使用F&SA和反馈的进展,这是一个研究非常不足的主题,即五年计划。©2023,圣安东尼奥穆尔西亚天主教大学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
来源期刊
期刊介绍:
Cultura_Ciencia_Deporte (CCD) will consider research studies related to the different areas of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences for publication, that are scientifically based. Given the specialized nature of the journal, have no place in it simple popular articles, or those limited to exposing opinions and not conclusions based on investigation. Papers should be sent electronically through our website: http://ccd.ucam.edu, where the author must register as an author and proceed as indicated by the tool.