Australia, ‘the most voter-friendly country in the world’? Examining voting rights for people with physical disabilities

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW
Ethan Katz
{"title":"Australia, ‘the most voter-friendly country in the world’? Examining voting rights for people with physical disabilities","authors":"Ethan Katz","doi":"10.1177/1037969x231190481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite Australia’s reputation as a jurisdiction with enviable voter enfranchisement and participation procedures, people with physical disabilities are inadequately catered for by federal and state/territory electoral processes. While alternative voting schemes seek to address this issue, they are either too narrowly constructed, carry election integrity risks, or otherwise provide a voting experience lacking independence. This article examines adequate enfranchisement for people with physical disabilities in the context of Australia’s international human rights law obligations, including the case study of Given v Australia. Barriers to full enfranchisement of people with physical disabilities are considered, including cost, logistics and political will.","PeriodicalId":44595,"journal":{"name":"Alternative Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969x231190481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite Australia’s reputation as a jurisdiction with enviable voter enfranchisement and participation procedures, people with physical disabilities are inadequately catered for by federal and state/territory electoral processes. While alternative voting schemes seek to address this issue, they are either too narrowly constructed, carry election integrity risks, or otherwise provide a voting experience lacking independence. This article examines adequate enfranchisement for people with physical disabilities in the context of Australia’s international human rights law obligations, including the case study of Given v Australia. Barriers to full enfranchisement of people with physical disabilities are considered, including cost, logistics and political will.
澳大利亚,“世界上对选民最友好的国家”?审查身体残疾者的投票权
尽管澳大利亚享有令人羡慕的选民选举权和参与程序,但联邦和州/地区的选举程序并没有充分照顾到身体残疾的人。虽然替代投票计划试图解决这一问题,但它们要么结构过于狭窄,存在选举诚信风险,要么提供缺乏独立性的投票体验。本文结合澳大利亚的国际人权法义务,包括Given诉澳大利亚案的案例研究,探讨了对身体残疾者的充分选举权。考虑到了全面授予身体残疾人选举权的障碍,包括成本、后勤和政治意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信